埋在沙中的钢制管道的轴向行为:表面粗糙度和硬度的影响

Chang Guo, Chao Zhou
{"title":"埋在沙中的钢制管道的轴向行为:表面粗糙度和硬度的影响","authors":"Chang Guo, Chao Zhou","doi":"10.1680/jgeot.24.00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surface roughness and coating hardness of underground pipelines are expected to play decisive roles in their axial pullout behaviour, which is an important aspect of pipeline design. Existing guidelines and previous studies underestimated or ignored these effects, resulting in potentially unsafe design. To address this problem, the current study conducted nine large-scale physical modelling tests on pipes in dry and dense sand. Five steel pipes with varying normalised roughness (0.04-1.01) and coating hardness (32.6-59.0 HRA) were used and instrumented with a novel type of film-like piezoresistive sensors for measuring soil-pipe contact pressure. The measured pullout resistance of rough pipes is 2.70-2.85 times of smooth pipes, significantly greater than the value specified in current design guidelines (i.e., 1.17 times). This substantial increase stems from an increase in interface friction coefficient (accounting for 72-79%) and a contact pressure increase induced by constrained dilation and soil arching (contributing the remaining 21-28%). Regarding coating hardness, a critical hardness was observed (around 35 HRA). Due to equivalent roughness from particle embedding, pipes with hardness below this value exhibited similar behaviour to rough pipes. Finally, a new and simple method was proposed for calculating the pullout resistance with consideration of the effects of roughness and dilatancy.","PeriodicalId":508398,"journal":{"name":"Géotechnique","volume":" 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Axial behaviour of steel pipelines buried in sand: effects of surface roughness and hardness\",\"authors\":\"Chang Guo, Chao Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jgeot.24.00001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Surface roughness and coating hardness of underground pipelines are expected to play decisive roles in their axial pullout behaviour, which is an important aspect of pipeline design. Existing guidelines and previous studies underestimated or ignored these effects, resulting in potentially unsafe design. To address this problem, the current study conducted nine large-scale physical modelling tests on pipes in dry and dense sand. Five steel pipes with varying normalised roughness (0.04-1.01) and coating hardness (32.6-59.0 HRA) were used and instrumented with a novel type of film-like piezoresistive sensors for measuring soil-pipe contact pressure. The measured pullout resistance of rough pipes is 2.70-2.85 times of smooth pipes, significantly greater than the value specified in current design guidelines (i.e., 1.17 times). This substantial increase stems from an increase in interface friction coefficient (accounting for 72-79%) and a contact pressure increase induced by constrained dilation and soil arching (contributing the remaining 21-28%). Regarding coating hardness, a critical hardness was observed (around 35 HRA). Due to equivalent roughness from particle embedding, pipes with hardness below this value exhibited similar behaviour to rough pipes. Finally, a new and simple method was proposed for calculating the pullout resistance with consideration of the effects of roughness and dilatancy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Géotechnique\",\"volume\":\" 27\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Géotechnique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.24.00001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Géotechnique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.24.00001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地下管道的表面粗糙度和涂层硬度预计会对其轴向拉拔行为起到决定性作用,这是管道设计的一个重要方面。现有指南和以前的研究低估或忽略了这些影响,导致设计可能不安全。为解决这一问题,本研究对干燥和致密沙中的管道进行了九次大规模物理建模测试。使用了五根具有不同归一化粗糙度(0.04-1.01)和涂层硬度(32.6-59.0 HRA)的钢管,并用一种新型薄膜状压阻传感器测量土壤-管道接触压力。测得的粗糙管道的抗拔力是光滑管道的 2.70-2.85 倍,大大高于现行设计准则中规定的数值(即 1.17 倍)。这一大幅增加源于界面摩擦系数的增加(占 72-79%)以及受限扩张和土壤拱起引起的接触压力增加(占其余的 21-28%)。关于涂层硬度,观察到一个临界硬度(约 35 HRA)。由于颗粒嵌入造成的等效粗糙度,硬度低于该值的管道表现出与粗糙管道类似的行为。最后,考虑到粗糙度和扩张性的影响,我们提出了一种新的简单方法来计算抗拉强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Axial behaviour of steel pipelines buried in sand: effects of surface roughness and hardness
Surface roughness and coating hardness of underground pipelines are expected to play decisive roles in their axial pullout behaviour, which is an important aspect of pipeline design. Existing guidelines and previous studies underestimated or ignored these effects, resulting in potentially unsafe design. To address this problem, the current study conducted nine large-scale physical modelling tests on pipes in dry and dense sand. Five steel pipes with varying normalised roughness (0.04-1.01) and coating hardness (32.6-59.0 HRA) were used and instrumented with a novel type of film-like piezoresistive sensors for measuring soil-pipe contact pressure. The measured pullout resistance of rough pipes is 2.70-2.85 times of smooth pipes, significantly greater than the value specified in current design guidelines (i.e., 1.17 times). This substantial increase stems from an increase in interface friction coefficient (accounting for 72-79%) and a contact pressure increase induced by constrained dilation and soil arching (contributing the remaining 21-28%). Regarding coating hardness, a critical hardness was observed (around 35 HRA). Due to equivalent roughness from particle embedding, pipes with hardness below this value exhibited similar behaviour to rough pipes. Finally, a new and simple method was proposed for calculating the pullout resistance with consideration of the effects of roughness and dilatancy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Axial behaviour of steel pipelines buried in sand: effects of surface roughness and hardness Development of a new soil-structure contact stress sensor for underground construction applications Quantification of spatial heterogeneity and its influence on particle migration Particle tracking–aided digital volume correlation for clay-sand soil mixtures Maximum shear modulus anisotropy of rooted soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1