利用机载激光扫描和多光谱数据预测北方森林的树种构成

IF 5.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of Remote Sensing Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1016/j.srs.2024.100154
Jaime Candelas Bielza , Lennart Noordermeer , Erik Næsset , Terje Gobakken , Johannes Breidenbach , Hans Ole Ørka
{"title":"利用机载激光扫描和多光谱数据预测北方森林的树种构成","authors":"Jaime Candelas Bielza ,&nbsp;Lennart Noordermeer ,&nbsp;Erik Næsset ,&nbsp;Terje Gobakken ,&nbsp;Johannes Breidenbach ,&nbsp;Hans Ole Ørka","doi":"10.1016/j.srs.2024.100154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tree species composition is essential information for forest management and remotely sensed (RS) data have proven to be useful for its prediction. In forest management inventories, tree species are commonly interpreted manually from aerial images for each stand, which is time and resource consuming and entails substantial uncertainty. The objective of this study was to evaluate a range of RS data sources comprising airborne laser scanning (ALS) and airborne and satellite-borne multispectral data for model-based prediction of tree species composition. Total volume was predicted using non-linear regression and volume proportions of species were predicted using parametric Dirichlet models. Predicted dominant species was defined as the species with the greatest predicted volume proportion and predicted species-specific volumes were calculated as the product of predicted total volume multiplied by predicted volume proportions. Ground reference data obtained from 1184 sample plots of 250 m<sup>2</sup> in eight districts in Norway were used. Combinations of ALS and two multispectral data sources, i.e. aerial images and Sentinel-2 satellite images from different seasons, were compared. The most accurate predictions of tree species composition were obtained by combining ALS and multi-season Sentinel-2 imagery, specifically from summer and fall. Independent validation of predicted species proportions yielded average root mean square differences (RMSD) of 0.15, 0.15 and 0.07 (relative RMSD of 30%, 68% and 128%) and squared Pearson's correlation coefficient (r<sup>2</sup>) of 0.74, 0.79 and 0.51 for Norway spruce (<em>Picea abies</em> (L.) Karst.), Scots pine (<em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L.) and deciduous species, respectively. The dominant species was predicted with median values of overall accuracy, quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement of 0.90, 0.07 and 0.00, respectively. Predicted species-specific volumes yielded average values of RMSD of 63, 48 and 23 m<sup>3</sup>/ha (relative RMSD of 39%, 94% and 158%) and r<sup>2</sup> of 0.84, 0.60 and 0.53 for spruce, pine and deciduous species, respectively. In one of the districts with independent validation plots of mean size 3700 m<sup>2</sup>, predictions of the dominant species were compared to results obtained through manual photo-interpretation. The model predictions gave greater accuracy than manual photo-interpretation. This study highlights the utility of RS data for prediction of tree species composition in operational forest inventories, particularly indicating the utility of ALS and multi-season Sentinel-2 imagery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101147,"journal":{"name":"Science of Remote Sensing","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100154"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000385/pdfft?md5=d681df750ffcb4aad15b1ca7a324f9ae&pid=1-s2.0-S2666017224000385-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting tree species composition using airborne laser scanning and multispectral data in boreal forests\",\"authors\":\"Jaime Candelas Bielza ,&nbsp;Lennart Noordermeer ,&nbsp;Erik Næsset ,&nbsp;Terje Gobakken ,&nbsp;Johannes Breidenbach ,&nbsp;Hans Ole Ørka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.srs.2024.100154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Tree species composition is essential information for forest management and remotely sensed (RS) data have proven to be useful for its prediction. In forest management inventories, tree species are commonly interpreted manually from aerial images for each stand, which is time and resource consuming and entails substantial uncertainty. The objective of this study was to evaluate a range of RS data sources comprising airborne laser scanning (ALS) and airborne and satellite-borne multispectral data for model-based prediction of tree species composition. Total volume was predicted using non-linear regression and volume proportions of species were predicted using parametric Dirichlet models. Predicted dominant species was defined as the species with the greatest predicted volume proportion and predicted species-specific volumes were calculated as the product of predicted total volume multiplied by predicted volume proportions. Ground reference data obtained from 1184 sample plots of 250 m<sup>2</sup> in eight districts in Norway were used. Combinations of ALS and two multispectral data sources, i.e. aerial images and Sentinel-2 satellite images from different seasons, were compared. The most accurate predictions of tree species composition were obtained by combining ALS and multi-season Sentinel-2 imagery, specifically from summer and fall. Independent validation of predicted species proportions yielded average root mean square differences (RMSD) of 0.15, 0.15 and 0.07 (relative RMSD of 30%, 68% and 128%) and squared Pearson's correlation coefficient (r<sup>2</sup>) of 0.74, 0.79 and 0.51 for Norway spruce (<em>Picea abies</em> (L.) Karst.), Scots pine (<em>Pinus sylvestris</em> L.) and deciduous species, respectively. The dominant species was predicted with median values of overall accuracy, quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement of 0.90, 0.07 and 0.00, respectively. Predicted species-specific volumes yielded average values of RMSD of 63, 48 and 23 m<sup>3</sup>/ha (relative RMSD of 39%, 94% and 158%) and r<sup>2</sup> of 0.84, 0.60 and 0.53 for spruce, pine and deciduous species, respectively. In one of the districts with independent validation plots of mean size 3700 m<sup>2</sup>, predictions of the dominant species were compared to results obtained through manual photo-interpretation. The model predictions gave greater accuracy than manual photo-interpretation. This study highlights the utility of RS data for prediction of tree species composition in operational forest inventories, particularly indicating the utility of ALS and multi-season Sentinel-2 imagery.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of Remote Sensing\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000385/pdfft?md5=d681df750ffcb4aad15b1ca7a324f9ae&pid=1-s2.0-S2666017224000385-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of Remote Sensing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017224000385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

