腰背痛患者对使用成像技术的看法:一项以中等收入国家为背景的横断面研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION PM&R Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13237
Leandro M Diniz, Ítalo R Lemes, Ana P C F Freire, Ana F Guimarães, Lucas A C Ferreira, Marcia R Franco, Arianne P Verhagen, Guy Simoneau, Rafael Z Pinto
{"title":"腰背痛患者对使用成像技术的看法:一项以中等收入国家为背景的横断面研究。","authors":"Leandro M Diniz, Ítalo R Lemes, Ana P C F Freire, Ana F Guimarães, Lucas A C Ferreira, Marcia R Franco, Arianne P Verhagen, Guy Simoneau, Rafael Z Pinto","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with low back pain may play an active role in the prescription of excessive spine imaging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the proportion of patients with low back pain who have beliefs not aligned with current evidence regarding the use of imaging and to identify factors associated with these beliefs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of baseline data of a previously published randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient physical therapy clinic in a middle-income country.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Individuals with non-specific low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Outcome variables were two statements assessing the extent of patient agreement on the need for imaging in the management of low back pain. The predictor variables were age, educational level, duration of symptoms, disability level, pain intensity in the last 24 hours, beliefs about inevitable consequences of low back pain (assessed using the Back Belief Questionnaire), and having received imaging previously. Multivariable logistic models were used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Level of agreement with Statement 1: X-rays or scans are necessary to get the best medical care for low back pain and Statement 2: Everyone with low back pain should have spine imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 159 patients were included. Of these, 88.1% believed that imaging was necessary for the best medical care for low back pain and 62.9% believed that everyone with low back pain should obtain imaging. Lower scores on the Back Belief Questionnaire were associated with beliefs that imaging was necessary (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81, 0.99) and low education level was associated with the belief that everyone with low back pain should obtain imaging (OR = 3.03, 95% CI: 1.38, 6.61), after controlling for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nearly 90% of patients believe that spine imaging is necessary for the management of low back pain. Beliefs about the inevitable consequences of low back pain and low education level may be factors that need to be considered when developing new interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beliefs regarding the use of imaging among patients with low back pain: A cross-sectional study in the context of a middle-income country.\",\"authors\":\"Leandro M Diniz, Ítalo R Lemes, Ana P C F Freire, Ana F Guimarães, Lucas A C Ferreira, Marcia R Franco, Arianne P Verhagen, Guy Simoneau, Rafael Z Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.13237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with low back pain may play an active role in the prescription of excessive spine imaging.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the proportion of patients with low back pain who have beliefs not aligned with current evidence regarding the use of imaging and to identify factors associated with these beliefs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of baseline data of a previously published randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient physical therapy clinic in a middle-income country.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Individuals with non-specific low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Outcome variables were two statements assessing the extent of patient agreement on the need for imaging in the management of low back pain. The predictor variables were age, educational level, duration of symptoms, disability level, pain intensity in the last 24 hours, beliefs about inevitable consequences of low back pain (assessed using the Back Belief Questionnaire), and having received imaging previously. Multivariable logistic models were used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Level of agreement with Statement 1: X-rays or scans are necessary to get the best medical care for low back pain and Statement 2: Everyone with low back pain should have spine imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 159 patients were included. Of these, 88.1% believed that imaging was necessary for the best medical care for low back pain and 62.9% believed that everyone with low back pain should obtain imaging. Lower scores on the Back Belief Questionnaire were associated with beliefs that imaging was necessary (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81, 0.99) and low education level was associated with the belief that everyone with low back pain should obtain imaging (OR = 3.03, 95% CI: 1.38, 6.61), after controlling for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nearly 90% of patients believe that spine imaging is necessary for the management of low back pain. Beliefs about the inevitable consequences of low back pain and low education level may be factors that need to be considered when developing new interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PM&R\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PM&R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13237\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:腰背痛患者可能在过度脊柱造影处方中扮演积极角色:腰背痛患者可能在过度脊柱造影处方中扮演积极角色:目的:确定在腰背痛患者中,有多大比例的患者在使用影像学检查时持有与当前证据不一致的观念,并找出与这些观念相关的因素:设计:对之前发表的一项随机临床试验的基线数据进行二次分析:患者:非特异性腰痛患者:患者:非特异性腰背痛患者:结果变量为两份陈述,评估患者对腰背痛治疗中成像需求的认同程度。预测变量包括年龄、受教育程度、症状持续时间、残疾程度、过去 24 小时内的疼痛强度、对腰背痛不可避免的后果的看法(使用背部信念问卷进行评估)以及之前是否接受过影像学检查。数据分析采用多变量逻辑模型:对声明 1:X 光或扫描是腰背痛获得最佳医疗护理的必要条件和声明 2:每个腰背痛患者都应接受脊柱成像的同意程度:结果:共纳入 159 名患者。其中,88.1% 的人认为,为了获得腰背痛的最佳医疗护理,有必要进行造影检查;62.9% 的人认为,每个腰背痛患者都应进行造影检查。在控制了潜在的混杂因素后,背部信念问卷得分较低的患者认为有必要进行影像学检查(几率比[OR] = 0.90,95% 置信区间[CI]:0.81, 0.99),而教育水平较低的患者认为每个腰背痛患者都应进行影像学检查(OR = 3.03,95% 置信区间[CI]:1.38, 6.61):结论:近 90% 的患者认为脊柱造影是治疗腰背痛的必要手段。关于腰背痛不可避免的后果和教育水平低的观念可能是在制定新的干预措施时需要考虑的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beliefs regarding the use of imaging among patients with low back pain: A cross-sectional study in the context of a middle-income country.

Introduction: Patients with low back pain may play an active role in the prescription of excessive spine imaging.

Objective: To determine the proportion of patients with low back pain who have beliefs not aligned with current evidence regarding the use of imaging and to identify factors associated with these beliefs.

Design: Secondary analysis of baseline data of a previously published randomized clinical trial.

Setting: Outpatient physical therapy clinic in a middle-income country.

Patients: Individuals with non-specific low back pain.

Methods: Outcome variables were two statements assessing the extent of patient agreement on the need for imaging in the management of low back pain. The predictor variables were age, educational level, duration of symptoms, disability level, pain intensity in the last 24 hours, beliefs about inevitable consequences of low back pain (assessed using the Back Belief Questionnaire), and having received imaging previously. Multivariable logistic models were used for data analysis.

Main outcome measure(s): Level of agreement with Statement 1: X-rays or scans are necessary to get the best medical care for low back pain and Statement 2: Everyone with low back pain should have spine imaging.

Results: A total of 159 patients were included. Of these, 88.1% believed that imaging was necessary for the best medical care for low back pain and 62.9% believed that everyone with low back pain should obtain imaging. Lower scores on the Back Belief Questionnaire were associated with beliefs that imaging was necessary (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81, 0.99) and low education level was associated with the belief that everyone with low back pain should obtain imaging (OR = 3.03, 95% CI: 1.38, 6.61), after controlling for potential confounders.

Conclusion: Nearly 90% of patients believe that spine imaging is necessary for the management of low back pain. Beliefs about the inevitable consequences of low back pain and low education level may be factors that need to be considered when developing new interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
期刊最新文献
Physical medicine and rehabilitation clerkships in medical school: A valuable and integrated addition to the advanced clerkships. Student concussion symptoms and tailored accommodations during use of a return to learn program in 13 public high schools. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided A1 pulley release utilizing a modified 20-gauge spinal needle. Self-perceived preparedness for practice among graduating physical medicine & rehabilitation residents. Knee joint mechanics during gait after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a partial or full thickness quadriceps tendon autograft at 2 years after surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1