Aprajit Mahajan, Shekhar Mittal, Ofir Reich, Taha Barwahwala
{"title":"利用机器学习抓住骗子公司","authors":"Aprajit Mahajan, Shekhar Mittal, Ofir Reich, Taha Barwahwala","doi":"10.1145/3676188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the use of a machine learning (ML) algorithm to identify fraudulent non-existent firms that are used for tax evasion. Using a rich dataset of tax returns in an Indian state over several years, we train an ML-based model to predict fraudulent firms. We then use the model predictions to carry out field inspections of firms identified as suspicious by the ML tool. We find that the ML model is accurate in both simulated and field settings in identifying non-existent firms. Withholding a randomly selected group of firms from inspection, we estimate the causal impact of ML driven inspections. Despite the strong predictive performance, our model driven inspections do not yield a significant increase in enforcement as evidenced by the cancellation of fraudulent firm registrations and tax recovery. We provide two explanations for this discrepancy based on a close analysis of the tax department’s operating protocols: overfitting to proxy-labels, and institutional friction in integrating the model into existing administrative systems. Our study serves as a cautionary tale for the application of machine learning in public policy contexts and of relying solely on test set performance as an effectiveness indicator. Field evaluations are critical in assessing the real-world impact of predictive models.","PeriodicalId":505364,"journal":{"name":"ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Machine Learning to Catch Bogus Firms\",\"authors\":\"Aprajit Mahajan, Shekhar Mittal, Ofir Reich, Taha Barwahwala\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3676188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate the use of a machine learning (ML) algorithm to identify fraudulent non-existent firms that are used for tax evasion. Using a rich dataset of tax returns in an Indian state over several years, we train an ML-based model to predict fraudulent firms. We then use the model predictions to carry out field inspections of firms identified as suspicious by the ML tool. We find that the ML model is accurate in both simulated and field settings in identifying non-existent firms. Withholding a randomly selected group of firms from inspection, we estimate the causal impact of ML driven inspections. Despite the strong predictive performance, our model driven inspections do not yield a significant increase in enforcement as evidenced by the cancellation of fraudulent firm registrations and tax recovery. We provide two explanations for this discrepancy based on a close analysis of the tax department’s operating protocols: overfitting to proxy-labels, and institutional friction in integrating the model into existing administrative systems. Our study serves as a cautionary tale for the application of machine learning in public policy contexts and of relying solely on test set performance as an effectiveness indicator. Field evaluations are critical in assessing the real-world impact of predictive models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3676188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3676188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们研究了如何利用机器学习(ML)算法来识别用于逃税的不存在的欺诈性公司。利用印度某邦数年来丰富的纳税申报数据集,我们训练了一个基于 ML 的模型来预测欺诈性公司。然后,我们利用模型预测结果,对 ML 工具识别出的可疑公司进行实地检查。我们发现,无论是在模拟环境中还是在实地环境中,ML 模型都能准确识别不存在的公司。在不对随机抽取的一组企业进行检查的情况下,我们估算了 ML 驱动检查的因果影响。尽管具有很强的预测性能,但我们的模型驱动检查并没有显著提高执法力度,虚假企业注册的注销和税款的追缴都证明了这一点。基于对税务部门操作规程的仔细分析,我们对这一差异提供了两种解释:对代理标签的过度拟合,以及将模型整合到现有管理系统中的制度摩擦。我们的研究为机器学习在公共政策环境中的应用以及单纯依赖测试集性能作为有效性指标提供了警示。实地评估对于评估预测模型在现实世界中的影响至关重要。
We investigate the use of a machine learning (ML) algorithm to identify fraudulent non-existent firms that are used for tax evasion. Using a rich dataset of tax returns in an Indian state over several years, we train an ML-based model to predict fraudulent firms. We then use the model predictions to carry out field inspections of firms identified as suspicious by the ML tool. We find that the ML model is accurate in both simulated and field settings in identifying non-existent firms. Withholding a randomly selected group of firms from inspection, we estimate the causal impact of ML driven inspections. Despite the strong predictive performance, our model driven inspections do not yield a significant increase in enforcement as evidenced by the cancellation of fraudulent firm registrations and tax recovery. We provide two explanations for this discrepancy based on a close analysis of the tax department’s operating protocols: overfitting to proxy-labels, and institutional friction in integrating the model into existing administrative systems. Our study serves as a cautionary tale for the application of machine learning in public policy contexts and of relying solely on test set performance as an effectiveness indicator. Field evaluations are critical in assessing the real-world impact of predictive models.