尼日利亚贝努埃州乌库姆的土壤特性、分类和适宜性评估,以促进玉米和山药生产

Apelebiri S., Ukabiala M. E., Ajoagu G. M., Asadu C. L. A., Ezeaku P. I.
{"title":"尼日利亚贝努埃州乌库姆的土壤特性、分类和适宜性评估,以促进玉米和山药生产","authors":"Apelebiri S., Ukabiala M. E., Ajoagu G. M., Asadu C. L. A., Ezeaku P. I.","doi":"10.52589/ajafs-jkfc8h88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil characterization, classification and evaluation provide useful information for the understanding of soil, its potentials and limitations for crop production. The study was to determine the morphological, physical and chemical properties of the soils; classify the soils; and evaluate their suitability for maize, cassava and yam production. Three land utilization types (maize, cassava and yam) with a control plot each were used for the study. One soil profile pit was dug in each land utilization type and control. The pedons were described in-situ following the procedures in FAO, s guidelines for soil profile description. A total of 23 samples were collected from the diagnostic soil horizons. The soils were classified using USDA Soil taxonomy and correlated with FAO/UNESCO World Resource Base. The suitability of the soils for maize, cassava and yam production was assessed using the non parametric and parametric methods of land evaluation. Morphologically, the soils were well drained and very deep with predominantly brownish gray (5YR5/1) and dark gray (2.5Y 5/2). The soil structures varied from weak fine granular structure to weak/moderately medium angular and sub-angular blocky structures. Soil texture varied from sand to sandy loam. The soil bulk density and total porosity varied from 1.42 to 1.72 g cm-1 and 36.98 to 46.42 %, respectively. The pH of the soils varied from slightly acidic to moderately acidic. Organic matter and total nitrogen in the soils were rated very low to low. The soils were classified at various great group levels of ultisols. The soils were moderately suitable.","PeriodicalId":474848,"journal":{"name":"African journal of agriculture and food science","volume":"107 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization, Classification and Suitability Evaluation of Soils in Ukum, Benue State, Nigeria for Maize and Yam Production\",\"authors\":\"Apelebiri S., Ukabiala M. E., Ajoagu G. M., Asadu C. L. A., Ezeaku P. I.\",\"doi\":\"10.52589/ajafs-jkfc8h88\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soil characterization, classification and evaluation provide useful information for the understanding of soil, its potentials and limitations for crop production. The study was to determine the morphological, physical and chemical properties of the soils; classify the soils; and evaluate their suitability for maize, cassava and yam production. Three land utilization types (maize, cassava and yam) with a control plot each were used for the study. One soil profile pit was dug in each land utilization type and control. The pedons were described in-situ following the procedures in FAO, s guidelines for soil profile description. A total of 23 samples were collected from the diagnostic soil horizons. The soils were classified using USDA Soil taxonomy and correlated with FAO/UNESCO World Resource Base. The suitability of the soils for maize, cassava and yam production was assessed using the non parametric and parametric methods of land evaluation. Morphologically, the soils were well drained and very deep with predominantly brownish gray (5YR5/1) and dark gray (2.5Y 5/2). The soil structures varied from weak fine granular structure to weak/moderately medium angular and sub-angular blocky structures. Soil texture varied from sand to sandy loam. The soil bulk density and total porosity varied from 1.42 to 1.72 g cm-1 and 36.98 to 46.42 %, respectively. The pH of the soils varied from slightly acidic to moderately acidic. Organic matter and total nitrogen in the soils were rated very low to low. The soils were classified at various great group levels of ultisols. The soils were moderately suitable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":474848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African journal of agriculture and food science\",\"volume\":\"107 33\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African journal of agriculture and food science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52589/ajafs-jkfc8h88\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African journal of agriculture and food science","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52589/ajafs-jkfc8h88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤表征、分类和评估为了解土壤、其在作物生产中的潜力和局限性提供了有用的信息。这项研究的目的是确定土壤的形态、物理和化学特性;对土壤进行分类;以及评估土壤对玉米、木薯和山药生产的适宜性。研究使用了三种土地利用类型(玉米、木薯和山药),每种类型都有一块对照地。每种土地利用类型和对照地都挖了一个土壤剖面坑。按照联合国粮农组织的土壤剖面描述指南中的程序,在原地对基质进行了描述。从诊断土壤层中总共采集了 23 个样本。根据美国农业部土壤分类法对土壤进行了分类,并与粮农组织/教科文组织世界资源库进行了关联。采用非参数和参数土地评估方法评估了这些土壤对玉米、木薯和山药生产的适宜性。从形态上看,这些土壤排水良好,土层深厚,主要为棕灰色(5YR5/1)和深灰色(2.5Y 5/2)。土壤结构从弱细粒结构到弱/中等角状和次角状块状结构不等。土壤质地从砂土到砂壤土不等。土壤容重和总孔隙度分别为 1.42 至 1.72 g cm-1 和 36.98 至 46.42 %。土壤的 pH 值从微酸性到中酸性不等。土壤中的有机质和总氮含量从很低到很低不等。土壤被划分为不同大类级别的超溶质土壤。土壤的适宜性为中等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterization, Classification and Suitability Evaluation of Soils in Ukum, Benue State, Nigeria for Maize and Yam Production
Soil characterization, classification and evaluation provide useful information for the understanding of soil, its potentials and limitations for crop production. The study was to determine the morphological, physical and chemical properties of the soils; classify the soils; and evaluate their suitability for maize, cassava and yam production. Three land utilization types (maize, cassava and yam) with a control plot each were used for the study. One soil profile pit was dug in each land utilization type and control. The pedons were described in-situ following the procedures in FAO, s guidelines for soil profile description. A total of 23 samples were collected from the diagnostic soil horizons. The soils were classified using USDA Soil taxonomy and correlated with FAO/UNESCO World Resource Base. The suitability of the soils for maize, cassava and yam production was assessed using the non parametric and parametric methods of land evaluation. Morphologically, the soils were well drained and very deep with predominantly brownish gray (5YR5/1) and dark gray (2.5Y 5/2). The soil structures varied from weak fine granular structure to weak/moderately medium angular and sub-angular blocky structures. Soil texture varied from sand to sandy loam. The soil bulk density and total porosity varied from 1.42 to 1.72 g cm-1 and 36.98 to 46.42 %, respectively. The pH of the soils varied from slightly acidic to moderately acidic. Organic matter and total nitrogen in the soils were rated very low to low. The soils were classified at various great group levels of ultisols. The soils were moderately suitable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rearing and Feeding Strategies of Indigenous Buffalo in Selected Areas of Bangladesh Characterization, Classification and Suitability Evaluation of Soils in Ukum, Benue State, Nigeria for Maize and Yam Production Sustainable Value Addition in Banana Cake Production as Alternative To Reduce Banana Waste Quality Evaluation of Ginger-Spiced Hibiscus Sabdariffa Drink Sweetened with Dates and Sucrose Assessment of Community Participation in Forest Conservation in Ondo State, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1