筑巢地植被结构影响泰国东北部常绿干林下鸟类的捕食者和筑巢成功率

Marisa Phringphroh, D. Khamcha, Wangworn Sankamethawee, L. Powell, Rongrong Angkaew, A. J. Pierce, G. Gale
{"title":"筑巢地植被结构影响泰国东北部常绿干林下鸟类的捕食者和筑巢成功率","authors":"Marisa Phringphroh, D. Khamcha, Wangworn Sankamethawee, L. Powell, Rongrong Angkaew, A. J. Pierce, G. Gale","doi":"10.1093/ornithology/ukae031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Nest predation is typically the main cause of nest failure in forest understory birds; thus, identification of primary nest predators is key to understanding nest predation patterns. Furthermore, responses of predators are likely affected by vegetation structure, but predator responses to micro-scale habitat characteristics are largely unknown, especially in tropical forests. We used a long-term study with one of the largest datasets of its kind to investigate the extent to which micro-habitat structure (5-m radius surrounding a nest) can predict the likelihood of predation and by which predator. In a secondary evergreen forest in northeastern Thailand, 2013–2021, we found 1,016 active nests of 13 species and 24-hr video-monitored 500 of them. We recorded 336 predation events from 16 nest predator species. From this and previous studies at our site, we identified the top 4 predator species/species-groups accounting for ~83% of predation events: Macaca leonina (northern pig-tailed macaque, 36% of predation events), cat snakes (Boiga cyanea [green cat snake] and Boiga siamensis [grey cat snake]) (20%), Lycodon cf. davisonii (Blandford’s bridle snake, 18%), and accipiters (A. trivirgatus [Crested Goshawk] and A. badius [Shikra]) (9%). These 4 predator species differed in their responses to vegetation structure likely reflecting differences in foraging behaviors. Macaque and accipiters, both diurnal and visually-oriented, tended to depredate more visible/open nests, but macaques depredated nests surrounded by more trees and short woody stems (<3 m tall) compared to raptors. For snakes, both nocturnal, cat snakes depredated nests with higher numbers of both short woody stems and woody climbers, whereas bridle snakes depredated nests with more trees and fewer climbers. As noted previously, nest predator identity is critical to understanding habitat-predation patterns. Our data suggest that nest site vegetation characteristics influence the likelihood of a given species of predator locating a nest and that even small changes in vegetation structure could significantly alter predation patterns.","PeriodicalId":19617,"journal":{"name":"Ornithology","volume":"171 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nest site vegetation structure influences nest predators and nesting success of understory birds in a dry evergreen forest in northeastern Thailand\",\"authors\":\"Marisa Phringphroh, D. Khamcha, Wangworn Sankamethawee, L. Powell, Rongrong Angkaew, A. J. Pierce, G. Gale\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ornithology/ukae031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Nest predation is typically the main cause of nest failure in forest understory birds; thus, identification of primary nest predators is key to understanding nest predation patterns. Furthermore, responses of predators are likely affected by vegetation structure, but predator responses to micro-scale habitat characteristics are largely unknown, especially in tropical forests. We used a long-term study with one of the largest datasets of its kind to investigate the extent to which micro-habitat structure (5-m radius surrounding a nest) can predict the likelihood of predation and by which predator. In a secondary evergreen forest in northeastern Thailand, 2013–2021, we found 1,016 active nests of 13 species and 24-hr video-monitored 500 of them. We recorded 336 predation events from 16 nest predator species. From this and previous studies at our site, we identified the top 4 predator species/species-groups accounting for ~83% of predation events: Macaca leonina (northern pig-tailed macaque, 36% of predation events), cat snakes (Boiga cyanea [green cat snake] and Boiga siamensis [grey cat snake]) (20%), Lycodon cf. davisonii (Blandford’s bridle snake, 18%), and accipiters (A. trivirgatus [Crested Goshawk] and A. badius [Shikra]) (9%). These 4 predator species differed in their responses to vegetation structure likely reflecting differences in foraging behaviors. Macaque and accipiters, both diurnal and visually-oriented, tended to depredate more visible/open nests, but macaques depredated nests surrounded by more trees and short woody stems (<3 m tall) compared to raptors. For snakes, both