评估插管枕对儿童喉镜检查等级的影响:随机对照试验

Sonya Susan George, Arun K. Kurian, Sajan Philip George, Lakshmanan Jeyasheelan, B. Yadav
{"title":"评估插管枕对儿童喉镜检查等级的影响:随机对照试验","authors":"Sonya Susan George, Arun K. Kurian, Sajan Philip George, Lakshmanan Jeyasheelan, B. Yadav","doi":"10.4103/jpcc.jpcc_16_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Laryngoscopy and intubation remain critical in pediatric patients as compared to adult patients due to different anatomy. This study was conducted to compare the Cormack and Lehane grade (CL) of laryngoscopy, percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score, and the efficacy of backward upward rightward pressure (BURP) maneuver to improve laryngoscopy grade with or without the use of intubation pillow.\n \n \n \n A randomized controlled trial was done from January 2020 to July 2020 on 68 children with 34 children in Group 1 (with intubation pillow) and 34 patients in Group 2 (without intubation pillow). Children between 5 and 12 years of age (the American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II) planned for surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal tube were included in this study. Pillow of 4 cm size was used in 5–9 years and 6 cm pillow in 9–12 years of age group. Macintosh laryngoscope was used for intubation. CL grading and POGO score were assessed. BURP maneuver was given in cases of difficult laryngoscopy of CL grade above 2 and its effect on improvement in CL grading was measured.\n \n \n \n Group 1 children had significantly more CL grade I (83.3% vs. 16.7%); significantly lesser CL Grade IIb (23.1% vs. 76.9%, P = 0.001); and significantly more POGO score (97% vs. 86%, P < 0.05) than Group 2. The use of BURP maneuver significantly improved the laryngoscopy view in both the groups.\n \n \n \n The use of intubation pillow in children between 5 and 12 years of age facilitated better laryngoscopy view and POGO score.\n","PeriodicalId":34184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the impact of intubation pillow on laryngoscopy grade in children: A Randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Sonya Susan George, Arun K. Kurian, Sajan Philip George, Lakshmanan Jeyasheelan, B. Yadav\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpcc.jpcc_16_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Laryngoscopy and intubation remain critical in pediatric patients as compared to adult patients due to different anatomy. This study was conducted to compare the Cormack and Lehane grade (CL) of laryngoscopy, percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score, and the efficacy of backward upward rightward pressure (BURP) maneuver to improve laryngoscopy grade with or without the use of intubation pillow.\\n \\n \\n \\n A randomized controlled trial was done from January 2020 to July 2020 on 68 children with 34 children in Group 1 (with intubation pillow) and 34 patients in Group 2 (without intubation pillow). Children between 5 and 12 years of age (the American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II) planned for surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal tube were included in this study. Pillow of 4 cm size was used in 5–9 years and 6 cm pillow in 9–12 years of age group. Macintosh laryngoscope was used for intubation. CL grading and POGO score were assessed. BURP maneuver was given in cases of difficult laryngoscopy of CL grade above 2 and its effect on improvement in CL grading was measured.\\n \\n \\n \\n Group 1 children had significantly more CL grade I (83.3% vs. 16.7%); significantly lesser CL Grade IIb (23.1% vs. 76.9%, P = 0.001); and significantly more POGO score (97% vs. 86%, P < 0.05) than Group 2. The use of BURP maneuver significantly improved the laryngoscopy view in both the groups.\\n \\n \\n \\n The use of intubation pillow in children between 5 and 12 years of age facilitated better laryngoscopy view and POGO score.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":34184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Critical Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpcc.jpcc_16_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpcc.jpcc_16_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于解剖结构不同,与成人患者相比,儿童患者的喉镜检查和插管仍然至关重要。本研究旨在比较喉镜检查的 Cormack 和 Lehane 等级(CL)、声门开放百分比(POGO)评分,以及在使用或不使用插管枕的情况下,采用向后上方向右加压(BURP)手法提高喉镜检查等级的效果。 2020 年 1 月至 2020 年 7 月期间,对 68 名儿童进行了随机对照试验,其中第一组(使用插管枕)34 名儿童,第二组(不使用插管枕)34 名患者。研究对象包括计划在气管插管全身麻醉下进行手术的 5 至 12 岁儿童(美国麻醉医师协会 I 级和 II 级)。5-9 岁儿童使用 4 厘米大小的枕头,9-12 岁儿童使用 6 厘米大小的枕头。插管时使用 Macintosh 喉镜。对 CL 分级和 POGO 评分进行评估。对 CL 分级超过 2 的困难喉镜病例采用 BURP 操作,并测量其对改善 CL 分级的效果。 与第二组相比,第一组患儿的CL分级为I级的明显较多(83.3%对16.7%);CL分级为IIb级的明显较少(23.1%对76.9%,P = 0.001);POGO评分明显较高(97%对86%,P < 0.05)。 5 至 12 岁儿童使用插管枕有助于获得更好的喉镜视野和 POGO 评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the impact of intubation pillow on laryngoscopy grade in children: A Randomized controlled trial
Laryngoscopy and intubation remain critical in pediatric patients as compared to adult patients due to different anatomy. This study was conducted to compare the Cormack and Lehane grade (CL) of laryngoscopy, percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score, and the efficacy of backward upward rightward pressure (BURP) maneuver to improve laryngoscopy grade with or without the use of intubation pillow. A randomized controlled trial was done from January 2020 to July 2020 on 68 children with 34 children in Group 1 (with intubation pillow) and 34 patients in Group 2 (without intubation pillow). Children between 5 and 12 years of age (the American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II) planned for surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal tube were included in this study. Pillow of 4 cm size was used in 5–9 years and 6 cm pillow in 9–12 years of age group. Macintosh laryngoscope was used for intubation. CL grading and POGO score were assessed. BURP maneuver was given in cases of difficult laryngoscopy of CL grade above 2 and its effect on improvement in CL grading was measured. Group 1 children had significantly more CL grade I (83.3% vs. 16.7%); significantly lesser CL Grade IIb (23.1% vs. 76.9%, P = 0.001); and significantly more POGO score (97% vs. 86%, P < 0.05) than Group 2. The use of BURP maneuver significantly improved the laryngoscopy view in both the groups. The use of intubation pillow in children between 5 and 12 years of age facilitated better laryngoscopy view and POGO score.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Left main bronchus compression by massive pericardial effusion: A rare cause of respiratory distress in an infant: A case report Challenges in estimating the severity of kidney dysfunction in critically ill children Neuroparalytic snakebite resulting in cerebral salt wasting and refractory hyponatremia: A case report Takotsubo cardiomyopathy in a 7-month-old infant with familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: A case report Evaluating the impact of intubation pillow on laryngoscopy grade in children: A Randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1