关于聊天机器人在血管外科中的使用和认知的公开电子调查

IF 1.4 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE EJVES Vascular Forum Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.07.037
Fabien Lareyre , Mario D'Oria , Caroline Caradu , Vincent Jongkind , Gilles Di Lorenzo , Matthew R. Smeds , Bahaa Nasr , Juliette Raffort
{"title":"关于聊天机器人在血管外科中的使用和认知的公开电子调查","authors":"Fabien Lareyre ,&nbsp;Mario D'Oria ,&nbsp;Caroline Caradu ,&nbsp;Vincent Jongkind ,&nbsp;Gilles Di Lorenzo ,&nbsp;Matthew R. Smeds ,&nbsp;Bahaa Nasr ,&nbsp;Juliette Raffort","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.07.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Large language models and artificial intelligence (AI) based chatbots have brought new insights in healthcare, but they also raise major concerns. Their applications in vascular surgery have scarcely been investigated to date. This international survey aimed to evaluate the perceptions and feedback from vascular surgeons on the use of AI chatbots in vascular surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This international open e-survey comprised 50 items that covered participant characteristics, their perceptions on the use of AI chatbots in vascular surgery, and their user experience. The study was designed in accordance with the Checklist for reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys and was critically reviewed and approved by international members of the European Vascular Research Collaborative (EVRC) prior to distribution. Participation was open to self reported health professionals specialised (or specialising) in vascular surgery, including residents or fellows.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 342 individuals who visited the survey page, 318 (93%) agreed to participate; 262 (82.4%) finished the survey and were included in the analysis. Most were consultants or attending physicians (64.1%), most declared not having any training or education related to AI in healthcare (221; 84.4%), and 198 (75.6%) rated their knowledge about the abilities of AI chatbots between average to very poor. Interestingly, 95 participants (36.3%) found that AI chatbots were very useful or somewhat useful in clinical practice at this stage and 229 (87.4%) agreed that they should be systematically validated prior to being used. Eighty participants (30.5%) had specifically tested it for questions related to clinical practice and 59 (73.8%) of them experienced issues or limitations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This international survey provides an overview of perceptions of AI chatbots by vascular surgeons and highlights the need to improve knowledge and training of health professionals to better evaluate, define, and implement their use in vascular surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36502,"journal":{"name":"EJVES Vascular Forum","volume":"62 ","pages":"Pages 57-63"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X24001333/pdfft?md5=47ef6fe3b374c40f1260077c7fdd477f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666688X24001333-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open E-survey on the Use and Perception of Chatbots in Vascular Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Fabien Lareyre ,&nbsp;Mario D'Oria ,&nbsp;Caroline Caradu ,&nbsp;Vincent Jongkind ,&nbsp;Gilles Di Lorenzo ,&nbsp;Matthew R. Smeds ,&nbsp;Bahaa Nasr ,&nbsp;Juliette Raffort\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.07.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Large language models and artificial intelligence (AI) based chatbots have brought new insights in healthcare, but they also raise major concerns. Their applications in vascular surgery have scarcely been investigated to date. This international survey aimed to evaluate the perceptions and feedback from vascular surgeons on the use of AI chatbots in vascular surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This international open e-survey comprised 50 items that covered participant characteristics, their perceptions on the use of AI chatbots in vascular surgery, and their user experience. The study was designed in accordance with the Checklist for reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys and was critically reviewed and approved by international members of the European Vascular Research Collaborative (EVRC) prior to distribution. Participation was open to self reported health professionals specialised (or specialising) in vascular surgery, including residents or fellows.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 342 individuals who visited the survey page, 318 (93%) agreed to participate; 262 (82.4%) finished the survey and were included in the analysis. Most were consultants or attending physicians (64.1%), most declared not having any training or education related to AI in healthcare (221; 84.4%), and 198 (75.6%) rated their knowledge about the abilities of AI chatbots between average to very poor. Interestingly, 95 participants (36.3%) found that AI chatbots were very useful or somewhat useful in clinical practice at this stage and 229 (87.4%) agreed that they should be systematically validated prior to being used. Eighty participants (30.5%) had specifically tested it for questions related to clinical practice and 59 (73.8%) of them experienced issues or limitations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This international survey provides an overview of perceptions of AI chatbots by vascular surgeons and highlights the need to improve knowledge and training of health professionals to better evaluate, define, and implement their use in vascular surgery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJVES Vascular Forum\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 57-63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X24001333/pdfft?md5=47ef6fe3b374c40f1260077c7fdd477f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666688X24001333-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJVES Vascular Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X24001333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJVES Vascular Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X24001333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标基于大型语言模型和人工智能(AI)的聊天机器人为医疗保健领域带来了新的见解,但也引发了重大问题。迄今为止,对其在血管外科中的应用还很少进行调查。这项国际调查旨在评估血管外科医生对人工智能聊天机器人在血管外科中应用的看法和反馈。方法这项国际开放式电子调查包括 50 个项目,涵盖参与者的特征、他们对人工智能聊天机器人在血管外科中应用的看法以及他们的用户体验。本研究根据互联网电子调查结果报告核对表进行设计,并在发布前经过欧洲血管研究合作组织 (EVRC) 国际成员的严格审核和批准。在访问调查页面的 342 人中,318 人(93%)同意参与调查;262 人(82.4%)完成了调查并被纳入分析。大多数人是顾问或主治医师(64.1%),大多数人声称没有接受过任何与医疗保健领域人工智能相关的培训或教育(221 人,84.4%),198 人(75.6%)将自己对人工智能聊天机器人能力的了解评为一般到很差。有趣的是,95 位参与者(36.3%)认为人工智能聊天机器人在现阶段的临床实践中非常有用或有点用,229 位参与者(87.4%)同意在使用前应对其进行系统验证。80名参与者(30.5%)专门针对与临床实践相关的问题进行了测试,其中59名参与者(73.8%)遇到了问题或限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open E-survey on the Use and Perception of Chatbots in Vascular Surgery

