纤维环切除的形状和大小改变了椎间盘的生物力学。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1177/21925682241270090
Mao-Dan Nie, Ze-Bin Huang, Rong-Shan Cheng, Qiang Zhang, Ji-Ping Zhang, Ling-Jie Fu, Cheng-Kung Cheng
{"title":"纤维环切除的形状和大小改变了椎间盘的生物力学。","authors":"Mao-Dan Nie, Ze-Bin Huang, Rong-Shan Cheng, Qiang Zhang, Ji-Ping Zhang, Ling-Jie Fu, Cheng-Kung Cheng","doi":"10.1177/21925682241270090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Biomechanical testings and finite element analysis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate how annulus fibrosus (AF) incision size (RIS, Ratio of incision width to AF height) and shape affect intervertebral disc (IVD) biomechanics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A validated finite element model of lumbar spines simulated various incisions in the middle-right posterior region of the AF, with different sizes and shapes. Simulations included axial compression, flexion, extension, bending, and rotation. Parameters assessed included stability, re-herniation, and IVD degeneration by analyzing stress, height, Intradiscal pressure (IDP), and the range of motion (ROM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Incision increased AF stress and ROM under 3 Nm moment, with values rising as RIS increased. RIS exceeding 40% resulted in a 20% AF stress increase during compression and extension, while RIS over 50% led to over 20% AF stress increase during other motions. Incision stress also increased with higher RIS, particularly surpassing 50% RIS. IDP rose across all incision shapes. Endplate stress increased (9.9%-48.9%) with larger incisions, with average increases of 12.8%, 12.7%, 30.5%, and 22.8% for circular, oval, square, and rectangular incisions. Compression and rotation minimally affected NP pressure (<15%), while flexion (19.8%-38.8%) and bending (18.5%-43.9%) had a more pronounced effect. ROM increased with RIS (20.0% ∼ 77.4%), especially with an incision RIS exceeding 40%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AF injury elevates AF stress, reduces spine stability, heightens degeneration risk with increasing RIS. Reherniation risk rises when RIS exceeds 40%. Circular or oval incisions maintain spine biomechanics better than square or rectangular ones.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shape and Size of the Annulus Fibrosus Excision Alters the Biomechanics of the Intervertebral Disc.\",\"authors\":\"Mao-Dan Nie, Ze-Bin Huang, Rong-Shan Cheng, Qiang Zhang, Ji-Ping Zhang, Ling-Jie Fu, Cheng-Kung Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682241270090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Biomechanical testings and finite element analysis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate how annulus fibrosus (AF) incision size (RIS, Ratio of incision width to AF height) and shape affect intervertebral disc (IVD) biomechanics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A validated finite element model of lumbar spines simulated various incisions in the middle-right posterior region of the AF, with different sizes and shapes. Simulations included axial compression, flexion, extension, bending, and rotation. Parameters assessed included stability, re-herniation, and IVD degeneration by analyzing stress, height, Intradiscal pressure (IDP), and the range of motion (ROM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Incision increased AF stress and ROM under 3 Nm moment, with values rising as RIS increased. RIS exceeding 40% resulted in a 20% AF stress increase during compression and extension, while RIS over 50% led to over 20% AF stress increase during other motions. Incision stress also increased with higher RIS, particularly surpassing 50% RIS. IDP rose across all incision shapes. Endplate stress increased (9.9%-48.9%) with larger incisions, with average increases of 12.8%, 12.7%, 30.5%, and 22.8% for circular, oval, square, and rectangular incisions. Compression and rotation minimally affected NP pressure (<15%), while flexion (19.8%-38.8%) and bending (18.5%-43.9%) had a more pronounced effect. ROM increased with RIS (20.0% ∼ 77.4%), especially with an incision RIS exceeding 40%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AF injury elevates AF stress, reduces spine stability, heightens degeneration risk with increasing RIS. Reherniation risk rises when RIS exceeds 40%. Circular or oval incisions maintain spine biomechanics better than square or rectangular ones.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241270090\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241270090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计生物力学测试和有限元分析:本研究旨在探讨纤维环切口大小(RIS,切口宽度与纤维环高度之比)和形状如何影响椎间盘(IVD)生物力学:经过验证的腰椎有限元模型模拟了椎间盘突出症(AF)中右后区不同大小和形状的各种切口。模拟包括轴向压缩、屈曲、伸展、弯曲和旋转。通过分析应力、高度、椎间盘内压力(IDP)和活动范围(ROM),评估的参数包括稳定性、再疝和 IVD 退化:结果:在3牛米力矩下,切口增加了房颤应力和ROM,随着RIS的增加,应力和ROM值也随之增加。RIS 超过 40% 会导致压缩和伸展时的 AF 应力增加 20%,而 RIS 超过 50% 则会导致其他运动时的 AF 应力增加 20% 以上。切口应力也随着 RIS 的增加而增加,特别是 RIS 超过 50%。所有切口形状的IDP都有所增加。切口越大,终板应力越高(9.9%-48.9%),圆形、椭圆形、方形和矩形切口的平均增幅分别为12.8%、12.7%、30.5%和22.8%。压迫和旋转对 NP 压力的影响很小(结论:房颤损伤会增加房颤应力,降低脊柱稳定性,并随着 RIS 的增加而增加退变风险。当 RIS 超过 40% 时,再疝风险上升。圆形或椭圆形切口比方形或矩形切口更能保持脊柱的生物力学特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shape and Size of the Annulus Fibrosus Excision Alters the Biomechanics of the Intervertebral Disc.

Study design: Biomechanical testings and finite element analysis.

Objectives: This study aims to investigate how annulus fibrosus (AF) incision size (RIS, Ratio of incision width to AF height) and shape affect intervertebral disc (IVD) biomechanics.

Methods: A validated finite element model of lumbar spines simulated various incisions in the middle-right posterior region of the AF, with different sizes and shapes. Simulations included axial compression, flexion, extension, bending, and rotation. Parameters assessed included stability, re-herniation, and IVD degeneration by analyzing stress, height, Intradiscal pressure (IDP), and the range of motion (ROM).

Results: Incision increased AF stress and ROM under 3 Nm moment, with values rising as RIS increased. RIS exceeding 40% resulted in a 20% AF stress increase during compression and extension, while RIS over 50% led to over 20% AF stress increase during other motions. Incision stress also increased with higher RIS, particularly surpassing 50% RIS. IDP rose across all incision shapes. Endplate stress increased (9.9%-48.9%) with larger incisions, with average increases of 12.8%, 12.7%, 30.5%, and 22.8% for circular, oval, square, and rectangular incisions. Compression and rotation minimally affected NP pressure (<15%), while flexion (19.8%-38.8%) and bending (18.5%-43.9%) had a more pronounced effect. ROM increased with RIS (20.0% ∼ 77.4%), especially with an incision RIS exceeding 40%.

Conclusions: AF injury elevates AF stress, reduces spine stability, heightens degeneration risk with increasing RIS. Reherniation risk rises when RIS exceeds 40%. Circular or oval incisions maintain spine biomechanics better than square or rectangular ones.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Coronal Malalignment Following Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgery (CMIS) for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction. Current Applications and Future Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery and Research: A Narrative Review and Commentary. Surgical Specialty Outcome Differences for Major Spinal Procedures in Low-Acuity Patients. The Effect of Osteopenia and Osteoporosis on Screw Loosening in MIS-TLIF and Dynamic Stabilization. Learning Curve of Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant and Aggregated Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1