nocturnal, cat snakes depredated nests with higher numbers of both short woody stems and woody climbers, whereas bridle snakes depredated nests with more trees and fewer climbers. As noted previously, nest predator identity is critical to understanding habitat-predation patterns. Our data suggest that nest site vegetation characteristics influence the likelihood of a given species of predator locating a nest and that even small changes in vegetation structure could significantly alter predation patterns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ornithology\",\"volume\":\"171 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ornithology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithology/ukae031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ornithology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithology/ukae031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鸟巢捕食通常是林下鸟类筑巢失败的主要原因;因此,识别主要的鸟巢捕食者是了解鸟巢捕食模式的关键。此外,捕食者的反应很可能受到植被结构的影响,但捕食者对微观尺度生境特征的反应在很大程度上是未知的,尤其是在热带森林中。我们利用同类研究中最大的数据集之一进行了一项长期研究,以调查微观生境结构(巢周围半径为5米)在多大程度上可以预测捕食的可能性以及捕食者。2013-2021年,我们在泰国东北部的常绿次生林中发现了13个物种的1016个活跃巢穴,并对其中的500个巢穴进行了24小时视频监控。我们记录了来自 16 种巢穴捕食者的 336 次捕食事件。通过这次研究和以前在我们地点进行的研究,我们确定了占捕食事件约 83% 的前 4 个捕食者物种/物种群:Macaca leonina(北方猪尾猕猴,占捕食事件的 36%)、猫蛇(Boiga cyanea [绿猫蛇] 和 Boiga siamensis [灰猫蛇])(20%)、Lycodon cf. davisonii(布兰福德桥蛇,18%)和讪蛇(A. trivirgatus [凤头鹰] 和 A. badius [Shikra])(9%)。这 4 种食肉动物对植被结构的反应不同,可能反映了它们觅食行为的差异。猕猴和食蚁兽都是昼伏夜出、以视觉为导向的动物,它们倾向于破坏更明显/更开阔的巢穴,但与猛禽相比,猕猴破坏的巢穴周围有更多的树木和矮木质茎(<3米高)。在蛇类方面,夜间活动的猫蛇和鬃蛇都会掠食短木质茎和木质攀援物较多的巢穴,而桥蛇则会掠食树木较多、攀援物较少的巢穴。如前所述,巢内捕食者的身份对于了解栖息地捕食模式至关重要。我们的数据表明,巢址植被特征会影响特定种类的捕食者找到巢的可能性,即使植被结构的微小变化也会显著改变捕食模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nest site vegetation structure influences nest predators and nesting success of understory birds in a dry evergreen forest in northeastern Thailand
Nest predation is typically the main cause of nest failure in forest understory birds; thus, identification of primary nest predators is key to understanding nest predation patterns. Furthermore, responses of predators are likely affected by vegetation structure, but predator responses to micro-scale habitat characteristics are largely unknown, especially in tropical forests. We used a long-term study with one of the largest datasets of its kind to investigate the extent to which micro-habitat structure (5-m radius surrounding a nest) can predict the likelihood of predation and by which predator. In a secondary evergreen forest in northeastern Thailand, 2013–2021, we found 1,016 active nests of 13 species and 24-hr video-monitored 500 of them. We recorded 336 predation events from 16 nest predator species. From this and previous studies at our site, we identified the top 4 predator species/species-groups accounting for ~83% of predation events: Macaca leonina (northern pig-tailed macaque, 36% of predation events), cat snakes (Boiga cyanea [green cat snake] and Boiga siamensis [grey cat snake]) (20%), Lycodon cf. davisonii (Blandford’s bridle snake, 18%), and accipiters (A. trivirgatus [Crested Goshawk] and A. badius [Shikra]) (9%). These 4 predator species differed in their responses to vegetation structure likely reflecting differences in foraging behaviors. Macaque and accipiters, both diurnal and visually-oriented, tended to depredate more visible/open nests, but macaques depredated nests surrounded by more trees and short woody stems (<3 m tall) compared to raptors. For snakes, both nocturnal, cat snakes depredated nests with higher numbers of both short woody stems and woody climbers, whereas bridle snakes depredated nests with more trees and fewer climbers. As noted previously, nest predator identity is critical to understanding habitat-predation patterns. Our data suggest that nest site vegetation characteristics influence the likelihood of a given species of predator locating a nest and that even small changes in vegetation structure could significantly alter predation patterns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blue-footed Boobies: Sibling Conflict and Sexual Infidelity on a Tropical Island The Great Rift Valley is a more pronounced biogeographic barrier than the Blue Nile Valley for six Ethiopian Highland passerines in the eastern Afromontane biodiversity hotspot The Birds That Audubon Missed: Discovery and Desire in the American Wilderness A late Pleistocene nest cave of Gymnogyps californianus (California Condor) in Texas: New radiocarbon and stable isotope analyses Sixty-fifth Supplement to the American Ornithological Society’s Check-list of North American Birds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1