学校中的社会工作者:对三个地方当局的可行性研究

David Westlake, G. J. Melendez-Torres, C. Corliss, Asmaa El-Banna, Sarah Thompson, M. Meindl, R. Talwar, Louise Folkes, Eva Schoenwald, Samia Addis, Laura Cook
{"title":"学校中的社会工作者:对三个地方当局的可行性研究","authors":"David Westlake, G. J. Melendez-Torres, C. Corliss, Asmaa El-Banna, Sarah Thompson, M. Meindl, R. Talwar, Louise Folkes, Eva Schoenwald, Samia Addis, Laura Cook","doi":"10.1177/14680173241258927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated the feasibility of ‘Social Workers in Schools’, an intervention that involved social workers being based within schools across three local authorities in England (SWIS). Schools make a large number of referrals to Children's Social Care and play an important role in recognizing risks to children and protecting them from harm, but it is unusual for social workers to be based in schools in the U.K. and to do statutory work. We evaluated the pilots on the basis of the feasibility of implementing SWIS, how promising it was in terms of reducing the need for statutory intervention, and the extent to which it be scaled. We used a mixed methods approach, with a process evaluation and a difference in differences analysis of indicative impact on key social care outcomes. In addition, we estimated the cost of implementing and maintaining SWIS. We found high levels of acceptability among those involved, and examples of how SWIS enhances the way safeguarding issues are addressed. There was also some evidence that it may reduce the need for social care interventions, though this needs ratifying with more and better data. The study suggests that SWIS is a promising intervention. Both the qualitative and quantitative findings suggest it may have the intended policy impact, but this needs to be tested on a larger scale and with a more rigorous counterfactual comparison. Such a study—a randomized-controlled trial involving 21 local authorities—was commissioned in 2020.","PeriodicalId":515680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work","volume":"119 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social workers in schools: A feasibility study of three local authorities\",\"authors\":\"David Westlake, G. J. Melendez-Torres, C. Corliss, Asmaa El-Banna, Sarah Thompson, M. Meindl, R. Talwar, Louise Folkes, Eva Schoenwald, Samia Addis, Laura Cook\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14680173241258927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study evaluated the feasibility of ‘Social Workers in Schools’, an intervention that involved social workers being based within schools across three local authorities in England (SWIS). Schools make a large number of referrals to Children's Social Care and play an important role in recognizing risks to children and protecting them from harm, but it is unusual for social workers to be based in schools in the U.K. and to do statutory work. We evaluated the pilots on the basis of the feasibility of implementing SWIS, how promising it was in terms of reducing the need for statutory intervention, and the extent to which it be scaled. We used a mixed methods approach, with a process evaluation and a difference in differences analysis of indicative impact on key social care outcomes. In addition, we estimated the cost of implementing and maintaining SWIS. We found high levels of acceptability among those involved, and examples of how SWIS enhances the way safeguarding issues are addressed. There was also some evidence that it may reduce the need for social care interventions, though this needs ratifying with more and better data. The study suggests that SWIS is a promising intervention. Both the qualitative and quantitative findings suggest it may have the intended policy impact, but this needs to be tested on a larger scale and with a more rigorous counterfactual comparison. Such a study—a randomized-controlled trial involving 21 local authorities—was commissioned in 2020.\",\"PeriodicalId\":515680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Work\",\"volume\":\"119 29\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173241258927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173241258927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了 "社工进校园 "的可行性,这项干预措施涉及英格兰三个地方当局(SWIS)的社工进驻学校。学校向儿童社会关怀机构转介了大量案件,并在识别儿童面临的风险和保护儿童免受伤害方面发挥了重要作用,但在英国,社工常驻学校并从事法定工作的情况并不多见。我们对试点项目进行评估的依据是:实施 SWIS 的可行性、SWIS 在减少法定干预需求方面的前景,以及 SWIS 的推广程度。我们采用了混合方法,包括过程评估和对主要社会护理成果的指示性影响进行差异分析。此外,我们还估算了实施和维护 SWIS 的成本。我们发现,参与人员对 SWIS 的接受程度很高,并有实例说明 SWIS 如何增强了处理保障问题的方式。还有一些证据表明,该系统可以减少对社会护理干预的需求,但这需要更多更好的数据来证实。研究表明,全部门办法是一种很有前途的干预措施。定性和定量研究结果都表明,它可能会产生预期的政策影响,但这需要在更大的范围内,通过更严格的反事实比较来检验。2020 年将委托开展这样一项研究--涉及 21 个地方当局的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social workers in schools: A feasibility study of three local authorities
This study evaluated the feasibility of ‘Social Workers in Schools’, an intervention that involved social workers being based within schools across three local authorities in England (SWIS). Schools make a large number of referrals to Children's Social Care and play an important role in recognizing risks to children and protecting them from harm, but it is unusual for social workers to be based in schools in the U.K. and to do statutory work. We evaluated the pilots on the basis of the feasibility of implementing SWIS, how promising it was in terms of reducing the need for statutory intervention, and the extent to which it be scaled. We used a mixed methods approach, with a process evaluation and a difference in differences analysis of indicative impact on key social care outcomes. In addition, we estimated the cost of implementing and maintaining SWIS. We found high levels of acceptability among those involved, and examples of how SWIS enhances the way safeguarding issues are addressed. There was also some evidence that it may reduce the need for social care interventions, though this needs ratifying with more and better data. The study suggests that SWIS is a promising intervention. Both the qualitative and quantitative findings suggest it may have the intended policy impact, but this needs to be tested on a larger scale and with a more rigorous counterfactual comparison. Such a study—a randomized-controlled trial involving 21 local authorities—was commissioned in 2020.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social workers’ perspectives on adapting methods during the COVID-19 pandemic Social workers in schools: A feasibility study of three local authorities Impact of COVID-19 on home care provision: A qualitative study Social work with Irish Travellers: Findings from a national evaluation Canadian social workers’ attitudes toward immigrants with different legal statuses in Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1