Objective

Large language models and artificial intelligence (AI) based chatbots have brought new insights in healthcare, but they also raise major concerns. Their applications in vascular surgery have scarcely been investigated to date. This international survey aimed to evaluate the perceptions and feedback from vascular surgeons on the use of AI chatbots in vascular surgery.

Methods

This international open e-survey comprised 50 items that covered participant characteristics, their perceptions on the use of AI chatbots in vascular surgery, and their user experience. The study was designed in accordance with the Checklist for reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys and was critically reviewed and approved by international members of the European Vascular Research Collaborative (EVRC) prior to distribution. Participation was open to self reported health professionals specialised (or specialising) in vascular surgery, including residents or fellows.

Results

Of the 342 individuals who visited the survey page, 318 (93%) agreed to participate; 262 (82.4%) finished the survey and were included in the analysis. Most were consultants or attending physicians (64.1%), most declared not having any training or education related to AI in healthcare (221; 84.4%), and 198 (75.6%) rated their knowledge about the abilities of AI chatbots between average to very poor. Interestingly, 95 participants (36.3%) found that AI chatbots were very useful or somewhat useful in clinical practice at this stage and 229 (87.4%) agreed that they should be systematically validated prior to being used. Eighty participants (30.5%) had specifically tested it for questions related to clinical practice and 59 (73.8%) of them experienced issues or limitations.

Conclusion

This international survey provides an overview of perceptions of AI chatbots by vascular surgeons and highlights the need to improve knowledge and training of health professionals to better evaluate, define, and implement their use in vascular surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EJVES Vascular Forum
EJVES Vascular Forum Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
102 days
期刊最新文献
Primary Intra-operative Embolisation During Urgent Parallel Graft Endovascular Repair in Paravisceral Symptomatic Aortic Pseudoaneurysm Association Between the Effectiveness and Magnitude of Foot Microcirculation Assessed by Radionuclide Angiography and One Year Limb Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia Anastomotic Pseudoaneurysm in an Abandoned Brachiocephalic Arteriovenous Fistula Editorial Board Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1