April W. Armstrong, M. Lebwohl, Richard B Warren, H. Sofen, Akimchi Morita, Shinichi Imafuku, M. Ohtsuki, L. Spelman, T. Passeron, Kim A. Papp, Matthew J Colombo, John Vaile, E. Vritzali, K. Hoyt, C. Daamen, Subhashis Banerjee, B. Strober, Diamant Thaçi, Andrew Blauvelt
{"title":"斑块状银屑病中的 Deucravacitinib:POETYK PSO-1、PSO-2 和 LTE 3 期试验的 4 年安全性和疗效结果","authors":"April W. Armstrong, M. Lebwohl, Richard B Warren, H. Sofen, Akimchi Morita, Shinichi Imafuku, M. Ohtsuki, L. Spelman, T. Passeron, Kim A. Papp, Matthew J Colombo, John Vaile, E. Vritzali, K. Hoyt, C. Daamen, Subhashis Banerjee, B. Strober, Diamant Thaçi, Andrew Blauvelt","doi":"10.25251/skin.8.supp.406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric TYK2 inhibitor, is approved in the US, EU, and other countries for treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy. Deucravacitinib was superior to placebo and apremilast in the phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 trials in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Upon trial completion, patients could enroll in the ongoing POETYK long-term extension (LTE) trial. Here, deucravacitinib safety and efficacy are reported through 4 years. \nMethods: PSO-1/PSO-2 randomized patients 1:2:1 to placebo, deucravacitinib 6 mg QD, or apremilast 30 mg BID. At Week 52, patients in the LTE received open-label deucravacitinib 6 mg QD. Safety was evaluated in patients receiving ≥1 deucravacitinib dose. Exposure-adjusted incidence rate (EAIR) per 100 person-years (PY) was used to assess adverse events (AEs). Efficacy outcomes included PASI 75, PASI 90, and sPGA 0/1 and were analyzed using mNRI in LTE patients receiving continuous deucravacitinib from Day 1 of the parent trials. \nResults: 1519 patients received ≥1 deucravacitinib dose; cumulative exposure was 4392.8 PY. EAIRs/100 PY were decreased/comparable from the 1- to 4-year cumulative period, respectively: AEs (229.2, 131.7), serious AEs (5.7, 5.0), deaths (0.2, 0.3), discontinuation due to AEs (4.4, 2.2), herpes zoster (0.8, 0.6), malignancies (1.0, 0.9), MACE (0.3, 0.3), and venous thromboembolism (0.2, 0.1). With continuous deucravacitinib treatment (n = 513), clinical response rates were maintained from Year 3 (PASI 75, 73.8% [95% CI, 69.6, 78.0]; PASI 90, 49.0% [95% CI, 44.4, 53.7]; sPGA 0/1, 55.2% [95% CI, 50.5, 59.9]) to Year 4 (PASI 75, 71.7% [95% CI, 67.0, 76.3]; PASI 90, 47.5% [95% CI, 42.6, 52.4]; sPGA 0/1, 57.2% [95% CI, 52.1, 62.2]) by mNRI. \nConclusion: Deucravacitinib demonstrated durable efficacy with continuous treatment and a safety profile through 4 years consistent with that at 3 years, without new or long-term safety signals.","PeriodicalId":22013,"journal":{"name":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deucravacitinib in Plaque Psoriasis: 4-Year Safety and Efficacy Results From the Phase 3 POETYK PSO-1, PSO-2, and LTE Trials\",\"authors\":\"April W. Armstrong, M. Lebwohl, Richard B Warren, H. Sofen, Akimchi Morita, Shinichi Imafuku, M. Ohtsuki, L. Spelman, T. Passeron, Kim A. Papp, Matthew J Colombo, John Vaile, E. Vritzali, K. Hoyt, C. Daamen, Subhashis Banerjee, B. Strober, Diamant Thaçi, Andrew Blauvelt\",\"doi\":\"10.25251/skin.8.supp.406\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric TYK2 inhibitor, is approved in the US, EU, and other countries for treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy. Deucravacitinib was superior to placebo and apremilast in the phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 trials in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Upon trial completion, patients could enroll in the ongoing POETYK long-term extension (LTE) trial. Here, deucravacitinib safety and efficacy are reported through 4 years. \\nMethods: PSO-1/PSO-2 