印度跨学科创伤研究、宣传和实施网络就低收入和中等收入国家的急性创伤护理和结果提出的共识建议

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Indian Journal of Medical Research Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.25259/ijmr_2417_23
Nobhojit Roy, M. Khajanchi, Isaac G. Alty, Radzi Hamzah, Anna Aroke, Niladri Banerjee, Sanjeev Bhoi, Shamita Chatterjee, K. Soni, A. Gadgil, Gopalkrishna Gururaj, J. Jagnoor, Anip Joshi, M. Joshipura, Jyoti Kamble, Ajai K. Malhotra, Sarosh Mehta, Charles N. Mock, Rajashekar Mohan, Priyansh Nathani, Roopa Rawat, B. Sarang, Mohan Raj Sharma, Naveen Sharma, T. Sinha, P. Tewari, Carolina Torres Perez-Iglesias, Isita Tripathi, P. T. Leitz, Nakul P. Raykar
{"title":"印度跨学科创伤研究、宣传和实施网络就低收入和中等收入国家的急性创伤护理和结果提出的共识建议","authors":"Nobhojit Roy, M. Khajanchi, Isaac G. Alty, Radzi Hamzah, Anna Aroke, Niladri Banerjee, Sanjeev Bhoi, Shamita Chatterjee, K. Soni, A. Gadgil, Gopalkrishna Gururaj, J. Jagnoor, Anip Joshi, M. Joshipura, Jyoti Kamble, Ajai K. Malhotra, Sarosh Mehta, Charles N. Mock, Rajashekar Mohan, Priyansh Nathani, Roopa Rawat, B. Sarang, Mohan Raj Sharma, Naveen Sharma, T. Sinha, P. Tewari, Carolina Torres Perez-Iglesias, Isita Tripathi, P. T. Leitz, Nakul P. Raykar","doi":"10.25259/ijmr_2417_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nInjuries profoundly impact global health, with substantial deaths and disabilities, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper presents strategic consensus from the Transdisciplinary Research, Advocacy, and Implementation Network for Trauma in India (TRAIN Trauma India) symposium, advocating for enhanced, system-level trauma care to address this challenge.\n\n\n\nFive working groups conducted separate literature reviews on pre-hospital trauma care, in-hospital trauma resuscitation and training, trauma systems, trauma registries, and India’s Towards Improving Trauma Care Outcomes (TITCO) registry. Using a Delphi approach, the TRAIN Trauma India Symposium generated consensus statements and recommendations for interventions to streamline trauma care and reduce preventable trauma mortality in India and LMICs. Experts prioritized interventions based on cost and difficulty.\n\n\n\nAn expert panel agreed on four pre-hospital consensus statements, eight hospital resuscitation consensus statements, six system-level consensus statements, and six trauma registry consensus statements. The expert panel recommended six pre-hospital interventions, four hospital resuscitation interventions, nine system-level interventions, and seven trauma registry interventions applicable to the Indian context. Of these, 14 interventions were ranked as low cost/low difficulty, five high cost/low difficulty, five low cost/high difficulty, and three high cost/high difficulty.\n\n\n\nThis consensus underscores the urgent need for integrated and efficient trauma systems to reduce preventable mortality, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive care that includes community engagement and robust pre-hospital and acute hospital trauma care pathways. It highlights the critical role of inclusive, system-wide approaches, from enhancing pre-hospital care and in-hospital resuscitation to implementing effective trauma registries to improve outcomes and streamline care across contexts.\n","PeriodicalId":13349,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus recommendations for acute trauma care & outcomes in LMICs from the transdisciplinary research, advocacy & implementation network for trauma in India\",\"authors\":\"Nobhojit Roy, M. Khajanchi, Isaac G. Alty, Radzi Hamzah, Anna Aroke, Niladri Banerjee, Sanjeev Bhoi, Shamita Chatterjee, K. Soni, A. Gadgil, Gopalkrishna Gururaj, J. Jagnoor, Anip Joshi, M. Joshipura, Jyoti Kamble, Ajai K. Malhotra, Sarosh Mehta, Charles N. Mock, Rajashekar Mohan, Priyansh Nathani, Roopa Rawat, B. Sarang, Mohan Raj Sharma, Naveen Sharma, T. Sinha, P. Tewari, Carolina Torres Perez-Iglesias, Isita Tripathi, P. T. Leitz, Nakul P. Raykar\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/ijmr_2417_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nInjuries profoundly impact global health, with substantial deaths and disabilities, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper presents strategic consensus from the Transdisciplinary Research, Advocacy, and Implementation Network for Trauma in India (TRAIN Trauma India) symposium, advocating for enhanced, system-level trauma care to address this challenge.\\n\\n\\n\\nFive working groups conducted separate literature reviews on pre-hospital trauma care, in-hospital trauma resuscitation and training, trauma systems, trauma registries, and India’s Towards Improving Trauma Care Outcomes (TITCO) registry. Using a Delphi approach, the TRAIN Trauma India Symposium generated consensus statements and recommendations for interventions to streamline trauma care and reduce preventable trauma mortality in India and LMICs. Experts prioritized interventions based on cost and difficulty.