探索焙烤食品中的减糖技术:添加了天然香料的饼干的物理化学和感官特征

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ijgfs.2024.100990
Cristine da Silva Medeiros , Cristina Proserpio , Amanda Soares Bandeira , Marina Rocha Komeroski , Alessandro de Oliveira Rios , Martine Elisabeth Kienzle Hagen , Ella Pagliarini , Viviani Ruffo de Oliveira
{"title":"探索焙烤食品中的减糖技术:添加了天然香料的饼干的物理化学和感官特征","authors":"Cristine da Silva Medeiros ,&nbsp;Cristina Proserpio ,&nbsp;Amanda Soares Bandeira ,&nbsp;Marina Rocha Komeroski ,&nbsp;Alessandro de Oliveira Rios ,&nbsp;Martine Elisabeth Kienzle Hagen ,&nbsp;Ella Pagliarini ,&nbsp;Viviani Ruffo de Oliveira","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgfs.2024.100990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper aimed at evaluating physico-chemical quality, sensory description, and drivers of liking of biscuits made with reduced sugar content and added natural aromas: vanilla (V), cinnamon (CA), and ripe lemon (L) to a standard formulation (S). Liking assessment as well as a descriptive sensory analyses by means of Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) questionnaire were performed on biscuit samples. There was no statistically significant difference among treatments for initial and final height, spread ratio, fracturing, and hardness. The formulations L and CA showed statistically significant difference (p &lt; 0.05) concerning initial and final weight. The formulation L presented the highest averages for apparent and specific volume when compared to S. There was a statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) for the lightness “L” (69.1) being significantly lighter than CA (65.1). Chemical analysis demonstrated statistically significant difference in ashes and protein for S, but not for moisture, lipids, carbohydrates, and calories. All biscuits were accepted by the consumers. In particular, S was the preferred one (76.5) and was comparable to L (71.6). Biscuits with cinnamon (CA) and vanilla (V) aromas obtained comparable liking scores (58.2 and 53.8, respectively). Check-All-That-Apply results showed that sweet taste was crucial in influencing consumers’ acceptance. The most promising biscuit was lemon flavored one (L), which was described by sensory attributes similar to S and the ideal biscuits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48594,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100990"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring sugar reduction in bakery products: Physico-chemical and sensory characterization of biscuits added with natural aromas\",\"authors\":\"Cristine da Silva Medeiros ,&nbsp;Cristina Proserpio ,&nbsp;Amanda Soares Bandeira ,&nbsp;Marina Rocha Komeroski ,&nbsp;Alessandro de Oliveira Rios ,&nbsp;Martine Elisabeth Kienzle Hagen ,&nbsp;Ella Pagliarini ,&nbsp;Viviani Ruffo de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijgfs.2024.100990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper aimed at evaluating physico-chemical quality, sensory description, and drivers of liking of biscuits made with reduced sugar content and added natural aromas: vanilla (V), cinnamon (CA), and ripe lemon (L) to a standard formulation (S). Liking assessment as well as a descriptive sensory analyses by means of Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) questionnaire were performed on biscuit samples. There was no statistically significant difference among treatments for initial and final height, spread ratio, fracturing, and hardness. The formulations L and CA showed statistically significant difference (p &lt; 0.05) concerning initial and final weight. The formulation L presented the highest averages for apparent and specific volume when compared to S. There was a statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) for the lightness “L” (69.1) being significantly lighter than CA (65.1). Chemical analysis demonstrated statistically significant difference in ashes and protein for S, but not for moisture, lipids, carbohydrates, and calories. All biscuits were accepted by the consumers. In particular, S was the preferred one (76.5) and was comparable to L (71.6). Biscuits with cinnamon (CA) and vanilla (V) aromas obtained comparable liking scores (58.2 and 53.8, respectively). Check-All-That-Apply results showed that sweet taste was crucial in influencing consumers’ acceptance. The most promising biscuit was lemon flavored one (L), which was described by sensory attributes similar to S and the ideal biscuits.