多囊卵巢综合征患者首次促排卵周期中的延长来曲唑方案与常规来曲唑方案:前瞻性随机对照试验

IF 8.3 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Human reproduction open Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1093/hropen/hoae046
Xiuxian Zhu, Jingwen Lang, Qiaoling Wang, Yonglun Fu
{"title":"多囊卵巢综合征患者首次促排卵周期中的延长来曲唑方案与常规来曲唑方案:前瞻性随机对照试验","authors":"Xiuxian Zhu, Jingwen Lang, Qiaoling Wang, Yonglun Fu","doi":"10.1093/hropen/hoae046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Can an extended letrozole regimen result in a higher ovulatory rate than a conventional regimen in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing their first ovulation induction cycle?\n \n \n \n There was no statistical difference in ovulation rate between patients with PCOS using the extended letrozole regimen and those using the conventional letrozole regimen.\n \n \n \n Letrozole has become the first-line agent for ovulation induction. However, there is still a proportion of non-responsive cycles in patients with PCOS undergoing ovulation induction therapy with letrozole alone, and the extended letrozole regimen has been demonstrated to be a feasible method for inducing ovulation in these non-responders. Nevertheless, whether the extended regimen could be applied to all patients with PCOS as a first choice for the induction of ovulation remains to be explored.\n \n \n \n This was a prospective randomized controlled trial that included 148 female patients with PCOS who underwent their first ovulation induction cycle with letrozole from January 2021 to October 2022.\n \n \n \n Participants were randomly assigned to receive an extended (5 mg letrozole daily for 7 days) or conventional regimen (5 mg letrozole daily for 5 days) for one treatment cycle. The ovulation rate was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the clinical pregnancy rate, the number of preovulatory follicles, and the rate of multiple pregnancies.\n \n \n \n The ovulation rate among patients receiving an extended letrozole regimen was slightly higher than the rate with a conventional letrozole regimen, but the difference did not reach statistical significance in either the intention-to-treat analysis (90.54% [67/74] vs 79.73% [59/74], P = 0.065; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.881 [0.768-1.009]) or per-protocol analysis (90.54% [67/74] vs 84.29% [59/70], P = 0.257; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.931 [0.821-1.055]). The number of preovulatory follicles was nearly identical in the two groups (1.39±0.62 vs 1.37±0.59, P = 0.956), and no cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were observed. With regards to the endometrial parameters, the mean endometrium thickness was slightly thicker with the conventional LE regimen compared to that with the extended LE regimen, though with no statistical difference (9.27±1.72mm vs 9.57±2.28mm, P = 0.792). In the per-protocol analysis, the rates of clinical pregnancy (20.27% [15/74] vs 14.29% [10/70], P = 0.343; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.705 [0.34-1.463]) and live birth (13.51% [10/74] vs 11.43% [8/70], P = 0.705; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.846 [0.354-2.019]) did not differ significantly between treatment groups. Moreover, all conceptions were singletons without neonatal defects.\n \n \n \n The major concerns regarding this study are its single-centre and open-label nature. Additionally, the limited number of lean patients with PCOS with a mean body mass index of 23-25 kg/m2 enrolled in our trial also restricted the generalizability of our findings.\n \n \n \n A change from the standard strategy of ovulation induction in patients with PCOS is not advisable, because a statistically superior effect of the extended LE regimen over a conventional regimen was not detected. The extended LE regimen could be applied with caution in a specific population who failed to respond to a conventional regimen rather than all the patients with PCOS during ovulation induction. Additional prospective trials with larger sample sizes and different PCOS subgroups are needed to assess the ovulatory effects of various letrozole treatment durations.\n \n \n \n This study was funded by the Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, affiliated with Tongji University School of Medicine (grant numbers: 2023B03 to Y.F., 2023B18 to X.Z., and 2020RC02 to Y.F.). The authors report no conflicts of interest.\n \n \n \n Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100042082).\n \n \n \n January 13, 2021.\n \n \n \n January 21, 2021.\n","PeriodicalId":73264,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extended versus conventional letrozole regimen in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing their first ovulation induction cycle: a prospective randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Xiuxian Zhu, Jingwen Lang, Qiaoling Wang, Yonglun Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/hropen/hoae046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Can an extended letrozole regimen result in a higher ovulatory rate than a conventional regimen in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing their first ovulation induction cycle?