{"title":"1997-2021 年意大利东北部对羊毛脂过敏的情况:发病率、风险因素和职业影响","authors":"Luca Cegolon, F. Larese Filon","doi":"10.3390/life14080916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Direct skin contact with items containing lanolin can induce sensitization and development of contact dermatitis (CD). This multi-centric study investigated prevalence of lanolin sensitization among 30,269 outpatients from North-Eastern Italy patch tested during 1997–2021. Methods: European baseline and extended Triveneto series were applied on the upper part of patients’ back and removed after 48 h. Risk factors for lanolin sensitization were investigated by multiple logistic regression analysis, reporting adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Results. Overall lanolin patch test positive ratio (PTPR) was 1.64% (=501/30,629), with variability over time and by research center. The body area most frequently affected by CD were hands (36.32%), followed by face (19.52%) and legs (8.09%), with a lanolin PTPR of 1.68%, 1.37% and 3.07%, respectively. Prevalence of occupational CD was 8.24%, and 1.83% patients with occupational CD patch tested positive against lanolin. Lanolin sensitization was significantly higher in males (aOR = 1.34; 95%CI: 1.08; 1.65) and among patients with leg CD aged 49–60 years (aOR = 2.34; 95%CI: 1.20; 4.57) or older than 60 (aOR = 4.21; 95%CI: 2.59; 6.85). Sub-group analysis confirmed the significantly higher sensitization rate of older patients with leg CD, with much stronger effect size in females 61+ years old (aOR = 5.33; 95%CI 2.87; 9.89) than males in the same age group (aOR = 2.92; 95%CI: 1.34; 6.39). Moreover, female house painters were more likely to test positive to lanolin. Conclusions: The variability of lanolin PTPR over time and by research center endorsed the ongoing debate on the relevance of the respective skin reaction. Clinicians assessing patients with dermatitis should collect information on potential risk factors for lanolin sensitization, particularly use of skin care products containing the hapten. Occupational exposure to lanolin-containing varnishes should also be considered.","PeriodicalId":18182,"journal":{"name":"Life","volume":"34 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitization to Lanolin in North-Eastern Italy, 1997–2021: Prevalence, Risk Factors and the Impact of Occupation\",\"authors\":\"Luca Cegolon, F. Larese Filon\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/life14080916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Direct skin contact with items containing lanolin can induce sensitization and development of contact dermatitis (CD). This multi-centric study investigated prevalence of lanolin sensitization among 30,269 outpatients from North-Eastern Italy patch tested during 1997–2021. Methods: European baseline and extended Triveneto series were applied on the upper part of patients’ back and removed after 48 h. Risk factors for lanolin sensitization were investigated by multiple logistic regression analysis, reporting adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Results. Overall lanolin patch test positive ratio (PTPR) was 1.64% (=501/30,629), with variability over time and by research center. The body area most frequently affected by CD were hands (36.32%), followed by face (19.52%) and legs (8.09%), with a lanolin PTPR of 1.68%, 1.37% and 3.07%, respectively. Prevalence of occupational CD was 8.24%, and 1.83% patients with occupational CD patch tested positive against lanolin. Lanolin sensitization was significantly higher in males (aOR = 1.34; 95%CI: 1.08; 1.65) and among patients with leg CD aged 49–60 years (aOR = 2.34; 95%CI: 1.20; 4.57) or older than 60 (aOR = 4.21; 95%CI: 2.59; 6.85). Sub-group analysis confirmed the significantly higher sensitization