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100990\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878450X24001239\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878450X24001239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在评估饼干的理化质量、感官描述和喜好驱动因素,这些饼干在标准配方(S)的基础上降低了糖含量,并添加了天然香气:香草(V)、肉桂(CA)和熟柠檬(L)。对饼干样品进行了喜爱度评估,并通过 "检查-评估-应用"(CATA)问卷进行了描述性感官分析。在初始和最终高度、铺展率、断裂和硬度方面,各处理之间没有明显的统计学差异。配方 L 和 CA 在初始重量和最终重量方面的差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。在轻度方面,"L"(69.1)明显轻于 CA(65.1),差异有统计学意义(p ≤ 0.05)。化学分析结果表明,S 型饼干的灰分和蛋白质在统计学上有明显差异,但水分、脂类、碳水化合物和热量的差异不大。所有饼干都被消费者接受。其中,S 是首选(76.5),与 L(71.6)相当。带有肉桂香味(CA)和香草香味(V)的饼干获得的喜爱度得分相当(分别为 58.2 分和 53.8 分)。检测结果表明,甜味是影响消费者接受度的关键因素。最有前途的饼干是柠檬味饼干(L),其感官属性与 S 和理想饼干相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring sugar reduction in bakery products: Physico-chemical and sensory characterization of biscuits added with natural aromas

This paper aimed at evaluating physico-chemical quality, sensory description, and drivers of liking of biscuits made with reduced sugar content and added natural aromas: vanilla (V), cinnamon (CA), and ripe lemon (L) to a standard formulation (S). Liking assessment as well as a descriptive sensory analyses by means of Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) questionnaire were performed on biscuit samples. There was no statistically significant difference among treatments for initial and final height, spread ratio, fracturing, and hardness. The formulations L and CA showed statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) concerning initial and final weight. The formulation L presented the highest averages for apparent and specific volume when compared to S. There was a statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) for the lightness “L” (69.1) being significantly lighter than CA (65.1). Chemical analysis demonstrated statistically significant difference in ashes and protein for S, but not for moisture, lipids, carbohydrates, and calories. All biscuits were accepted by the consumers. In particular, S was the preferred one (76.5) and was comparable to L (71.6). Biscuits with cinnamon (CA) and vanilla (V) aromas obtained comparable liking scores (58.2 and 53.8, respectively). Check-All-That-Apply results showed that sweet taste was crucial in influencing consumers’ acceptance. The most promising biscuit was lemon flavored one (L), which was described by sensory attributes similar to S and the ideal biscuits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science
International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
170
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science is a peer-reviewed journal that explicitly focuses on the interface of food science and gastronomy. Articles focusing only on food science will not be considered. This journal equally encourages both scientists and chefs to publish original scientific papers, review articles and original culinary works. We seek articles with clear evidence of this interaction. From a scientific perspective, this publication aims to become the home for research from the whole community of food science and gastronomy. IJGFS explores all aspects related to the growing field of the interaction of gastronomy and food science, in areas such as food chemistry, food technology and culinary techniques, food microbiology, genetics, sensory science, neuroscience, psychology, culinary concepts, culinary trends, and gastronomic experience (all the elements that contribute to the appreciation and enjoyment of the meal. Also relevant is research on science-based educational programs in gastronomy, anthropology, gastronomic history and food sociology. All these areas of knowledge are crucial to gastronomy, as they contribute to a better understanding of this broad term and its practical implications for science and society.
期刊最新文献
Gastronomy as a diplomatic tool: A systematic literature review Exploring the marination of colonial cheese into wine and vinegar through ripening: Physicochemical characteristics, sensorial attributes and emotions evoked Quality and authenticity of saffron and sensory aspects Bamboo shoot powder: Characterization and application in culinary processed cheese “Requeijão” Ethnic meat products- A review on Indian Gastronomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1