\\n \\n \\n \\n There was no statistical difference in ovulation rate between patients with PCOS using the extended letrozole regimen and those using the conventional letrozole regimen.\\n \\n \\n \\n Letrozole has become the first-line agent for ovulation induction. However, there is still a proportion of non-responsive cycles in patients with PCOS undergoing ovulation induction therapy with letrozole alone, and the extended letrozole regimen has been demonstrated to be a feasible method for inducing ovulation in these non-responders. Nevertheless, whether the extended regimen could be applied to all patients with PCOS as a first choice for the induction of ovulation remains to be explored.\\n \\n \\n \\n This was a prospective randomized controlled trial that included 148 female patients with PCOS who underwent their first ovulation induction cycle with letrozole from January 2021 to October 2022.\\n \\n \\n \\n Participants were randomly assigned to receive an extended (5 mg letrozole daily for 7 days) or conventional regimen (5 mg letrozole daily for 5 days) for one treatment cycle. The ovulation rate was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the clinical pregnancy rate, the number of preovulatory follicles, and the rate of multiple pregnancies.\\n \\n \\n \\n The ovulation rate among patients receiving an extended letrozole regimen was slightly higher than the rate with a conventional letrozole regimen, but the difference did not reach statistical significance in either the intention-to-treat analysis (90.54% [67/74] vs 79.73% [59/74], P = 0.065; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.881 [0.768-1.009]) or per-protocol analysis (90.54% [67/74] vs 84.29% [59/70], P = 0.257; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.931 [0.821-1.055]). The number of preovulatory follicles was nearly identical in the two groups (1.39±0.62 vs 1.37±0.59, P = 0.956), and no cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were observed. With regards to the endometrial parameters, the mean endometrium thickness was slightly thicker with the conventional LE regimen compared to that with the extended LE regimen, though with no statistical difference (9.27±1.72mm vs 9.57±2.28mm, P = 0.792). In the per-protocol analysis, the rates of clinical pregnancy (20.27% [15/74] vs 14.29% [10/70], P = 0.343; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.705 [0.34-1.463]) and live birth (13.51% [10/74] vs 11.43% [8/70], P = 0.705; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.846 [0.354-2.019]) did not differ significantly between treatment groups. Moreover, all conceptions were singletons without neonatal defects.\\n \\n \\n \\n The major concerns regarding this study are its single-centre and open-label nature. Additionally, the limited number of lean patients with PCOS with a mean body mass index of 23-25 kg/m2 enrolled in our trial also restricted the generalizability of our findings.\\n \\n \\n \\n A change from the standard strategy of ovulation induction in patients with PCOS is not advisable, because a statistically superior effect of the extended LE regimen over a conventional regimen was not detected. The extended LE regimen could be applied with caution in a specific population who failed to respond to a conventional regimen rather than all the patients with PCOS during ovulation induction. Additional prospective trials with larger sample sizes and different PCOS subgroups are needed to assess the ovulatory effects of various letrozole treatment durations.\\n \\n \\n \\n This study was funded by the Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, affiliated with Tongji University School of Medicine (grant numbers: 2023B03 to Y.F., 2023B18 to X.Z., and 2020RC02 to Y.F.). The authors report no conflicts of interest.\\n \\n \\n \\n Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100042082).\\n \\n \\n \\n January 13, 2021.\\n \\n \\n \\n January 21, 2021.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":73264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human reproduction open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human reproduction open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoae046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoae046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于首次接受促排卵周期治疗的多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者来说,延长来曲唑治疗方案能否比常规治疗方案带来更高的排卵率? 使用延长来曲唑治疗方案的多囊卵巢综合征患者与使用常规来曲唑治疗方案的患者在排卵率方面没有统计学差异。 来曲唑已成为促排卵的一线药物。然而,在单独使用来曲唑进行促排卵治疗的多囊卵巢综合征患者中,仍有一定比例的无应答周期,而扩展来曲唑方案已被证明是诱导这些无应答者排卵的可行方法。然而,是否所有多囊卵巢综合征患者都能将延长方案作为诱导排卵的首选方案,仍有待探讨。 这是一项前瞻性随机对照试验,共纳入了148名女性多囊卵巢综合征患者,她们在2021年1月至2022年10月期间接受了来曲唑的首个促排卵周期。 参与者被随机分配到一个治疗周期内接受延长方案(每天 5 毫克来曲唑,持续 7 天)或常规方案(每天 5 毫克来曲唑,持续 5 天)。排卵率是主要结果。次要结果包括临床妊娠率、排卵前卵泡数和多胎妊娠率。 采用延长来曲唑治疗方案的患者的排卵率略高于采用常规来曲唑治疗方案的患者,但在意向治疗分析中,两者的差异均未达到统计学意义(90.54% [67/74] vs 79.73% [59/74],P = 0.065;相对风险[95% 置信区间]:0.881 [0.7%] [0.881]):0.881[0.768-1.009])或按协议分析(90.54% [67/74] vs 84.29% [59/70],P = 0.257;相对风险[95% 置信区间]:0.931 [0.898]):0.931 [0.821-1.055]).两组患者的排卵前卵泡数量几乎相同(1.39±0.62 vs 1.37±0.59,P = 0.956),且未观察到卵巢过度刺激综合征病例。在子宫内膜参数方面,常规 LE 方案的平均子宫内膜厚度略厚于延长 LE 方案,但无统计学差异(9.27±1.72 mm vs 9.57±2.28mm,P = 0.792)。在按方案分析中,临床妊娠率(20.27% [15/74] vs 14.29% [10/70],P = 0.343;相对风险[95% 置信区间]:0.705 [0.345治疗组之间的差异不大。