Robin Eelsing , Robert Hemke , Kim van Oudenaarde , Jens A. Halm , Tim Schepers
{"title":"钙骨骨折的放射学评估;使用计算机断层扫描测量伯勒角的新方法","authors":"Robin Eelsing , Robert Hemke , Kim van Oudenaarde , Jens A. Halm , Tim Schepers","doi":"10.1016/j.foot.2024.102119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Böhler’s angle (BA) is used for identifying calcaneal fractures and evaluating calcaneal collapse after reconstruction. This study investigates whether it is possible to determine BA with the help of Computed Tomography (CT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective study was performed to compare the BA on conventional radiograph (Gold Standard, GS) versus measurements on CT. Two groups were studied: one group consisted of 11 subjects with a diagnosed calcaneal fracture, the other group of 11 subjects with a fracture of the lower extremities but no calcaneal fracture. A lateral Böhler angle (LBA), central Böhler angle (CBA) and a medial Böhler angle (MBA) were defined on CT. Furthermore, BA was reconstructed out of a 3D reconstruction (3DBA).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>CBA approached the GS with a mean difference of 3.78° (95 %CI: 2.82–4.75) with no significant difference in variance (p = 1.000). 3DBA approached the GS with a mean difference of 2.14° (95 %CI: 1.57–2.70) with a significant difference in variance (p = 0.014). No relevant correlations were found between LBA/MBA and the GS. ICC between raters was considered as good or excellent for both CBA and 3DBA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Giving the high accuracy and better capability to visualize the anatomy in the case of severe injury, measuring BA on 3D reconstruction is a suggested alternative to the traditional technique.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>III, Retrospective</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12349,"journal":{"name":"Foot","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095825922400052X/pdfft?md5=cb4acfc0fdf2a6319d145010dee04877&pid=1-s2.0-S095825922400052X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiographic assessment of calcaneal fractures; A new approach to Böhler’s angle using computed tomography\",\"authors\":\"Robin Eelsing , Robert Hemke , Kim van Oudenaarde , Jens A. Halm , Tim Schepers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foot.2024.102119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Böhler’s angle (BA) is used for identifying calcaneal fractures and evaluating calcaneal collapse after reconstruction. This study investigates whether it is possible to determine BA with the help of Computed Tomography (CT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective study was performed to compare the BA on conventional radiograph (Gold Standard, GS) versus measurements on CT. Two groups were studied: one group consisted of 11 subjects with a diagnosed calcaneal fracture, the other group of 11 subjects with a fracture of the lower extremities but no calcaneal fracture. A lateral Böhler angle (LBA), central Böhler angle (CBA) and a medial Böhler angle (MBA) were defined on CT. Furthermore, BA was reconstructed out of a 3D reconstruction (3DBA).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>CBA approached the GS with a mean difference of 3.78° (95 %CI: 2.82–4.75) with no significant difference in variance (p = 1.000). 3DBA approached the GS with a mean difference of 2.14° (95 %CI: 1.57–2.70) with a significant difference in variance (p = 0.014). No relevant correlations were found between LBA/MBA and the GS. ICC between raters was considered as good or excellent for both CBA and 3DBA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Giving the high accuracy and better capability to visualize the anatomy in the case of severe injury, measuring BA on 3D reconstruction is a suggested alternative to the traditional technique.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>III, Retrospective</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095825922400052X/pdfft?md5=cb4acfc0fdf2a6319d145010dee04877&pid=1-s2.0-S095825922400052X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095825922400052X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095825922400052X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景伯勒氏角(BA)用于识别小腿骨骨折和评估重建后的小腿骨塌陷。本研究探讨了是否有可能借助计算机断层扫描(CT)来确定BA。方法 本研究进行了一项回顾性研究,以比较传统 X 光片(黄金标准,GS)上的 BA 与 CT 上的测量值。研究分为两组:一组包括 11 名确诊为小关节骨折的受试者,另一组包括 11 名下肢骨折但无小关节骨折的受试者。在 CT 上确定了外侧伯勒角(LBA)、中央伯勒角(CBA)和内侧伯勒角(MBA)。结果CBA接近GS的平均差为3.78°(95 %CI:2.82-4.75),方差无显著差异(p = 1.000)。3DBA 接近 GS 的平均差为 2.14°(95 %CI:1.57-2.70),差异显著(p = 0.014)。没有发现 LBA/MBA 与 GS 之间存在相关性。结论在严重损伤的情况下,通过三维重建测量 BA 具有较高的准确性和更好的解剖可视化能力,是一种替代传统技术的建议。
Radiographic assessment of calcaneal fractures; A new approach to Böhler’s angle using computed tomography
Background
Böhler’s angle (BA) is used for identifying calcaneal fractures and evaluating calcaneal collapse after reconstruction. This study investigates whether it is possible to determine BA with the help of Computed Tomography (CT).
Methods
A retrospective study was performed to compare the BA on conventional radiograph (Gold Standard, GS) versus measurements on CT. Two groups were studied: one group consisted of 11 subjects with a diagnosed calcaneal fracture, the other group of 11 subjects with a fracture of the lower extremities but no calcaneal fracture. A lateral Böhler angle (LBA), central Böhler angle (CBA) and a medial Böhler angle (MBA) were defined on CT. Furthermore, BA was reconstructed out of a 3D reconstruction (3DBA).
Results
CBA approached the GS with a mean difference of 3.78° (95 %CI: 2.82–4.75) with no significant difference in variance (p = 1.000). 3DBA approached the GS with a mean difference of 2.14° (95 %CI: 1.57–2.70) with a significant difference in variance (p = 0.014). No relevant correlations were found between LBA/MBA and the GS. ICC between raters was considered as good or excellent for both CBA and 3DBA.
Conclusion
Giving the high accuracy and better capability to visualize the anatomy in the case of severe injury, measuring BA on 3D reconstruction is a suggested alternative to the traditional technique.
期刊介绍:
The Foot is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of scientific approaches and medical and surgical treatment of the foot. The Foot aims to provide a multidisciplinary platform for all specialties involved in treating disorders of the foot. At present it is the only journal which provides this inter-disciplinary opportunity. Primary research papers cover a wide range of disorders of the foot and their treatment, including diabetes, vascular disease, neurological, dermatological and infectious conditions, sports injuries, biomechanics, bioengineering, orthoses and prostheses.