磷灰石裂变轨道定年:自动计数 LA-ICP-MS 和外部探测器方法获得的年龄比较研究

IF 1.8 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Lithosphere Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.2113/2023/lithosphere_2023_260
R. Lugo-Zazueta, A. Gleadow, Barry P. Kohn, H. Sahu, Mauricio A. Bermúdez
{"title":"磷灰石裂变轨道定年:自动计数 LA-ICP-MS 和外部探测器方法获得的年龄比较研究","authors":"R. Lugo-Zazueta, A. Gleadow, Barry P. Kohn, H. Sahu, Mauricio A. Bermúdez","doi":"10.2113/2023/lithosphere_2023_260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) in combination with developments in digital microscopy, image analysis, and computer software has allowed the implementation of an automated counting approach for the apatite fission-track (AFT) analysis. We refer to this approach as the “automated counting-LA-ICP-MS” (ACLA) method. Two major components comprise the ACLA method: (i) the digital counting of spontaneous tracks performed on high-resolution images captured from apatite grains and (ii) the measurement of 238U content in apatite by LA-ICP-MS. This study includes ACLA analyses from Fish Canyon Tuff (FCT) and Durango apatite standard crystals. Furthermore, a comparative age study between the ACLA and conventional external detector method (EDM) strategies was performed on a set of thirteen granitoid samples from northwestern Mexico and four granitic samples from the eastern Dharwar craton (EDC), India. ACLA analyses on FCT yielded an AFT age of 28.1 ± 0.6 (1σ) and 28.8 ± 1.1 (1σ) Ma for Durango apatite, whereas reported EDM ages are 27.5 ± 0.5 and 31.4 ± 0.5 Ma, respectively. Calculated AFT ages using the ACLA method from northwestern Mexico samples range from 11.1 ± 1.1 to 42.0 ± 3.6 Ma (EDM ages range from 10.0 ± 0.8 to 54.0 ± 3.0 Ma), whereas AFT ages from the EDC samples range from 147 ± 3.1 to 220.5 ± 12.5 Ma (EDM ages range from 120.9 ± 4.5 to 197.1 ± 19.4 Ma). Based on a statistical comparison with ages previously determined by the conventional EDM on the same samples and considering their 2σ uncertainties, these ages are in good agreement.","PeriodicalId":18147,"journal":{"name":"Lithosphere","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Apatite Fission-Track Dating: A Comparative Study of Ages Obtained by the Automated Counting LA-ICP-MS and External Detector Methodologies\",\"authors\":\"R. Lugo-Zazueta, A. Gleadow, Barry P. Kohn, H. Sahu, Mauricio A. Bermúdez\",\"doi\":\"10.2113/2023/lithosphere_2023_260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) in combination with developments in digital microscopy, image analysis, and computer software has allowed the implementation of an automated counting approach for the apatite fission-track (AFT) analysis. We refer to this approach as the “automated counting-LA-ICP-MS” (ACLA) method. Two major components comprise the ACLA method: (i) the digital counting of spontaneous tracks performed on high-resolution images captured from apatite grains and (ii) the measurement of 238U content in apatite by LA-ICP-MS. This study includes ACLA analyses from Fish Canyon Tuff (FCT) and Durango apatite standard crystals. Furthermore, a comparative age study between the ACLA and conventional external detector method (EDM) strategies was performed on a set of thirteen granitoid samples from northwestern Mexico and four granitic samples from the eastern Dharwar craton (EDC), India. ACLA analyses on FCT yielded an AFT age of 28.1 ± 0.6 (1σ) and 28.8 ± 1.1 (1σ) Ma for Durango apatite, whereas reported EDM ages are 27.5 ± 0.5 and 31.4 ± 0.5 Ma, respectively. Calculated AFT ages using the ACLA method from northwestern Mexico samples range from 11.1 ± 1.1 to 42.0 ± 3.6 Ma (EDM ages range from 10.0 ± 0.8 to 54.0 ± 3.0 Ma), whereas AFT ages from the EDC samples range from 147 ± 3.1 to 220.5 ± 12.5 Ma (EDM ages range from 120.9 ± 4.5 to 197.1 ± 19.4 Ma). Based on a statistical comparison with ages previously determined by the conventional EDM on the same samples and considering their 2σ uncertainties, these ages are in good agreement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lithosphere\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lithosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2113/2023/lithosphere_2023_260\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lithosphere","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2113/2023/lithosphere_2023_260","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