此外,所有受孕者均为无新生儿缺陷的单胎。 这项研究的主要问题在于其单中心和开放标签的性质。此外,参与试验的多囊卵巢综合症瘦弱患者人数有限,平均体重指数为 23-25 kg/m2,这也限制了研究结果的推广性。 在多囊卵巢综合症患者中改变标准促排卵策略并不可取,因为在统计学上,延长的LE方案的效果并没有优于常规方案。在诱导排卵过程中,对于常规方案无效的特定人群,而非所有多囊卵巢综合症患者,可谨慎使用延长的 LE 方案。需要进行更多的前瞻性试验来评估不同来曲唑疗程对排卵的影响,这些试验需要更大的样本量和不同的多囊卵巢综合征亚组。 本研究由同济大学医学院附属上海市第一妇婴保健院资助(资助编号:2023B03-Y.F.、2023B18-X.Z.、2020RC02-Y.F.)。作者不存在利益冲突。 中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2100042082)。 2021 年 1 月 13 日。 2021 年 1 月 21 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extended versus conventional letrozole regimen in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing their first ovulation induction cycle: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Can an extended letrozole regimen result in a higher ovulatory rate than a conventional regimen in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing their first ovulation induction cycle? There was no statistical difference in ovulation rate between patients with PCOS using the extended letrozole regimen and those using the conventional letrozole regimen. Letrozole has become the first-line agent for ovulation induction. However, there is still a proportion of non-responsive cycles in patients with PCOS undergoing ovulation induction therapy with letrozole alone, and the extended letrozole regimen has been demonstrated to be a feasible method for inducing ovulation in these non-responders. Nevertheless, whether the extended regimen could be applied to all patients with PCOS as a first choice for the induction of ovulation remains to be explored. This was a prospective randomized controlled trial that included 148 female patients with PCOS who underwent their first ovulation induction cycle with letrozole from January 2021 to October 2022. Participants were randomly assigned to receive an extended (5 mg letrozole daily for 7 days) or conventional regimen (5 mg letrozole daily for 5 days) for one treatment cycle. The ovulation rate was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the clinical pregnancy rate, the number of preovulatory follicles, and the rate of multiple pregnancies. The ovulation rate among patients receiving an extended letrozole regimen was slightly higher than the rate with a conventional letrozole regimen, but the difference did not reach statistical significance in either the intention-to-treat analysis (90.54% [67/74] vs 79.73% [59/74], P = 0.065; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.881 [0.768-1.009]) or per-protocol analysis (90.54% [67/74] vs 84.29% [59/70], P = 0.257; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.931 [0.821-1.055]). The number of preovulatory follicles was nearly identical in the two groups (1.39±0.62 vs 1.37±0.59, P = 0.956), and no cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were observed. With regards to the endometrial parameters, the mean endometrium thickness was slightly thicker with the conventional LE regimen compared to that with the extended LE regimen, though with no statistical difference (9.27±1.72mm vs 9.57±2.28mm, P = 0.792). In the per-protocol analysis, the rates of clinical pregnancy (20.27% [15/74] vs 14.29% [10/70], P = 0.343; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.705 [0.34-1.463]) and live birth (13.51% [10/74] vs 11.43% [8/70], P = 0.705; relative risk [95% confidence interval]: 0.846 [0.354-2.019]) did not differ significantly between treatment groups. Moreover, all conceptions were singletons without neonatal defects. The major concerns regarding this study are its single-centre and open-label nature. Additionally, the limited number of lean patients with PCOS with a mean body mass index of 23-25 kg/m2 enrolled in our trial also restricted the generalizability of our findings. A change from the standard strategy of ovulation induction in patients with PCOS is not advisable, because a statistically superior effect of the extended LE regimen over a conventional regimen was not detected. The extended LE regimen could be applied with caution in a specific population who failed to respond to a conventional regimen rather than all the patients with PCOS during ovulation induction. Additional prospective trials with larger sample sizes and different PCOS subgroups are needed to assess the ovulatory effects of various letrozole treatment durations. This study was funded by the Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, affiliated with Tongji University School of Medicine (grant numbers: 2023B03 to Y.F., 2023B18 to X.Z., and 2020RC02 to Y.F.). The authors report no conflicts of interest. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100042082). January 13, 2021. January 21, 2021.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sperm and leukocyte telomere length are related to sperm quality parameters in healthy men from the Led-Fertyl study. Reply: Emerging evidence of endometrial compaction in predicting ART outcomes. Emerging evidence of endometrial compaction in predicting ART outcomes. Steady morphokinetic progression is an independent predictor of live birth: a descriptive reference for euploid embryos. Effects of ovarian stimulation on embryo euploidy: an analysis of 12 874 oocytes and 3106 blastocysts in cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1