\\n\\n\\n\\nAn expert panel agreed on four pre-hospital consensus statements, eight hospital resuscitation consensus statements, six system-level consensus statements, and six trauma registry consensus statements. The expert panel recommended six pre-hospital interventions, four hospital resuscitation interventions, nine system-level interventions, and seven trauma registry interventions applicable to the Indian context. Of these, 14 interventions were ranked as low cost/low difficulty, five high cost/low difficulty, five low cost/high difficulty, and three high cost/high difficulty.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis consensus underscores the urgent need for integrated and efficient trauma systems to reduce preventable mortality, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive care that includes community engagement and robust pre-hospital and acute hospital trauma care pathways. It highlights the critical role of inclusive, system-wide approaches, from enhancing pre-hospital care and in-hospital resuscitation to implementing effective trauma registries to improve outcomes and streamline care across contexts.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":13349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijmr_2417_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijmr_2417_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伤害严重影响全球健康,造成大量死亡和残疾,尤其是在中低收入国家(LMICs)。本文介绍了印度创伤跨学科研究、宣传和实施网络(TRAIN Trauma India)研讨会达成的战略共识,倡导加强系统级创伤救护以应对这一挑战。五个工作组分别就院前创伤救护、院内创伤复苏和培训、创伤系统、创伤登记处以及印度的 "努力改善创伤救护结果"(TITCO)登记处进行了文献综述。TRAIN 印度创伤研讨会采用德尔菲法,就印度和低收入国家/地区简化创伤救护和降低可预防的创伤死亡率的干预措施达成了共识声明和建议。专家小组就四项院前共识声明、八项医院复苏共识声明、六项系统级共识声明和六项创伤登记共识声明达成了一致意见。专家小组推荐了适用于印度情况的 6 项院前干预措施、4 项医院复苏干预措施、9 项系统级干预措施和 7 项创伤登记干预措施。该共识强调了建立综合、高效的创伤系统以降低可预防死亡率的迫切需要,并强调了包括社区参与和强有力的院前及急性医院创伤护理路径在内的全面护理的重要性。它强调了包容性全系统方法的关键作用,从加强院前护理和院内复苏到实施有效的创伤登记,以改善结果并简化不同情况下的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consensus recommendations for acute trauma care & outcomes in LMICs from the transdisciplinary research, advocacy & implementation network for trauma in India
Injuries profoundly impact global health, with substantial deaths and disabilities, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper presents strategic consensus from the Transdisciplinary Research, Advocacy, and Implementation Network for Trauma in India (TRAIN Trauma India) symposium, advocating for enhanced, system-level trauma care to address this challenge. Five working groups conducted separate literature reviews on pre-hospital trauma care, in-hospital trauma resuscitation and training, trauma systems, trauma registries, and India’s Towards Improving Trauma Care Outcomes (TITCO) registry. Using a Delphi approach, the TRAIN Trauma India Symposium generated consensus statements and recommendations for interventions to streamline trauma care and reduce preventable trauma mortality in India and LMICs. Experts prioritized interventions based on cost and difficulty. An expert panel agreed on four pre-hospital consensus statements, eight hospital resuscitation consensus statements, six system-level consensus statements, and six trauma registry consensus statements. The expert panel recommended six pre-hospital interventions, four hospital resuscitation interventions, nine system-level interventions, and seven trauma registry interventions applicable to the Indian context. Of these, 14 interventions were ranked as low cost/low difficulty, five high cost/low difficulty, five low cost/high difficulty, and three high cost/high difficulty. This consensus underscores the urgent need for integrated and efficient trauma systems to reduce preventable mortality, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive care that includes community engagement and robust pre-hospital and acute hospital trauma care pathways. It highlights the critical role of inclusive, system-wide approaches, from enhancing pre-hospital care and in-hospital resuscitation to implementing effective trauma registries to improve outcomes and streamline care across contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
191
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Medical Research (IJMR) [ISSN 0971-5916] is one of the oldest medical Journals not only in India, but probably in Asia, as it started in the year 1913. The Journal was started as a quarterly (4 issues/year) in 1913 and made bimonthly (6 issues/year) in 1958. It became monthly (12 issues/year) in the year 1964.
期刊最新文献
Dealing with the epidemic of drug use Regional variation in prevalence of frailty in India: Evidence from longitudinal ageing study in India (LASI) wave-1 Advances in TB diagnostics: A critical element for the elimination toolkit Current status of implementation of trauma registries’ in LMICs & facilitators to implementation barriers: A literature review & consultation Hospital level interventions to improve outcomes after injury in India, a LMIC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1