学生对工作综合学习(WIL)质量的反思(RoQ):系统回顾与框架

M. Eady, David W. Drewery, Monica Burney, Wincy Li, Kimberley Livingstone
{"title":"学生对工作综合学习(WIL)质量的反思(RoQ):系统回顾与框架","authors":"M. Eady, David W. Drewery, Monica Burney, Wincy Li, Kimberley Livingstone","doi":"10.1108/heswbl-03-2024-0078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn light of the expanding prominence of work-integrated learning (WIL), the pedagogical model that integrates work experiences into an academic curriculum, this paper presents a systematic review that uncovers little-explored students’ reflections of quality (RoQ).Design/methodology/approachDrawing on the concept of wayfinding rocks and Bronfenbrenner’s (1979) ecological systems theory, the “students’ RoQ (pronounced [ROK]) WIL model” offers guidance for future research, policy development and educational interventions aimed at optimizing students' experiences of WIL.FindingsThis paper highlights RoQ WIL through student voice. The outcomes offer a model, contributing insights for institutions, employers and students involved in WIL experiences.Research limitations/implicationsWhile the study addresses specific limitations such as the use of specific search terms and potential biases, future research is needed to explore cultural capital’s influence on WIL quality. A focus on broadening the scope of data collection to include a more comprehensive range of student perspectives is needed.Practical implicationsThe paper suggests practical implications for institutions, employers and educators in designing WIL programs that prioritize student perspectives, ultimately enhancing the quality of WIL experiences.Originality/valueBy focusing on students' RoQ in WIL, this paper fills a significant gap in the literature and provides a foundation for future research and practice in optimizing WIL engagement and outcomes.","PeriodicalId":502760,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning","volume":"23 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Students' reflections of quality (RoQ) in work-integrated learning (WIL): a systematic review and framework\",\"authors\":\"M. Eady, David W. Drewery, Monica Burney, Wincy Li, Kimberley Livingstone\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/heswbl-03-2024-0078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeIn light of the expanding prominence of work-integrated learning (WIL), the pedagogical model that integrates work experiences into an academic curriculum, this paper presents a systematic review that uncovers little-explored students’ reflections of quality (RoQ).Design/methodology/approachDrawing on the concept of wayfinding rocks and Bronfenbrenner’s (1979) ecological systems theory, the “students’ RoQ (pronounced [ROK]) WIL model” offers guidance for future research, policy development and educational interventions aimed at optimizing students' experiences of WIL.FindingsThis paper highlights RoQ WIL through student voice. The outcomes offer a model, contributing insights for institutions, employers and students involved in WIL experiences.Research limitations/implicationsWhile the study addresses specific limitations such as the use of specific search terms and potential biases, future research is needed to explore cultural capital’s influence on WIL quality. A focus on broadening the scope of data collection to include a more comprehensive range of student perspectives is needed.Practical implicationsThe paper suggests practical implications for institutions, employers and educators in designing WIL programs that prioritize student perspectives, ultimately enhancing the quality of WIL experiences.Originality/valueBy focusing on students' RoQ in WIL, this paper fills a significant gap in the literature and provides a foundation for future research and practice in optimizing WIL engagement and outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning\",\"volume\":\"23 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-03-2024-0078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-03-2024-0078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的鉴于将工作经验融入学术课程的教学模式--工作综合学习(Work-integrated Learning,WIL)的重要性日益凸显,本文通过系统性综述,揭示了鲜为人知的学生对质量(RoQ)的反思。设计/方法/途径借鉴寻路石概念和布朗芬布伦纳(1979 年)的生态系统理论,"学生 RoQ(读作 [ROK])WIL 模型 "为未来研究、政策制定和教育干预提供了指导,旨在优化学生的 WIL 体验。研究局限性/启示虽然本研究解决了一些具体的局限性问题,如使用特定的搜索条件和潜在的偏见,但未来的研究还需要探索文化资本对 WIL 质量的影响。通过关注学生在 WIL 中的 RoQ,本文填补了文献中的一个重要空白,并为优化 WIL 参与度和成果的未来研究和实践奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Students' reflections of quality (RoQ) in work-integrated learning (WIL): a systematic review and framework
PurposeIn light of the expanding prominence of work-integrated learning (WIL), the pedagogical model that integrates work experiences into an academic curriculum, this paper presents a systematic review that uncovers little-explored students’ reflections of quality (RoQ).Design/methodology/approachDrawing on the concept of wayfinding rocks and Bronfenbrenner’s (1979) ecological systems theory, the “students’ RoQ (pronounced [ROK]) WIL model” offers guidance for future research, policy development and educational interventions aimed at optimizing students' experiences of WIL.FindingsThis paper highlights RoQ WIL through student voice. The outcomes offer a model, contributing insights for institutions, employers and students involved in WIL experiences.Research limitations/implicationsWhile the study addresses specific limitations such as the use of specific search terms and potential biases, future research is needed to explore cultural capital’s influence on WIL quality. A focus on broadening the scope of data collection to include a more comprehensive range of student perspectives is needed.Practical implicationsThe paper suggests practical implications for institutions, employers and educators in designing WIL programs that prioritize student perspectives, ultimately enhancing the quality of WIL experiences.Originality/valueBy focusing on students' RoQ in WIL, this paper fills a significant gap in the literature and provides a foundation for future research and practice in optimizing WIL engagement and outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Employability and long-term work life outcomes from studying at a Swedish university college: problematizing the notion of mismatch Investigating the mediating role of self-efficacy between digital leadership capability, intercultural competence, and employability among working undergraduates The use of problem-solving methodology to develop institutional and curricular change: work-integrated learning as a strategy of differentiation Students' reflections of quality (RoQ) in work-integrated learning (WIL): a systematic review and framework Employability and motivation: which motivational theories are most appropriate?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1