激光烧蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱法(LA-ICP-MS)与数字显微镜、图像分析和计算机软件的发展相结合,实现了磷灰石裂变轨迹(AFT)分析的自动计数方法。我们将这种方法称为 "自动计数-LA-ICP-MS"(ACLA)方法。ACLA 方法由两个主要部分组成:(i) 在从磷灰石晶粒捕获的高分辨率图像上对自发轨道进行数字计数;(ii) 通过 LA-ICP-MS 测量磷灰石中的 238U 含量。这项研究包括对鱼峡谷凝灰岩(FCT)和杜兰戈磷灰石标准晶体的 ACLA 分析。此外,还对来自墨西哥西北部的 13 个花岗岩样本和来自印度东部达尔沃克拉顿(EDC)的 4 个花岗岩样本进行了 ACLA 与传统外部探测器方法(EDM)之间的年龄对比研究。对 FCT 的 ACLA 分析得出杜兰戈磷灰石的 AFT 年龄为 28.1 ± 0.6 (1σ) Ma 和 28.8 ± 1.1 (1σ) Ma,而报告的 EDM 年龄分别为 27.5 ± 0.5 Ma 和 31.4 ± 0.5 Ma。墨西哥西北部样本采用 ACLA 方法计算的 AFT 年龄为 11.1 ± 1.1 至 42.0 ± 3.6 Ma(EDM 年龄为 10.0 ± 0.8 至 54.0 ± 3.0 Ma),而 EDC 样本的 AFT 年龄为 147 ± 3.1 至 220.5 ± 12.5 Ma(EDM 年龄为 120.9 ± 4.5 至 197.1 ± 19.4 Ma)。根据与之前在相同样品上通过传统 EDM 方法测定的年龄进行的统计比较,并考虑到其 2σ 不确定性,这些年龄具有很好的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Apatite Fission-Track Dating: A Comparative Study of Ages Obtained by the Automated Counting LA-ICP-MS and External Detector Methodologies
Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) in combination with developments in digital microscopy, image analysis, and computer software has allowed the implementation of an automated counting approach for the apatite fission-track (AFT) analysis. We refer to this approach as the “automated counting-LA-ICP-MS” (ACLA) method. Two major components comprise the ACLA method: (i) the digital counting of spontaneous tracks performed on high-resolution images captured from apatite grains and (ii) the measurement of 238U content in apatite by LA-ICP-MS. This study includes ACLA analyses from Fish Canyon Tuff (FCT) and Durango apatite standard crystals. Furthermore, a comparative age study between the ACLA and conventional external detector method (EDM) strategies was performed on a set of thirteen granitoid samples from northwestern Mexico and four granitic samples from the eastern Dharwar craton (EDC), India. ACLA analyses on FCT yielded an AFT age of 28.1 ± 0.6 (1σ) and 28.8 ± 1.1 (1σ) Ma for Durango apatite, whereas reported EDM ages are 27.5 ± 0.5 and 31.4 ± 0.5 Ma, respectively. Calculated AFT ages using the ACLA method from northwestern Mexico samples range from 11.1 ± 1.1 to 42.0 ± 3.6 Ma (EDM ages range from 10.0 ± 0.8 to 54.0 ± 3.0 Ma), whereas AFT ages from the EDC samples range from 147 ± 3.1 to 220.5 ± 12.5 Ma (EDM ages range from 120.9 ± 4.5 to 197.1 ± 19.4 Ma). Based on a statistical comparison with ages previously determined by the conventional EDM on the same samples and considering their 2σ uncertainties, these ages are in good agreement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lithosphere
Lithosphere GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-GEOLOGY
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
284
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The open access journal will have an expanded scope covering research in all areas of earth, planetary, and environmental sciences, providing a unique publishing choice for authors in the geoscience community.
期刊最新文献
A Novel Method for Improving the Robustness of Rock Acoustic Emission b Value Estimation through Data Volume Expansion Discovery of a Buried Active Fault to the South of the 1679 M8.0 Sanhe–Pinggu Earthquake in the North China Plain: Evidence from Seismic Reflection Exploration and Drilling Profile Apatite Fission-Track Dating: A Comparative Study of Ages Obtained by the Automated Counting LA-ICP-MS and External Detector Methodologies Integrated Simulation for Microseismic Fracture Networks with Automatic History Matching in Tight Oil Development: A Field Case from Block Y2 in Ordos Basin, China Insight into the Evolution of the Eastern Margin of the Wyoming Craton from Complex, Laterally Variable Shear Wave Splitting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1