{"title":"模拟非辐射传播的日冕物质抛射并预测其到达地球的时间","authors":"Angelos Valentino, J. Magdalenic","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202449521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present the study of two solar eruptive events observed on December 7 2020 and October 28 2021. Both events were associated with full halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and flares. These events were chosen because they show a strong non-radial direction of propagation in the low corona and their main propagation direction observed in the inner heliosphere is not fully aligned with the Sun-Earth line. This characteristic makes them suitable for our study, which aims to inspect how the non-radial direction of propagation in the low corona affects the time of CMEs' arrival at Earth. We reconstructed the CMEs using SOHO/LASCO and STEREO/COR observations and modelled them with the 3D MHD model EUHFORIA and the cone model for CMEs. \nIn order to compare the accuracy of forecasting the CME and the CME-driven shock arrival time at Earth obtained from different methods, we also used so-called type II bursts, radio signatures of associated shocks, to find the velocities of the CME-driven shocks and forecast the time of their arrival at Earth. Additionally, we estimated the CME arrival time using the 2D CME velocity obtained from the white light images. \n\nOur results show that the lowest accuracy of estimated CME Earth arrival times is found when the 2D CME velocity is used (time difference between observed and modelled arrival time, Delta t approx -29 h and -39 h, for the two studied events, respectively). The velocity of the type II radio bursts provides somewhat better — but still not very accurate — results (Delta t approx +21 h and -29 h, for the two studied events, respectively). Employing, as an input to EUHFORIA, the CME parameters obtained from the graduated cylindrical shell (GCS) fittings at consequently increasing heights, results in a strongly improved accuracy of the modelled CME and shock arrival time; Delta t changes from 20 h to 10 min in the case of the first event, and from 12 h to 30 min in the case of the second one. \nThis improvement shows that when we increased the heights of the GCS reconstruction we accounted for the change in the propagation direction of the studied CMEs, which allowed us to accurately model the CME flank encounter at Earth. \nOur results show the great importance of the change in the direction of propagation of the CME in the low corona when modelling CMEs and estimating the time of their arrival at Earth.","PeriodicalId":8585,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":"20 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling non-radially propagating coronal mass ejections and forecasting the time of their arrival at Earth\",\"authors\":\"Angelos Valentino, J. Magdalenic\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/0004-6361/202449521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present the study of two solar eruptive events observed on December 7 2020 and October 28 2021. Both events were associated with full halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and flares. These events were chosen because they show a strong non-radial direction of propagation in the low corona and their main propagation direction observed in the inner heliosphere is not fully aligned with the Sun-Earth line. This characteristic makes them suitable for our study, which aims to inspect how the non-radial direction of propagation in the low corona affects the time of CMEs' arrival at Earth. We reconstructed the CMEs using SOHO/LASCO and STEREO/COR observations and modelled them with the 3D MHD model EUHFORIA and the cone model for CMEs. \\nIn order to compare the accuracy of forecasting the CME and the CME-driven shock arrival time at Earth obtained from different methods, we also used so-called type II bursts, radio signatures of associated shocks, to find the velocities of the CME-driven shocks and forecast the time of their arrival at Earth. Additionally, we estimated the CME arrival time using the 2D CME velocity obtained from the white light images. \\n\\nOur results show that the lowest accuracy of estimated CME Earth arrival times is found when the 2D CME velocity is used (time difference between observed and modelled arrival time, Delta t approx -29 h and -39 h, for the two studied events, respectively). The velocity of the type II radio