设计并系统评估用于连作作物的树冠下机器人喷洒系统

IF 6.3 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING Smart agricultural technology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.atech.2024.100510
{"title":"设计并系统评估用于连作作物的树冠下机器人喷洒系统","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.atech.2024.100510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite having made much improvement in sensing, automation, and control, the current broadcast spraying system has several drawbacks, such as uneven coverage, excessive chemical use, and deviation from recommended dosage. Typically, farmers use large self-propelled sprayers to spray the entire field without knowledge of spatial pest severity, potentially resulting in an unintentional application. However, application errors and the extent of chemical use can be optimized by utilizing an intelligent site-specific decision-based sprayer to control pests more efficiently. Hence, the initial project goal was to design a robotic liquid application system for row crops (e.g., sorghum and corn) and validate sprayer system performance. The critical design considerations for the spray application system were modularity; the ability to be mounted on an autonomous platform to go within 76.2-cm spaced crops; spray on either side of the crop row using spray booms; onboard hardware and software for control and data acquisition; and record as-applied data. A system with desired design requirements was built and individual sub-systems were tested under simulated lab scenarios to quantify the response time and accuracy of the spray system. The results showed that the sprayer could maintain an average system pressure within ±5% of the target under different duty cycles for each of the six nozzles. At 40% duty cycle, the nozzle pressure settling time at an error margin of ±5% from the mean was 13 ms, 20 ms, and 19 ms, for one, three, and six nozzles, respectively. Also, no substantial pressure difference was observed between nozzles installed at different heights in two different booms. Therefore, this application system could be a viable solution for autonomous platforms to site-specifically apply pesticides only on critically infested plants, has the potential to decrease the overall input costs on chemicals and reduce the negative environmental impacts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74813,"journal":{"name":"Smart agricultural technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524001151/pdfft?md5=eff1f46e0367a7d26719e68428d9557c&pid=1-s2.0-S2772375524001151-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and systematic evaluation of an under-canopy robotic spray system for row crops\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.atech.2024.100510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite having made much improvement in sensing, automation, and control, the current broadcast spraying system has several drawbacks, such as uneven coverage, excessive chemical use, and deviation from recommended dosage. Typically, farmers use large self-propelled sprayers to spray the entire field without knowledge of spatial pest severity, potentially resulting in an unintentional application. However, application errors and the extent of chemical use can be optimized by utilizing an intelligent site-specific decision-based sprayer to control pests more efficiently. Hence, the initial project goal was to design a robotic liquid application system for row crops (e.g., sorghum and corn) and validate sprayer system performance. The critical design considerations for the spray application system were modularity; the ability to be mounted on an autonomous platform to go within 76.2-cm spaced crops; spray on either side of the crop row using spray booms; onboard hardware and software for control and data acquisition; and record as-applied data. A system with desired design requirements was built and individual sub-systems were tested under simulated lab scenarios to quantify the response time and accuracy of the spray system. The results showed that the sprayer could maintain an average system pressure within ±5% of the target under different duty cycles for each of the six nozzles. At 40% duty cycle, the nozzle pressure settling time at an error margin of ±5% from the mean was 13 ms, 20 ms, and 19 ms, for one, three, and six nozzles, respectively. Also, no substantial pressure difference was observed between nozzles installed at different heights in two different booms. Therefore, this application system could be a viable solution for autonomous platforms to site-specifically apply pesticides only on critically infested plants, has the potential to decrease the overall input costs on chemicals and reduce the negative environmental impacts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Smart agricultural technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524001151/pdfft?md5=eff1f46e0367a7d26719e68428d9557c&pid=1-s2.0-S2772375524001151-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Smart agricultural technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524001151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart agricultural technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772375524001151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在传感、自动化和控制方面有了很大改进,但目前的广播式喷洒系统仍存在一些缺点,如覆盖范围不均匀、化学品使用过量和偏离推荐剂量等。通常情况下,农民在不了解空间害虫严重程度的情况下,使用大型自走式喷洒器喷洒整块田地,可能会造成无意喷洒。然而,通过使用基于特定地点决策的智能喷雾器,可以优化施药错误和化学品使用范围,从而更有效地控制害虫。因此,项目的最初目标是设计一种用于行作物(如高粱和玉米)的机器人液体喷洒系统,并验证喷雾器系统的性能。喷洒系统的关键设计考虑因素包括:模块化;能够安装在自主平台上,进入间距为 76.2 厘米的作物;使用喷洒臂在作物行的两侧喷洒;用于控制和数据采集的机载硬件和软件;以及记录喷洒数据。我们建立了一个符合预期设计要求的系统,并在模拟实验室场景下对各个子系统进行了测试,以量化喷雾系统的响应时间和准确性。结果表明,在不同的工作周期下,喷雾器的六个喷嘴都能将系统平均压力保持在目标值的 ±5% 以内。在 40% 的占空比下,一个喷嘴、三个喷嘴和六个喷嘴在误差为平均值 ±5% 时的压力稳定时间分别为 13 毫秒、20 毫秒和 19 毫秒。此外,安装在两个不同围油栏不同高度的喷嘴之间也没有观察到明显的压力差异。因此,该施药系统可作为自主平台的一个可行解决方案,只针对严重受侵扰的植物施用杀虫剂,有可能降低化学品的总体投入成本,并减少对环境的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design and systematic evaluation of an under-canopy robotic spray system for row crops

Despite having made much improvement in sensing, automation, and control, the current broadcast spraying system has several drawbacks, such as uneven coverage, excessive chemical use, and deviation from recommended dosage. Typically, farmers use large self-propelled sprayers to spray the entire field without knowledge of spatial pest severity, potentially resulting in an unintentional application. However, application errors and the extent of chemical use can be optimized by utilizing an intelligent site-specific decision-based sprayer to control pests more efficiently. Hence, the initial project goal was to design a robotic liquid application system for row crops (e.g., sorghum and corn) and validate sprayer system performance. The critical design considerations for the spray application system were modularity; the ability to be mounted on an autonomous platform to go within 76.2-cm spaced crops; spray on either side of the crop row using spray booms; onboard hardware and software for control and data acquisition; and record as-applied data. A system with desired design requirements was built and individual sub-systems were tested under simulated lab scenarios to quantify the response time and accuracy of the spray system. The results showed that the sprayer could maintain an average system pressure within ±5% of the target under different duty cycles for each of the six nozzles. At 40% duty cycle, the nozzle pressure settling time at an error margin of ±5% from the mean was 13 ms, 20 ms, and 19 ms, for one, three, and six nozzles, respectively. Also, no substantial pressure difference was observed between nozzles installed at different heights in two different booms. Therefore, this application system could be a viable solution for autonomous platforms to site-specifically apply pesticides only on critically infested plants, has the potential to decrease the overall input costs on chemicals and reduce the negative environmental impacts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deep learning-based sow posture classifier using colour and depth images Assessing plant pigmentation impacts: A novel approach integrating UAV and multispectral data to analyze atrazine metabolite effects from soil contamination Field scale wheat yield prediction using ensemble machine learning techniques Developing a reference method for indirect measurement of pasture evapotranspiration at sub-meter spatial resolution Public irrigation decision support systems (IDSS) in Italy: Description, evaluation and national context overview
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1