低收入国家创伤登记处的实施现状及实施障碍的促进因素:文献回顾与咨询

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Indian Journal of Medical Research Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.25259/ijmr_2420_23
Maria P. Cote, Radzi Hamzah, Isaac G. Alty, Isita Tripathi, Adriana Montalvan, Sophia M. Leonard, Jyoti Kamble, Saad Javed, Sabrina Asturias, M. Khajanchi, Nakul P. Raykar
{"title":"低收入国家创伤登记处的实施现状及实施障碍的促进因素:文献回顾与咨询","authors":"Maria P. Cote, Radzi Hamzah, Isaac G. Alty, Isita Tripathi, Adriana Montalvan, Sophia M. Leonard, Jyoti Kamble, Saad Javed, Sabrina Asturias, M. Khajanchi, Nakul P. Raykar","doi":"10.25259/ijmr_2420_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nMany low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) have attempted to implement trauma registries with varying degrees of success. This study aimed to understand the registry implementation mechanism in LMICs better. Study objectives include assessment of the current use of trauma registries in LMICs, identification of barriers to the process and potential areas for intervention, and investigation of the registry implementation experience of key stakeholders in LMICs.\n\n\n\nAn initial narrative review of articles on trauma registry use in LMICs published in English between January 2017 and September 2023 was conducted. Key findings identified in this review were used to establish a theoretical framework from which an interview guide was subsequently developed. Expert consultation with key stakeholders in trauma registry implementation in two LMICs was conducted to assess the experience of registry implementation further.\n\n\n\nThe presence of trauma registries in LMICs is limited. Key implementation barriers include funding concerns, uncoordinated administrative efforts, lack of human and physical resources (i.e., technology, equipment), and challenges in data management, analysis, and quality. Stakeholder interviews highlighted the importance of trauma registry development but echoed some obstacles, notably funding and data collection barriers.\n\n\n\nBarriers to registry implementation are ubiquitous and may contribute to the low uptake of registries in LMICs. One potential solution to these challenges is the application of the WHO International Registry for Trauma and Emergency Care. Future studies examining context-specific challenges to registry implementation and sustained utilization are required.\n","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current status of implementation of trauma registries’ in LMICs & facilitators to implementation barriers: A literature review & consultation\",\"authors\":\"Maria P. Cote, Radzi Hamzah, Isaac G. Alty, Isita Tripathi, Adriana Montalvan, Sophia M. Leonard, Jyoti Kamble, Saad Javed, Sabrina Asturias, M. Khajanchi, Nakul P. Raykar\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/ijmr_2420_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nMany low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) have attempted to implement trauma registries with varying degrees of success. This study aimed to understand the registry implementation mechanism in LMICs better. Study objectives include assessment of the current use of trauma registries in LMICs, identification of barriers to the process and potential areas for intervention, and investigation of the registry implementation experience of key stakeholders in LMICs.\\n\\n\\n\\nAn initial narrative review of articles on trauma registry use in LMICs published in English between January 2017 and September 2023 was conducted. Key findings identified in this review were used to establish a theoretical framework from which an interview guide was subsequently developed. Expert consultation with key stakeholders in trauma registry implementation in two LMICs was conducted to assess the experience of registry implementation further.\\n\\n\\n\\nThe presence of trauma registries in LMICs is limited. Key implementation barriers include funding concerns, uncoordinated administrative efforts, lack of human and physical resources (i.e., technology, equipment), and challenges in data management, analysis, and quality. Stakeholder interviews highlighted the importance of trauma registry development but echoed some obstacles, notably funding and data collection barriers.\\n\\n\\n\\nBarriers to registry implementation are ubiquitous and may contribute to the low uptake of registries in LMICs. One potential solution to these challenges is the application of the WHO International Registry for Trauma and Emergency Care. Future studies examining context-specific challenges to registry implementation and sustained utilization are required.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":13349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijmr_2420_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijmr_2420_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)都曾尝试实施创伤登记,并取得了不同程度的成功。本研究旨在更好地了解低收入和中等收入国家的登记处实施机制。研究目标包括评估创伤登记处在低收入国家和地区的当前使用情况,确定该过程的障碍和潜在的干预领域,以及调查低收入国家和地区主要利益相关者的登记处实施经验。研究人员对2017年1月至2023年9月期间发表的有关低收入国家和地区创伤登记处使用情况的英文文章进行了初步叙述性综述。综述中的主要发现被用于建立一个理论框架,随后根据该框架制定了访谈指南。为进一步评估登记册的实施经验,对两个低收入国家创伤登记册实施方面的主要利益相关者进行了专家咨询。主要的实施障碍包括资金问题、行政工作不协调、缺乏人力和物力资源(如技术、设备),以及数据管理、分析和质量方面的挑战。利益相关者在访谈中强调了建立创伤登记处的重要性,但也提到了一些障碍,尤其是资金和数据收集方面的障碍。应对这些挑战的一个潜在解决方案是应用世界卫生组织国际创伤和急救登记册。今后需要开展研究,探讨登记册实施和持续利用所面临的具体挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Current status of implementation of trauma registries’ in LMICs & facilitators to implementation barriers: A literature review & consultation
Many low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) have attempted to implement trauma registries with varying degrees of success. This study aimed to understand the registry implementation mechanism in LMICs better. Study objectives include assessment of the current use of trauma registries in LMICs, identification of barriers to the process and potential areas for intervention, and investigation of the registry implementation experience of key stakeholders in LMICs. An initial narrative review of articles on trauma registry use in LMICs published in English between January 2017 and September 2023 was conducted. Key findings identified in this review were used to establish a theoretical framework from which an interview guide was subsequently developed. Expert consultation with key stakeholders in trauma registry implementation in two LMICs was conducted to assess the experience of registry implementation further. The presence of trauma registries in LMICs is limited. Key implementation barriers include funding concerns, uncoordinated administrative efforts, lack of human and physical resources (i.e., technology, equipment), and challenges in data management, analysis, and quality. Stakeholder interviews highlighted the importance of trauma registry development but echoed some obstacles, notably funding and data collection barriers. Barriers to registry implementation are ubiquitous and may contribute to the low uptake of registries in LMICs. One potential solution to these challenges is the application of the WHO International Registry for Trauma and Emergency Care. Future studies examining context-specific challenges to registry implementation and sustained utilization are required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
191
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.
期刊最新文献
Dealing with the epidemic of drug use Regional variation in prevalence of frailty in India: Evidence from longitudinal ageing study in India (LASI) wave-1 Advances in TB diagnostics: A critical element for the elimination toolkit Current status of implementation of trauma registries’ in LMICs & facilitators to implementation barriers: A literature review & consultation Hospital level interventions to improve outcomes after injury in India, a LMIC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1