全面评估脑瘫患者的牙周健康:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Special Care in Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1111/scd.13049
Thais Alves de Oliveira, Victor Zanetti Drumond, Anna Carolina Rye Sato Kimura, José Alcides Almeida de Arruda, Sharat Chandra Pani, Ricardo Alves Mesquita, Najara Barbosa da Rocha, Lucas Guimarães Abreu
{"title":"全面评估脑瘫患者的牙周健康:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Thais Alves de Oliveira, Victor Zanetti Drumond, Anna Carolina Rye Sato Kimura, José Alcides Almeida de Arruda, Sharat Chandra Pani, Ricardo Alves Mesquita, Najara Barbosa da Rocha, Lucas Guimarães Abreu","doi":"10.1111/scd.13049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Cerebral palsy (CP) is the term for a set of neurological disorders resulting from brain damage that impairs motor function. The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine whether individuals with CP are at a greater risk of negative periodontal health outcomes compared to those without CP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study followed the recommendations of the MOOSE guidelines. Electronic searches were conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Ovid, Embase, and PsycInfo databases. Observational studies assessing periodontal outcomes in individuals with CP were included. Risk of bias was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analyses were conducted and the results were presented using standardized mean differences (SMD), odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The strength of the evidence was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 316 records were retrieved from the electronic databases, 17 of which were included in the qualitative synthesis. Meta-analyses revealed significantly higher scores in individuals with CP compared to those without CP for the oral hygiene index (SMD = 0.47 [95% CI: 0.17-0.78, I<sup>2</sup> = 80%), gingival index (SMD = 0.75 [95% CI: 0.39-1.11], I<sup>2</sup> = 79%), plaque index (SMD = 0.70 [95% CI: 0.07-1.33], I<sup>2</sup> = 93%), and calculus index (SMD = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.76-1.20], I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). However, no significant difference was found between groups for the prevalence of gingivitis (OR = 1.27 [95% CI: 0.28-5.66], I<sup>2</sup> = 93%). The risk of bias for the outcome assessment and statistical tests was low. The strength of the evidence was deemed very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with CP may experience more significant negative periodontal health outcomes compared to those without CP.</p>","PeriodicalId":47470,"journal":{"name":"Special Care in Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive assessment of periodontal health in cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Thais Alves de Oliveira, Victor Zanetti Drumond, Anna Carolina Rye Sato Kimura, José Alcides Almeida de Arruda, Sharat Chandra Pani, Ricardo Alves Mesquita, Najara Barbosa da Rocha, Lucas Guimarães Abreu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/scd.13049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Cerebral palsy (CP) is the term for a set of neurological disorders resulting from brain damage that impairs motor function. The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine whether individuals with CP are at a greater risk of negative periodontal health outcomes compared to those without CP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study followed the recommendations of the MOOSE guidelines. Electronic searches were conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Ovid, Embase, and PsycInfo databases. Observational studies assessing periodontal outcomes in individuals with CP were included. Risk of bias was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analyses were conducted and the results were presented using standardized mean differences (SMD), odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The strength of the evidence was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 316 records were retrieved from the electronic databases, 17 of which were included in the qualitative synthesis. Meta-analyses revealed significantly higher scores in individuals with CP compared to those without CP for the oral hygiene index (SMD = 0.47 [95% CI: 0.17-0.78, I<sup>2</sup> = 80%), gingival index (SMD = 0.75 [95% CI: 0.39-1.11], I<sup>2</sup> = 79%), plaque index (SMD = 0.70 [95% CI: 0.07-1.33], I<sup>2</sup> = 93%), and calculus index (SMD = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.76-1.20], I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). However, no significant difference was found between groups for the prevalence of gingivitis (OR = 1.27 [95% CI: 0.28-5.66], I<sup>2</sup> = 93%). The risk of bias for the outcome assessment and statistical tests was low. The strength of the evidence was deemed very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals with CP may experience more significant negative periodontal health outcomes compared to those without CP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Special Care in Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Special Care in Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.13049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special Care in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.13049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:脑性瘫痪(CP)是由脑损伤导致运动功能障碍的一系列神经系统疾病的总称。本研究旨在对文献进行系统性回顾,以确定与无 CP 的患者相比,CP 患者是否有更高的牙周健康负面影响风险:本研究遵循 MOOSE 指南的建议。在 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Ovid、Embase 和 PsycInfo 数据库中进行了电子检索。研究纳入了评估 CP 患者牙周状况的观察性研究。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对偏倚风险进行评估。进行了元分析,并使用标准化均值差异 (SMD)、几率比 (OR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI) 表示分析结果。此外,还对证据的强度进行了评估:结果:从电子数据库中共检索到 316 条记录,其中 17 条被纳入定性综述。Meta 分析表明,与无 CP 患者相比,CP 患者的口腔卫生指数得分明显更高(SMD = 0.47 [95% CI: 0.17-0.78,I2 = 80%)、牙龈指数(SMD = 0.75 [95% CI:0.39-1.11],I2 = 79%)、牙菌斑指数(SMD = 0.70 [95% CI:0.07-1.33],I2 = 93%)和牙结石指数(SMD = 0.98 [95% CI:0.76-1.20],I2 = 0%)。然而,在牙龈炎患病率方面,各组间没有发现明显差异(OR = 1.27 [95% CI:0.28-5.66],I2 = 93%)。结果评估和统计检验的偏倚风险较低。证据强度被认为非常低:与无 CP 的患者相比,有 CP 的患者可能会经历更严重的负面牙周健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comprehensive assessment of periodontal health in cerebral palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aims: Cerebral palsy (CP) is the term for a set of neurological disorders resulting from brain damage that impairs motor function. The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine whether individuals with CP are at a greater risk of negative periodontal health outcomes compared to those without CP.

Methods: This study followed the recommendations of the MOOSE guidelines. Electronic searches were conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Ovid, Embase, and PsycInfo databases. Observational studies assessing periodontal outcomes in individuals with CP were included. Risk of bias was appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Meta-analyses were conducted and the results were presented using standardized mean differences (SMD), odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The strength of the evidence was also assessed.

Results: A total of 316 records were retrieved from the electronic databases, 17 of which were included in the qualitative synthesis. Meta-analyses revealed significantly higher scores in individuals with CP compared to those without CP for the oral hygiene index (SMD = 0.47 [95% CI: 0.17-0.78, I2 = 80%), gingival index (SMD = 0.75 [95% CI: 0.39-1.11], I2 = 79%), plaque index (SMD = 0.70 [95% CI: 0.07-1.33], I2 = 93%), and calculus index (SMD = 0.98 [95% CI: 0.76-1.20], I2 = 0%). However, no significant difference was found between groups for the prevalence of gingivitis (OR = 1.27 [95% CI: 0.28-5.66], I2 = 93%). The risk of bias for the outcome assessment and statistical tests was low. The strength of the evidence was deemed very low.

Conclusion: Individuals with CP may experience more significant negative periodontal health outcomes compared to those without CP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Special Care in Dentistry
Special Care in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: Special Care in Dentistry is the official journal of the Special Care Dentistry Association, the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for Persons with Disabilities, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry. It is the only journal published in North America devoted to improving oral health in people with special needs.
期刊最新文献
Oral complications associated with trigeminal trophic syndrome: A case report. Are orofacial pain assessment tools for adults who cannot self-report pain suitable for dental practice? A scoping review. Dentistry and Sturge-Weber syndrome: Case report and narrative review. Geriatric dentistry course effect against ageism among dental students: A cohort study. Exploring the oral health status of children living with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE): A caregiver described self-report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1