全球房地产基金的基金经理是否表现出高超的技能?

Abhay Kaushik
{"title":"全球房地产基金的基金经理是否表现出高超的技能?","authors":"Abhay Kaushik","doi":"10.33423/jaf.v24i3.7114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes US-domiciled actively managed global real estate funds (GREMFs) from 1/2010 to 12/2023. The results show superior selectivity and adverse market timing skills of fund managers. On average, GREMFs deliver alpha ranging from 2.52 percent to 2.75 percent per year after controlling for premiums offered by the market, size, value, and momentum effects. The alpha range increases to 4.65 percent annually after including the quadratic term of excess market returns. The results also show that many funds exhibit superior selectivity skills, thus making a case for investors to invest in actively managed GREMFs rather than investing in passive indices. However, the results also indicate that GREMFs are unable to manage beta loadings to their advantage.","PeriodicalId":505950,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Finance","volume":"72 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Fund Managers of Global Real Estate Funds Exhibit Superior Skill?\",\"authors\":\"Abhay Kaushik\",\"doi\":\"10.33423/jaf.v24i3.7114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study analyzes US-domiciled actively managed global real estate funds (GREMFs) from 1/2010 to 12/2023. The results show superior selectivity and adverse market timing skills of fund managers. On average, GREMFs deliver alpha ranging from 2.52 percent to 2.75 percent per year after controlling for premiums offered by the market, size, value, and momentum effects. The alpha range increases to 4.65 percent annually after including the quadratic term of excess market returns. The results also show that many funds exhibit superior selectivity skills, thus making a case for investors to invest in actively managed GREMFs rather than investing in passive indices. However, the results also indicate that GREMFs are unable to manage beta loadings to their advantage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting and Finance\",\"volume\":\"72 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v24i3.7114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v24i3.7114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 12 日期间在美国注册的主动管理型全球房地产基金(GREMF)。研究结果表明,基金经理具有卓越的选择性和逆市择时能力。在控制了市场提供的溢价、规模、价值和动量效应后,全球房地产基金平均每年提供 2.52% 至 2.75% 的阿尔法。在计入超额市场回报的二次项后,阿尔法范围增至每年 4.65%。结果还显示,许多基金表现出卓越的选择能力,因此投资者有理由投资于主动管理的 GREMF,而不是投资于被动指数。不过,结果也表明,GREMF 无法在管理贝塔载荷方面发挥优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Fund Managers of Global Real Estate Funds Exhibit Superior Skill?
This study analyzes US-domiciled actively managed global real estate funds (GREMFs) from 1/2010 to 12/2023. The results show superior selectivity and adverse market timing skills of fund managers. On average, GREMFs deliver alpha ranging from 2.52 percent to 2.75 percent per year after controlling for premiums offered by the market, size, value, and momentum effects. The alpha range increases to 4.65 percent annually after including the quadratic term of excess market returns. The results also show that many funds exhibit superior selectivity skills, thus making a case for investors to invest in actively managed GREMFs rather than investing in passive indices. However, the results also indicate that GREMFs are unable to manage beta loadings to their advantage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Relationship Between Asset-Liability Management and Governance Quality in the Banking Industry The Role of National Culture and Corruption on Real Earnings Management Around the World Regional Analysis of Stock Returns Effect of Earnings Management and Corporate Tax Avoidance Remarks on Fixed Point Approaches to Insurance and Finance Revisiting the Portfolio Diversification Impact of Farmland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1