树种组成是森林管理的基本信息,而遥感(RS)数据已被证明有助于预测树种组成。在森林管理调查中,树种通常是通过航空图像对每个林分进行人工判读的,这既耗费时间和资源,又存在很大的不确定性。本研究的目的是评估一系列 RS 数据源,包括机载激光扫描(ALS)、机载和卫星多光谱数据,用于基于模型的树种组成预测。使用非线性回归预测总体积,使用参数 Dirichlet 模型预测物种的体积比例。预测的优势树种被定义为预测体积比例最大的树种,而预测的特定树种体积则计算为预测总体积乘以预测体积比例的乘积。使用了从挪威 8 个地区 1184 块 250 平方米样地获得的地面参考数据。比较了 ALS 与两种多光谱数据源(即不同季节的航空图像和哨兵-2 卫星图像)的组合。通过结合 ALS 和多季节 Sentinel-2 图像,特别是夏季和秋季的图像,对树种组成的预测最为准确。对预测的物种比例进行独立验证后发现,挪威云杉(Picea abies (L.) Karst.)、苏格兰松(Pinus sylvestris L.)和落叶物种的平均均方根差(RMSD)分别为 0.15、0.15 和 0.07(相对均方根差分别为 30%、68% 和 128%),皮尔逊相关系数平方值(r2)分别为 0.74、0.79 和 0.51。预测优势树种的总体准确度、数量差异和分配差异的中值分别为 0.90、0.07 和 0.00。云杉、松树和落叶树种的特定树种预测数量的均方根误差值分别为 63、48 和 23 立方米/公顷(相对均方根误差值分别为 39%、94% 和 158%),r2 分别为 0.84、0.60 和 0.53。在其中一个拥有平均面积为 3700 平方米的独立验证地块的地区,对优势物种的预测结果与人工照片判读结果进行了比较。与人工照片判读相比,模型预测的准确性更高。这项研究凸显了 RS 数据在实际森林资源调查中预测树种组成的实用性,尤其表明了 ALS 和多季节 Sentinel-2 图像的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting tree species composition using airborne laser scanning and multispectral data in boreal forests

Tree species composition is essential information for forest management and remotely sensed (RS) data have proven to be useful for its prediction. In forest management inventories, tree species are commonly interpreted manually from aerial images for each stand, which is time and resource consuming and entails substantial uncertainty. The objective of this study was to evaluate a range of RS data sources comprising airborne laser scanning (ALS) and airborne and satellite-borne multispectral data for model-based prediction of tree species composition. Total volume was predicted using non-linear regression and volume proportions of species were predicted using parametric Dirichlet models. Predicted dominant species was defined as the species with the greatest predicted volume proportion and predicted species-specific volumes were calculated as the product of predicted total volume multiplied by predicted volume proportions. Ground reference data obtained from 1184 sample plots of 250 m2 in eight districts in Norway were used. Combinations of ALS and two multispectral data sources, i.e. aerial images and Sentinel-2 satellite images from different seasons, were compared. The most accurate predictions of tree species composition were obtained by combining ALS and multi-season Sentinel-2 imagery, specifically from summer and fall. Independent validation of predicted species proportions yielded average root mean square differences (RMSD) of 0.15, 0.15 and 0.07 (relative RMSD of 30%, 68% and 128%) and squared Pearson's correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.74, 0.79 and 0.51 for Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.), Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and deciduous species, respectively. The dominant species was predicted with median values of overall accuracy, quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement of 0.90, 0.07 and 0.00, respectively. Predicted species-specific volumes yielded average values of RMSD of 63, 48 and 23 m3/ha (relative RMSD of 39%, 94% and 158%) and r2 of 0.84, 0.60 and 0.53 for spruce, pine and deciduous species, respectively. In one of the districts with independent validation plots of mean size 3700 m2, predictions of the dominant species were compared to results obtained through manual photo-interpretation. The model predictions gave greater accuracy than manual photo-interpretation. This study highlights the utility of RS data for prediction of tree species composition in operational forest inventories, particularly indicating the utility of ALS and multi-season Sentinel-2 imagery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coastal vertical land motion across Southeast Asia derived from combining tide gauge and satellite altimetry observations Identifying thermokarst lakes using deep learning and high-resolution satellite images A two-stage deep learning architecture for detection global coastal and offshore submesoscale ocean eddy using SDGSAT-1 multispectral imagery A comprehensive evaluation of satellite-based and reanalysis soil moisture products over the upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia A comprehensive review of rice mapping from satellite data: Algorithms, product characteristics and consistency assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1