rate of older patients with leg CD, with much stronger effect size in females 61+ years old (aOR = 5.33; 95%CI 2.87; 9.89) than males in the same age group (aOR = 2.92; 95%CI: 1.34; 6.39). Moreover, female house painters were more likely to test positive to lanolin. Conclusions: The variability of lanolin PTPR over time and by research center endorsed the ongoing debate on the relevance of the respective skin reaction. Clinicians assessing patients with dermatitis should collect information on potential risk factors for lanolin sensitization, particularly use of skin care products containing the hapten. Occupational exposure to lanolin-containing varnishes should also be considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Life\",\"volume\":\"34 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Life\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/life14080916\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/life14080916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:皮肤直接接触含有羊毛脂的物品会诱发过敏和接触性皮炎(CD)。这项多中心研究调查了 1997-2021 年间意大利东北部 30,269 名门诊病人的羊毛脂过敏症患病率。研究方法通过多重逻辑回归分析研究羊毛脂过敏的风险因素,并报告调整后的几率比(aOR)和 95% 置信区间(95%CI)。结果显示羊毛脂斑贴试验阳性率(PTPR)总体为 1.64%(=501/30629),随时间和研究中心而变化。手部(36.32%)、面部(19.52%)和腿部(8.09%)是最常受羊毛脂过敏症影响的身体部位,羊毛脂过敏症阳性率分别为 1.68%、1.37% 和 3.07%。职业性 CD 患病率为 8.24%,1.83% 的职业性 CD 患者的羊毛脂贴片检测呈阳性。男性(aOR = 1.34;95%CI:1.08;1.65)和 49-60 岁(aOR = 2.34;95%CI:1.20;4.57)或 60 岁以上(aOR = 4.21;95%CI:2.59;6.85)的腿部 CD 患者对羊毛脂过敏的比例明显更高。亚组分析证实,腿部 CD 老年患者的致敏率明显较高,61 岁以上女性(aOR = 5.33;95%CI 2.87;9.89)比同年龄组男性(aOR = 2.92;95%CI:1.34;6.39)的效应更强。此外,女性房屋油漆工对羊毛脂检测呈阳性的可能性更大。结论羊毛脂 PTPR 随时间和研究中心的不同而变化,这表明人们一直在讨论这种皮肤反应的相关性。临床医生在对皮炎患者进行评估时,应收集有关羊毛脂致敏潜在风险因素的信息,尤其是使用含有该合蛋白的护肤品的情况。还应考虑职业性接触含有羊毛脂的清漆。
Sensitization to Lanolin in North-Eastern Italy, 1997–2021: Prevalence, Risk Factors and the Impact of Occupation
Background: Direct skin contact with items containing lanolin can induce sensitization and development of contact dermatitis (CD). This multi-centric study investigated prevalence of lanolin sensitization among 30,269 outpatients from North-Eastern Italy patch tested during 1997–2021. Methods: European baseline and extended Triveneto series were applied on the upper part of patients’ back and removed after 48 h. Risk factors for lanolin sensitization were investigated by multiple logistic regression analysis, reporting adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Results. Overall lanolin patch test positive ratio (PTPR) was 1.64% (=501/30,629), with variability over time and by research center. The body area most frequently affected by CD were hands (36.32%), followed by face (19.52%) and legs (8.09%), with a lanolin PTPR of 1.68%, 1.37% and 3.07%, respectively. Prevalence of occupational CD was 8.24%, and 1.83% patients with occupational CD patch tested positive against lanolin. Lanolin sensitization was significantly higher in males (aOR = 1.34; 95%CI: 1.08; 1.65) and among patients with leg CD aged 49–60 years (aOR = 2.34; 95%CI: 1.20; 4.57) or older than 60 (aOR = 4.21; 95%CI: 2.59; 6.85). Sub-group analysis confirmed the significantly higher sensitization rate of older patients with leg CD, with much stronger effect size in females 61+ years old (aOR = 5.33; 95%CI 2.87; 9.89) than males in the same age group (aOR = 2.92; 95%CI: 1.34; 6.39). Moreover, female house painters were more likely to test positive to lanolin. Conclusions: The variability of lanolin PTPR over time and by research center endorsed the ongoing debate on the relevance of the respective skin reaction. Clinicians assessing patients with dermatitis should collect information on potential risk factors for lanolin sensitization, particularly use of skin care products containing the hapten. Occupational exposure to lanolin-containing varnishes should also be considered.