诊断鳞状细胞癌的非侵入性技术系统回顾与荟萃分析

Carina Nogueira Garcia , Christoph Wies , Katja Hauser , Titus J. Brinker
{"title":"诊断鳞状细胞癌的非侵入性技术系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Carina Nogueira Garcia ,&nbsp;Christoph Wies ,&nbsp;Katja Hauser ,&nbsp;Titus J. Brinker","doi":"10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Early cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) diagnosis is essential to initiate adequate targeted treatment. Noninvasive diagnostic technologies could overcome the need of multiple biopsies and reduce tumor recurrence. To assess performance of noninvasive technologies for cSCC diagnostics, 947 relevant records were identified through a systematic literature search. Among the 15 selected studies within this systematic review, 7 were included in the meta-analysis, comprising of 1144 patients, 224 cSCC lesions, and 1729 clinical diagnoses. Overall, the sensitivity values are 92% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 86.6–96.4%) for high-frequency ultrasound, 75% (95% CI = 65.7–86.2%) for optical coherence tomography, and 63% (95% CI = 51.3–69.1%) for reflectance confocal microscopy. The overall specificity values are 88% (95% CI = 82.7–92.5%), 95% (95% CI = 92.7–97.3%), and 96% (95% CI = 94.8–97.4%), respectively. Physician’s expertise is key for high diagnostic performance of investigated devices. This can be justified by the provision of additional tissue information, which requires physician interpretation, despite insufficient standardized diagnostic criteria. Furthermore, few deep learning studies were identified. Thus, integration of deep learning into the investigated devices is a potential investigating field in cSCC diagnosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73548,"journal":{"name":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","volume":"4 6","pages":"Article 100303"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266702672400050X/pdfft?md5=e2d200dbc371629064d1b3b62bc3f822&pid=1-s2.0-S266702672400050X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Noninvasive Technologies for the Diagnosis of Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Carina Nogueira Garcia ,&nbsp;Christoph Wies ,&nbsp;Katja Hauser ,&nbsp;Titus J. Brinker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Early cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) diagnosis is essential to initiate adequate targeted treatment. Noninvasive diagnostic technologies could overcome the need of multiple biopsies and reduce tumor recurrence. To assess performance of noninvasive technologies for cSCC diagnostics, 947 relevant records were identified through a systematic literature search. Among the 15 selected studies within this systematic review, 7 were included in the meta-analysis, comprising of 1144 patients, 224 cSCC lesions, and 1729 clinical diagnoses. Overall, the sensitivity values are 92% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 86.6–96.4%) for high-frequency ultrasound, 75% (95% CI = 65.7–86.2%) for optical coherence tomography, and 63% (95% CI = 51.3–69.1%) for reflectance confocal microscopy. The overall specificity values are 88% (95% CI = 82.7–92.5%), 95% (95% CI = 92.7–97.3%), and 96% (95% CI = 94.8–97.4%), respectively. Physician’s expertise is key for high diagnostic performance of investigated devices. This can be justified by the provision of additional tissue information, which requires physician interpretation, despite insufficient standardized diagnostic criteria. Furthermore, few deep learning studies were identified. Thus, integration of deep learning into the investigated devices is a potential investigating field in cSCC diagnosis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health\",\"volume\":\"4 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 100303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266702672400050X/pdfft?md5=e2d200dbc371629064d1b3b62bc3f822&pid=1-s2.0-S266702672400050X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266702672400050X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266702672400050X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

皮肤鳞状细胞癌(cSCC)的早期诊断对于启动适当的靶向治疗至关重要。无创诊断技术可以克服多次活检的需要并减少肿瘤复发。为了评估用于 cSCC 诊断的无创技术的性能,我们通过系统性文献检索找到了 947 条相关记录。在本次系统性综述所选的 15 项研究中,有 7 项纳入了荟萃分析,包括 1144 名患者、224 个 cSCC 病灶和 1729 项临床诊断。总体而言,高频超声的灵敏度为 92%(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 86.6-96.4%),光学相干断层扫描的灵敏度为 75%(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 65.7-86.2%),反射共聚焦显微镜的灵敏度为 63%(95% 置信区间 [CI] = 51.3-69.1%)。总体特异性值分别为 88%(95% CI = 82.7-92.5%)、95%(95% CI = 92.7-97.3%)和 96%(95% CI = 94.8-97.4%)。医生的专业知识是调查设备实现高诊断性能的关键。尽管没有足够的标准化诊断标准,但由于提供了额外的组织信息,需要医生的解释,这一点是合理的。此外,深度学习研究很少。因此,在 cSCC 诊断中,将深度学习整合到调查设备中是一个潜在的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Noninvasive Technologies for the Diagnosis of Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Early cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) diagnosis is essential to initiate adequate targeted treatment. Noninvasive diagnostic technologies could overcome the need of multiple biopsies and reduce tumor recurrence. To assess performance of noninvasive technologies for cSCC diagnostics, 947 relevant records were identified through a systematic literature search. Among the 15 selected studies within this systematic review, 7 were included in the meta-analysis, comprising of 1144 patients, 224 cSCC lesions, and 1729 clinical diagnoses. Overall, the sensitivity values are 92% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 86.6–96.4%) for high-frequency ultrasound, 75% (95% CI = 65.7–86.2%) for optical coherence tomography, and 63% (95% CI = 51.3–69.1%) for reflectance confocal microscopy. The overall specificity values are 88% (95% CI = 82.7–92.5%), 95% (95% CI = 92.7–97.3%), and 96% (95% CI = 94.8–97.4%), respectively. Physician’s expertise is key for high diagnostic performance of investigated devices. This can be justified by the provision of additional tissue information, which requires physician interpretation, despite insufficient standardized diagnostic criteria. Furthermore, few deep learning studies were identified. Thus, integration of deep learning into the investigated devices is a potential investigating field in cSCC diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cover 1 Corrigendum to ‘Proteomic Profiling of CCCA Reveals Role of Humoral Immune Response Pathway and Metabolic Dysregulation’ JID Innovations, Volume 4, Issue 3, May 2024, 100263 Identification of Associations with Dermatologic Diseases through a Focused GWAS of the UK Biobank From Plant to Patient: A Historical Perspective and Review of Selected Medicinal Plants in Dermatology Spatial Transcriptomics in Inflammatory Skin Diseases Using GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiling: A Practical Guide for Applications in Dermatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1