bursts provides somewhat better — but still not very accurate — results (Delta t approx +21 h and -29 h, for the two studied events, respectively). Employing, as an input to EUHFORIA, the CME parameters obtained from the graduated cylindrical shell (GCS) fittings at consequently increasing heights, results in a strongly improved accuracy of the modelled CME and shock arrival time; Delta t changes from 20 h to 10 min in the case of the first event, and from 12 h to 30 min in the case of the second one. \\nThis improvement shows that when we increased the heights of the GCS reconstruction we accounted for the change in the propagation direction of the studied CMEs, which allowed us to accurately model the CME flank encounter at Earth. \\nOur results show the great importance of the change in the direction of propagation of the CME in the low corona when modelling CMEs and estimating the time of their arrival at Earth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astronomy & Astrophysics\",\"volume\":\"20 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astronomy & Astrophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们介绍了对 2020 年 12 月 7 日和 2021 年 10 月 28 日观测到的两次太阳爆发事件的研究。这两个事件都与全晕日冕物质抛射(CMEs)和耀斑有关。之所以选择这两个事件,是因为它们在低日冕中显示出强烈的非径向传播方向,而且在日光层内部观测到的主要传播方向与日地线并不完全一致。这一特点使它们适合我们的研究,我们的研究旨在考察低日冕中的非径向传播方向如何影响 CME 到达地球的时间。我们利用 SOHO/LASCO 和 STEREO/COR 的观测数据重建了 CMEs,并利用三维 MHD 模型 EUHFORIA 和 CMEs 锥体模型对其进行了模拟。为了比较用不同方法预测 CME 和 CME 驱动的冲击波到达地球时间的准确性,我们还利用所谓的 II 型爆发(相关冲击波的无线电特征)来寻找 CME 驱动的冲击波的速度并预测其到达地球的时间。此外,我们还利用从白光图像中获得的二维 CME 速度来估计 CME 到达时间。结果表明,使用二维 CME 速度估算 CME 到达地球时间的准确性最低(两个研究事件的观测到达时间与模拟到达时间的时间差 Delta t 分别约为 -29 h 和 -39 h)。用 II 型射电暴的速度得出的结果要好一些,但仍然不是很准确(两个研究事件的 Delta t 分别约为 +21 h 和 -29 h)。将从渐变圆柱壳(GCS)试样中获得的 CME 参数作为 EUHFORIA 的输入,在高度上不断增加,结果大大提高了模拟 CME 和冲击到达时间的准确性;在第一个事件中,Delta t 从 20 h 变为 10 min,在第二个事件中,Delta t 从 12 h 变为 30 min。这一改进表明,当我们增加全球气候观测系统重建的高度时,我们考虑到了所研究的 CME 传播方向的变化,这使我们能够准确地模拟 CME 在地球侧面的遭遇。我们的结果表明,在模拟 CME 和估计其到达地球的时间时,CME 在低日冕中传播方向的变化非常重要。
Modelling non-radially propagating coronal mass ejections and forecasting the time of their arrival at Earth
We present the study of two solar eruptive events observed on December 7 2020 and October 28 2021. Both events were associated with full halo coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and flares. These events were chosen because they show a strong non-radial direction of propagation in the low corona and their main propagation direction observed in the inner heliosphere is not fully aligned with the Sun-Earth line. This characteristic makes them suitable for our study, which aims to inspect how the non-radial direction of propagation in the low corona affects the time of CMEs' arrival at Earth. We reconstructed the CMEs using SOHO/LASCO and STEREO/COR observations and modelled them with the 3D MHD model EUHFORIA and the cone model for CMEs.
In order to compare the accuracy of forecasting the CME and the CME-driven shock arrival time at Earth obtained from different methods, we also used so-called type II bursts, radio signatures of associated shocks, to find the velocities of the CME-driven shocks and forecast the time of their arrival at Earth. Additionally, we estimated the CME arrival time using the 2D CME velocity obtained from the white light images.
Our results show that the lowest accuracy of estimated CME Earth arrival times is found when the 2D CME velocity is used (time difference between observed and modelled arrival time, Delta t approx -29 h and -39 h, for the two studied events, respectively). The velocity of the type II radio bursts provides somewhat better — but still not very accurate — results (Delta t approx +21 h and -29 h, for the two studied events, respectively). Employing, as an input to EUHFORIA, the CME parameters obtained from the graduated cylindrical shell (GCS) fittings at consequently increasing heights, results in a strongly improved accuracy of the modelled CME and shock arrival time; Delta t changes from 20 h to 10 min in the case of the first event, and from 12 h to 30 min in the case of the second one.
This improvement shows that when we increased the heights of the GCS reconstruction we accounted for the change in the propagation direction of the studied CMEs, which allowed us to accurately model the CME flank encounter at Earth.
Our results show the great importance of the change in the direction of propagation of the CME in the low corona when modelling CMEs and estimating the time of their arrival at Earth.