人种学方法:培训规范与实践以及美国人类学的未来

IF 2.6 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY American Anthropologist Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1111/aman.13991
Rosalyn Negrón, Amber Wutich, H. Russell Bernard, Alexandra Brewis, Alissa Ruth, Katherine Mayfour, Barbara Piperata, Melissa Beresford, Cindi SturtzSreetharan, Pardis Mahdavi, Jessica Hardin, Rebecca Zarger, Krista Harper, James Holland Jones, Clarence C. Gravlee, Bryan Brayboy
{"title":"人种学方法:培训规范与实践以及美国人类学的未来","authors":"Rosalyn Negrón,&nbsp;Amber Wutich,&nbsp;H. Russell Bernard,&nbsp;Alexandra Brewis,&nbsp;Alissa Ruth,&nbsp;Katherine Mayfour,&nbsp;Barbara Piperata,&nbsp;Melissa Beresford,&nbsp;Cindi SturtzSreetharan,&nbsp;Pardis Mahdavi,&nbsp;Jessica Hardin,&nbsp;Rebecca Zarger,&nbsp;Krista Harper,&nbsp;James Holland Jones,&nbsp;Clarence C. Gravlee,&nbsp;Bryan Brayboy","doi":"10.1111/aman.13991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>American anthropology is engaged in significant self-reckonings that call for big changes to how anthropology is practiced. These include (1) recognizing and taking seriously the demands to decolonize the ways research is done, (2) addressing precarious employment in academic anthropology, and (3) creating a discipline better positioned to respond to urgent societal needs. A central role for ethnographic methods training is a thread that runs through each of these three reckonings. This article, written by a team of cultural, biocultural, and linguistic anthropologists, outlines key connections between ethnographic methods training and the challenges facing anthropology. We draw on insights from a large-scale survey of American Anthropological Association members to examine current ethnographic methods capabilities and training practices. Study findings are presented and explored to answer three guiding questions: To what extent do our current anthropological practices in ethnographic methods training serve to advance or undermine current calls for disciplinary change? To what extent do instructors themselves identify disconnects between their own practices and the need for innovation? And, finally, what can be done, and at what scale, to leverage ethnographic methods training to meet calls for disciplinary change?</p>","PeriodicalId":7697,"journal":{"name":"American Anthropologist","volume":"126 3","pages":"458-469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.13991","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethnographic methods: Training norms and practices and the future of American anthropology\",\"authors\":\"Rosalyn Negrón,&nbsp;Amber Wutich,&nbsp;H. Russell Bernard,&nbsp;Alexandra Brewis,&nbsp;Alissa Ruth,&nbsp;Katherine Mayfour,&nbsp;Barbara Piperata,&nbsp;Melissa Beresford,&nbsp;Cindi SturtzSreetharan,&nbsp;Pardis Mahdavi,&nbsp;Jessica Hardin,&nbsp;Rebecca Zarger,&nbsp;Krista Harper,&nbsp;James Holland Jones,&nbsp;Clarence C. Gravlee,&nbsp;Bryan Brayboy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aman.13991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>American anthropology is engaged in significant self-reckonings that call for big changes to how anthropology is practiced. These include (1) recognizing and taking seriously the demands to decolonize the ways research is done, (2) addressing precarious employment in academic anthropology, and (3) creating a discipline better positioned to respond to urgent societal needs. A central role for ethnographic methods training is a thread that runs through each of these three reckonings. This article, written by a team of cultural, biocultural, and linguistic anthropologists, outlines key connections between ethnographic methods training and the challenges facing anthropology. We draw on insights from a large-scale survey of American Anthropological Association members to examine current ethnographic methods capabilities and training practices. Study findings are presented and explored to answer three guiding questions: To what extent do our current anthropological practices in ethnographic methods training serve to advance or undermine current calls for disciplinary change? To what extent do instructors themselves identify disconnects between their own practices and the need for innovation? And, finally, what can be done, and at what scale, to leverage ethnographic methods training to meet calls for disciplinary change?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Anthropologist\",\"volume\":\"126 3\",\"pages\":\"458-469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aman.13991\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Anthropologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aman.13991\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Anthropologist","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aman.13991","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国人类学正在进行重大的自我反思,要求对人类学的实践方式进行重大变革。其中包括:(1)认识到并认真对待研究方式非殖民化的要求;(2)解决人类学学术界就业不稳定的问题;(3)创建一门能够更好地应对社会迫切需求的学科。人种学方法培训的核心作用是贯穿这三项思考的一条主线。本文由一个由文化、生物文化和语言人类学家组成的团队撰写,概述了民族学方法培训与人类学面临的挑战之间的主要联系。我们从对美国人类学协会会员的大规模调查中汲取灵感,考察了当前民族学方法的能力和培训实践。我们介绍并探讨了研究结果,以回答三个指导性问题:目前人类学在民族志方法培训方面的做法在多大程度上促进或削弱了当前的学科变革呼声?在多大程度上,讲师们自己发现了自身实践与创新需求之间的脱节?最后,如何利用民族学方法培训来满足学科变革的要求?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethnographic methods: Training norms and practices and the future of American anthropology

American anthropology is engaged in significant self-reckonings that call for big changes to how anthropology is practiced. These include (1) recognizing and taking seriously the demands to decolonize the ways research is done, (2) addressing precarious employment in academic anthropology, and (3) creating a discipline better positioned to respond to urgent societal needs. A central role for ethnographic methods training is a thread that runs through each of these three reckonings. This article, written by a team of cultural, biocultural, and linguistic anthropologists, outlines key connections between ethnographic methods training and the challenges facing anthropology. We draw on insights from a large-scale survey of American Anthropological Association members to examine current ethnographic methods capabilities and training practices. Study findings are presented and explored to answer three guiding questions: To what extent do our current anthropological practices in ethnographic methods training serve to advance or undermine current calls for disciplinary change? To what extent do instructors themselves identify disconnects between their own practices and the need for innovation? And, finally, what can be done, and at what scale, to leverage ethnographic methods training to meet calls for disciplinary change?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Anthropologist
American Anthropologist ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: American Anthropologist is the flagship journal of the American Anthropological Association, reaching well over 12,000 readers with each issue. The journal advances the Association mission through publishing articles that add to, integrate, synthesize, and interpret anthropological knowledge; commentaries and essays on issues of importance to the discipline; and reviews of books, films, sound recordings and exhibits.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Toward an anthropology that cares: Lessons from the Academic Carework project Parenting and the production of ethnographic knowledge Why I quit and why I stay Paul Edward Farmer (1959–2022)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1