randomized patients 1:2:1 to placebo, deucravacitinib 6 mg QD, or apremilast 30 mg BID. At Week 52, patients in the LTE received open-label deucravacitinib 6 mg QD. Safety was evaluated in patients receiving ≥1 deucravacitinib dose. Exposure-adjusted incidence rate (EAIR) per 100 person-years (PY) was used to assess adverse events (AEs). Efficacy outcomes included PASI 75, PASI 90, and sPGA 0/1 and were analyzed using mNRI in LTE patients receiving continuous deucravacitinib from Day 1 of the parent trials. \\nResults: 1519 patients received ≥1 deucravacitinib dose; cumulative exposure was 4392.8 PY. EAIRs/100 PY were decreased/comparable from the 1- to 4-year cumulative period, respectively: AEs (229.2, 131.7), serious AEs (5.7, 5.0), deaths (0.2, 0.3), discontinuation due to AEs (4.4, 2.2), herpes zoster (0.8, 0.6), malignancies (1.0, 0.9), MACE (0.3, 0.3), and venous thromboembolism (0.2, 0.1). With continuous deucravacitinib treatment (n = 513), clinical response rates were maintained from Year 3 (PASI 75, 73.8% [95% CI, 69.6, 78.0]; PASI 90, 49.0% [95% CI, 44.4, 53.7]; sPGA 0/1, 55.2% [95% CI, 50.5, 59.9]) to Year 4 (PASI 75, 71.7% [95% CI, 67.0, 76.3]; PASI 90, 47.5% [95% CI, 42.6, 52.4]; sPGA 0/1, 57.2% [95% CI, 52.1, 62.2]) by mNRI. \\nConclusion: Deucravacitinib demonstrated durable efficacy with continuous treatment and a safety profile through 4 years consistent with that at 3 years, without new or long-term safety signals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.supp.406\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.8.supp.406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deucravacitinib in Plaque Psoriasis: 4-Year Safety and Efficacy Results From the Phase 3 POETYK PSO-1, PSO-2, and LTE Trials
Introduction: Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric TYK2 inhibitor, is approved in the US, EU, and other countries for treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy. Deucravacitinib was superior to placebo and apremilast in the phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 trials in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Upon trial completion, patients could enroll in the ongoing POETYK long-term extension (LTE) trial. Here, deucravacitinib safety and efficacy are reported through 4 years.
Methods: PSO-1/PSO-2 randomized patients 1:2:1 to placebo, deucravacitinib 6 mg QD, or apremilast 30 mg BID. At Week 52, patients in the LTE received open-label deucravacitinib 6 mg QD. Safety was evaluated in patients receiving ≥1 deucravacitinib dose. Exposure-adjusted incidence rate (EAIR) per 100 person-years (PY) was used to assess adverse events (AEs). Efficacy outcomes included PASI 75, PASI 90, and sPGA 0/1 and were analyzed using mNRI in LTE patients receiving continuous deucravacitinib from Day 1 of the parent trials.
Results: 1519 patients received ≥1 deucravacitinib dose; cumulative exposure was 4392.8 PY. EAIRs/100 PY were decreased/comparable from the 1- to 4-year cumulative period, respectively: AEs (229.2, 131.7), serious AEs (5.7, 5.0), deaths (0.2, 0.3), discontinuation due to AEs (4.4, 2.2), herpes zoster (0.8, 0.6), malignancies (1.0, 0.9), MACE (0.3, 0.3), and venous thromboembolism (0.2, 0.1). With continuous deucravacitinib treatment (n = 513), clinical response rates were maintained from Year 3 (PASI 75, 73.8% [95% CI, 69.6, 78.0]; PASI 90, 49.0% [95% CI, 44.4, 53.7]; sPGA 0/1, 55.2% [95% CI, 50.5, 59.9]) to Year 4 (PASI 75, 71.7% [95% CI, 67.0, 76.3]; PASI 90, 47.5% [95% CI, 42.6, 52.4]; sPGA 0/1, 57.2% [95% CI, 52.1, 62.2]) by mNRI.
Conclusion: Deucravacitinib demonstrated durable efficacy with continuous treatment and a safety profile through 4 years consistent with that at 3 years, without new or long-term safety signals.