用于自动评估脊柱正面X光片上脊柱侧弯的新型人工智能程序:准确性、优点和缺点。

Дима Халед Ибрагим Кассаб
{"title":"用于自动评估脊柱正面X光片上脊柱侧弯的新型人工智能程序:准确性、优点和缺点。","authors":"Дима Халед Ибрагим Кассаб","doi":"10.17816/dd630093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Scoliosis is one of the most common spinal deformations that is usually diagnosed on frontal radiographs using Cobb’s method. The use of automatic measurement methods based on artificial intelligence can overcome many drawbacks of the usual method and can significantly save the time of the radiologist. AIM: to analyze the accuracy, advantages and disadvantages of a newly developed AI program for automatic diagnosis of scoliosis and measurement of Cobb’s angle on frontal radiographs. Methods: 112 digital radiographs were used to test the agreement of Cobb’s angle measurements between the new automatic method and the radiologist using Blant-Altman method on Microsoft Excel. A limited clinical accuracy test was also conducted using 120 radiographs. The accuracy of the system in defining the grade of scoliosis was evaluated by calculating sensitivity; specificity; accuracy; and area under the ROC curve (ROC AUC). RESULTS: The agreement of Cobb’s angle measurement between the system and the radiologist was found mostly in scoliosis with grades 1 and 2. Only 2.8% of the results were found to be unsatisfying with an angle variability of more than 5°. Diagnostic accuracy metrics of the limited clinical trial in Mariinsky city hospital had also proved the reliability of the system, with sensitivity = 0.97; specificity = 0.88; accuracy (general validity) = 0.93; area under the ROC curve (ROC AUC) = 0.93. CONCLUSION: Overall, the AI program can automatically and accurately define the grade of scoliosis and measure the angles of spinal curvatures on frontal radiographs.","PeriodicalId":34831,"journal":{"name":"Digital Diagnostics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new AI program for the automatic evaluation of scoliosis on frontal spinal radiographs: Accuracy, pros and cons.\",\"authors\":\"Дима Халед Ибрагим Кассаб\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/dd630093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Scoliosis is one of the most common spinal deformations that is usually diagnosed on frontal radiographs using Cobb’s method. The use of automatic measurement methods based on artificial intelligence can overcome many drawbacks of the usual method and can significantly save the time of the radiologist. AIM: to analyze the accuracy, advantages and disadvantages of a newly developed AI program for automatic diagnosis of scoliosis and measurement of Cobb’s angle on frontal radiographs. Methods: 112 digital radiographs were used to test the agreement of Cobb’s angle measurements between the new automatic method and the radiologist using Blant-Altman method on Microsoft Excel. A limited clinical accuracy test was also conducted using 120 radiographs. The accuracy of the system in defining the grade of scoliosis was evaluated by calculating sensitivity; specificity; accuracy; and area under the ROC curve (ROC AUC). RESULTS: The agreement of Cobb’s angle measurement between the system and the radiologist was found mostly in scoliosis with grades 1 and 2. Only 2.8% of the results were found to be unsatisfying with an angle variability of more than 5°. Diagnostic accuracy metrics of the limited clinical trial in Mariinsky city hospital had also proved the reliability of the system, with sensitivity = 0.97; specificity = 0.88; accuracy (general validity) = 0.93; area under the ROC curve (ROC AUC) = 0.93. CONCLUSION: Overall, the AI program can automatically and accurately define the grade of scoliosis and measure the angles of spinal curvatures on frontal radiographs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digital Diagnostics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digital Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/dd630093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/dd630093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脊柱侧弯是最常见的脊柱畸形之一,通常采用科布法在正面射线照片上进行诊断。使用基于人工智能的自动测量方法可以克服通常方法的许多缺点,并能大大节省放射科医生的时间。目的:分析新开发的人工智能程序自动诊断脊柱侧弯和测量额部X光片上的柯布角的准确性和优缺点。方法:使用 112 张数字 X 光片,在 Microsoft Excel 上使用 Blant-Altman 方法测试新的自动方法与放射科医生测量的 Cobb 角度的一致性。此外,还使用 120 张射线照片进行了有限的临床准确性测试。通过计算灵敏度、特异性、准确性和 ROC 曲线下面积(ROC AUC),评估了该系统在确定脊柱侧弯等级方面的准确性。结果:该系统与放射科医生的 Cobb 角度测量结果一致,主要用于 1 级和 2 级脊柱侧弯。只有 2.8% 的结果不令人满意,角度变化超过 5°。在马林斯基市医院进行的有限临床试验的诊断准确性指标也证明了该系统的可靠性,灵敏度=0.97;特异性=0.88;准确性(一般有效性)=0.93;ROC曲线下面积(ROC AUC)=0.93。结论:总的来说,人工智能程序可以自动准确地定义脊柱侧弯的等级,并测量正面X光片上的脊柱弯曲角度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new AI program for the automatic evaluation of scoliosis on frontal spinal radiographs: Accuracy, pros and cons.
BACKGROUND: Scoliosis is one of the most common spinal deformations that is usually diagnosed on frontal radiographs using Cobb’s method. The use of automatic measurement methods based on artificial intelligence can overcome many drawbacks of the usual method and can significantly save the time of the radiologist. AIM: to analyze the accuracy, advantages and disadvantages of a newly developed AI program for automatic diagnosis of scoliosis and measurement of Cobb’s angle on frontal radiographs. Methods: 112 digital radiographs were used to test the agreement of Cobb’s angle measurements between the new automatic method and the radiologist using Blant-Altman method on Microsoft Excel. A limited clinical accuracy test was also conducted using 120 radiographs. The accuracy of the system in defining the grade of scoliosis was evaluated by calculating sensitivity; specificity; accuracy; and area under the ROC curve (ROC AUC). RESULTS: The agreement of Cobb’s angle measurement between the system and the radiologist was found mostly in scoliosis with grades 1 and 2. Only 2.8% of the results were found to be unsatisfying with an angle variability of more than 5°. Diagnostic accuracy metrics of the limited clinical trial in Mariinsky city hospital had also proved the reliability of the system, with sensitivity = 0.97; specificity = 0.88; accuracy (general validity) = 0.93; area under the ROC curve (ROC AUC) = 0.93. CONCLUSION: Overall, the AI program can automatically and accurately define the grade of scoliosis and measure the angles of spinal curvatures on frontal radiographs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
A new AI program for the automatic evaluation of scoliosis on frontal spinal radiographs: Accuracy, pros and cons. Conventional and innovative imaging modalities in Bladder Cancer: techniques and applications Possibilities and limitations of MRI diagnostics of endocervical adenocarcinomas of the cervix. An unknown situs viscerum inversus totalis, accidentally discovered after a CT scan The Role of Teleradiology in Interpretation of Ultrasounds Performed in the Emergency Setting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1