老年胶质母细胞瘤的手术切除:利用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库分析生存结果

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108469
{"title":"老年胶质母细胞瘤的手术切除:利用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库分析生存结果","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) often undergo surgery to prolong survival. However, the use of surgery, and more specifically achieving gross total resection (GTR), in patients <u>&gt;</u>80 years old has yet to be fully assessed. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we aim to assess the efficacy of surgical resection, radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) on overall survival (OS) in very elderly GBM patients compared to elderly counterparts (age 65–79 years).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The SEER database was queried for all patients <u>&gt;</u>65 years old with GBM (2000–2020). Patients not undergoing surgery or biopsy were excluded. Patients were stratified by age, and demographic relationships were assessed with chi-squared testing for categorical variables. Bivariable models were created using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. All significant variables from bivariable analysis were included on multivariable Cox survival regression models to determine independent associations between clinical variables and OS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 27,090 operative GBM patients were identified; 1868 patients (15.92 %) were very elderly and 10,092 patients (84.38 %) were elderly. Very elderly patients were less likely to undergo GTR (28 % vs 35 %, p&lt;0.001), RT (59 % vs 78 %, p&lt;0.001) and CT (40 % vs 66 %, p&lt;0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, very elderly patients who achieved GTR (HR=.696, p&lt;0.001), received RT (HR=0.583, p&lt;0.001) and underwent CT (HR=0.4197, p&lt;0.001) had significantly improved OS compared to very elderly patients that did not undergo these treatment options.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Currently, very elderly GBM patients undergo lower rates of aggressive surgery, RT and CT. However, very elderly patients that undergo surgery, RT and CT may have a survival advantage. These treatments should be considered as potential options for this patient population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical resection of glioblastoma in the very elderly: An analysis of survival outcomes using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) often undergo surgery to prolong survival. However, the use of surgery, and more specifically achieving gross total resection (GTR), in patients <u>&gt;</u>80 years old has yet to be fully assessed. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we aim to assess the efficacy of surgical resection, radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) on overall survival (OS) in very elderly GBM patients compared to elderly counterparts (age 65–79 years).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The SEER database was queried for all patients <u>&gt;</u>65 years old with GBM (2000–2020). Patients not undergoing surgery or biopsy were excluded. Patients were stratified by age, and demographic relationships were assessed with chi-squared testing for categorical variables. Bivariable models were created using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. All significant variables from bivariable analysis were included on multivariable Cox survival regression models to determine independent associations between clinical variables and OS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 27,090 operative GBM patients were identified; 1868 patients (15.92 %) were very elderly and 10,092 patients (84.38 %) were elderly. Very elderly patients were less likely to undergo GTR (28 % vs 35 %, p&lt;0.001), RT (59 % vs 78 %, p&lt;0.001) and CT (40 % vs 66 %, p&lt;0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, very elderly patients who achieved GTR (HR=.696, p&lt;0.001), received RT (HR=0.583, p&lt;0.001) and underwent CT (HR=0.4197, p&lt;0.001) had significantly improved OS compared to very elderly patients that did not undergo these treatment options.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Currently, very elderly GBM patients undergo lower rates of aggressive surgery, RT and CT. However, very elderly patients that undergo surgery, RT and CT may have a survival advantage. These treatments should be considered as potential options for this patient population.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846724003561\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846724003561","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者通常通过手术来延长生存期。然而,手术的使用,更具体地说是实现大体全切除术(GTR),在 80 岁的患者中还没有得到充分评估。利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库,我们旨在评估手术切除、放疗(RT)和化疗(CT)与老年患者(65-79 岁)相比,对高龄 GBM 患者总生存期(OS)的疗效。未接受手术或活检的患者被排除在外。根据年龄对患者进行分层,并通过对分类变量进行卡方检验来评估人口统计学关系。使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存估计值建立二变量模型。双变量分析中的所有重要变量都被纳入多变量 Cox 生存回归模型,以确定临床变量与 OS 之间的独立关联。结果共确定了 27090 例 GBM 手术患者,其中 1868 例患者(15.92%)为高龄患者,10092 例患者(84.38%)为老年患者。高龄患者接受 GTR(28 % vs 35 %,p<0.001)、RT(59 % vs 78 %,p<0.001)和 CT(40 % vs 66 %,p<0.001)的可能性较低。在多变量 Cox 回归分析中,与未接受这些治疗方案的老年患者相比,接受 GTR(HR=.696,p<0.001)、RT(HR=0.583,p<0.001)和 CT(HR=0.4197,p<0.001)的老年患者的 OS 显著改善。然而,接受手术、RT 和 CT 治疗的高龄患者可能具有生存优势。这些治疗方法应被视为这类患者的潜在选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Surgical resection of glioblastoma in the very elderly: An analysis of survival outcomes using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database

Objective

Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) often undergo surgery to prolong survival. However, the use of surgery, and more specifically achieving gross total resection (GTR), in patients >80 years old has yet to be fully assessed. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we aim to assess the efficacy of surgical resection, radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) on overall survival (OS) in very elderly GBM patients compared to elderly counterparts (age 65–79 years).

Methods

The SEER database was queried for all patients >65 years old with GBM (2000–2020). Patients not undergoing surgery or biopsy were excluded. Patients were stratified by age, and demographic relationships were assessed with chi-squared testing for categorical variables. Bivariable models were created using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. All significant variables from bivariable analysis were included on multivariable Cox survival regression models to determine independent associations between clinical variables and OS.

Results

A total of 27,090 operative GBM patients were identified; 1868 patients (15.92 %) were very elderly and 10,092 patients (84.38 %) were elderly. Very elderly patients were less likely to undergo GTR (28 % vs 35 %, p<0.001), RT (59 % vs 78 %, p<0.001) and CT (40 % vs 66 %, p<0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, very elderly patients who achieved GTR (HR=.696, p<0.001), received RT (HR=0.583, p<0.001) and underwent CT (HR=0.4197, p<0.001) had significantly improved OS compared to very elderly patients that did not undergo these treatment options.

Conclusion

Currently, very elderly GBM patients undergo lower rates of aggressive surgery, RT and CT. However, very elderly patients that undergo surgery, RT and CT may have a survival advantage. These treatments should be considered as potential options for this patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of pain phenotypes and co-morbidities of chronic pain in Parkinson’s Disease Letter to the editor: “Endovascular treatment of mycotic aneurysms: An update meta-analysis” Changes in gut microbiome can be associated with abrupt seizure exacerbation in epilepsy patients Analysis of recurrence factors after balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia and the relationship between pear-shaped balloon and guidewire path Complications during and after ICU stay are associated with increased mortality after status epilepticus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1