粮食安全管理的政府方法:文献计量分析

Q3 Social Sciences Environmental Economics Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.21511/ee.15(2).2024.03
Eldar Guliyev, Bayali Atashov, Aygun Guliyeva
{"title":"粮食安全管理的政府方法:文献计量分析","authors":"Eldar Guliyev, Bayali Atashov, Aygun Guliyeva","doi":"10.21511/ee.15(2).2024.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The government’s duty is to guarantee unimpeded access to food. Thus, relevant public policies, individual methods and tools, approaches, and strategic decisions are always the focus of attention of scientists, politicians, and government officials. Recognizing the critical importance of this imperative, this study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis that sheds light on the scientific landscape of strategic public administration of food security. The paper conducts a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications (using VosViewer – from 1990 to February 2024 using Scopus and WoS scientometric databases); monographs/textbooks (using Google Books and Ngram Viewer – for 1990–2019); and trend analysis (using Google Trends – from 2004 to February 2024). The analysis showed an exponential increase in the number of publications since 2000, with peaks in 2008 (financial crisis), 2019–2020 (COVID-19), and 2023 (threat to food security due to military conflicts). The clustering of scientific papers by content showed that the most significant (red) cluster unites research that links food security to agricultural development, sustainable development, climate change, and water supply. The spatial clustering of scientific publications revealed that scientific leadership belongs to scientists from the United States and China. The largest research funders are Chinese scientific institutions. It also reflected regional differences in research focus. In particular, Italy, Switzerland, and France emphasize agricultural innovation and quality standards, while China and Australia focus on increasing yields and food storage technologies.","PeriodicalId":52974,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Economics","volume":" April","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governmental approaches to food security management: A bibliometric analysis\",\"authors\":\"Eldar Guliyev, Bayali Atashov, Aygun Guliyeva\",\"doi\":\"10.21511/ee.15(2).2024.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The government’s duty is to guarantee unimpeded access to food. Thus, relevant public policies, individual methods and tools, approaches, and strategic decisions are always the focus of attention of scientists, politicians, and government officials. Recognizing the critical importance of this imperative, this study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis that sheds light on the scientific landscape of strategic public administration of food security. The paper conducts a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications (using VosViewer – from 1990 to February 2024 using Scopus and WoS scientometric databases); monographs/textbooks (using Google Books and Ngram Viewer – for 1990–2019); and trend analysis (using Google Trends – from 2004 to February 2024). The analysis showed an exponential increase in the number of publications since 2000, with peaks in 2008 (financial crisis), 2019–2020 (COVID-19), and 2023 (threat to food security due to military conflicts). The clustering of scientific papers by content showed that the most significant (red) cluster unites research that links food security to agricultural development, sustainable development, climate change, and water supply. The spatial clustering of scientific publications revealed that scientific leadership belongs to scientists from the United States and China. The largest research funders are Chinese scientific institutions. It also reflected regional differences in research focus. In particular, Italy, Switzerland, and France emphasize agricultural innovation and quality standards, while China and Australia focus on increasing yields and food storage technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Economics\",\"volume\":\" April\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.15(2).2024.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.15(2).2024.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政府的职责是保证人们能够畅通无阻地获得食物。因此,相关的公共政策、个别方法和工具、方法和战略决策始终是科学家、政治家和政府官员关注的焦点。认识到这一当务之急的极端重要性,本研究旨在进行文献计量分析,以揭示粮食安全战略公共管理的科学前景。本文对科学出版物(使用 VosViewer--1990 年至 2024 年 2 月,使用 Scopus 和 WoS 科学计量数据库)、专著/教科书(使用 Google Books 和 Ngram Viewer--1990-2019 年)以及趋势分析(使用 Google Trends--2004 年至 2024 年 2 月)进行了文献计量分析。分析表明,自 2000 年以来,论文数量呈指数增长,2008 年(金融危机)、2019-2020 年(COVID-19)和 2023 年(军事冲突对粮食安全的威胁)达到高峰。按内容对科学论文进行的聚类显示,最重要的聚类(红色)是将粮食安全与农业发展、可持续发展、气候变化和供水联系在一起的研究。科学出版物的空间聚类显示,科学领导权属于美国和中国的科学家。最大的研究资助者是中国的科研机构。这也反映了研究重点的地区差异。特别是,意大利、瑞士和法国强调农业创新和质量标准,而中国和澳大利亚则侧重于提高产量和粮食储存技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Governmental approaches to food security management: A bibliometric analysis
The government’s duty is to guarantee unimpeded access to food. Thus, relevant public policies, individual methods and tools, approaches, and strategic decisions are always the focus of attention of scientists, politicians, and government officials. Recognizing the critical importance of this imperative, this study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis that sheds light on the scientific landscape of strategic public administration of food security. The paper conducts a bibliometric analysis of scientific publications (using VosViewer – from 1990 to February 2024 using Scopus and WoS scientometric databases); monographs/textbooks (using Google Books and Ngram Viewer – for 1990–2019); and trend analysis (using Google Trends – from 2004 to February 2024). The analysis showed an exponential increase in the number of publications since 2000, with peaks in 2008 (financial crisis), 2019–2020 (COVID-19), and 2023 (threat to food security due to military conflicts). The clustering of scientific papers by content showed that the most significant (red) cluster unites research that links food security to agricultural development, sustainable development, climate change, and water supply. The spatial clustering of scientific publications revealed that scientific leadership belongs to scientists from the United States and China. The largest research funders are Chinese scientific institutions. It also reflected regional differences in research focus. In particular, Italy, Switzerland, and France emphasize agricultural innovation and quality standards, while China and Australia focus on increasing yields and food storage technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Economics
Environmental Economics Social Sciences-Public Administration
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Decarbonization in the maritime industry: Factors to create an efficient transition strategy Governmental approaches to food security management: A bibliometric analysis Implementation of eco-control system by Indonesian manufacturing firms: Understanding the mediating role of organizational culture Is corporate social responsibility effective in improving environmental quality? Literature review Evaluating the efficiency of public expenditure in municipal waste collection: A comparative study of Portuguese municipalities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1