使用各种反馈方法并结合人工智能应用提高牙科学生的放射诊断能力--随机临床试验。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Dental Education Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1111/eje.13028
Sarah Rampf, Holger Gehrig, Andreas Möltner, Martin R. Fischer, Falk Schwendicke, Karin C. Huth
{"title":"使用各种反馈方法并结合人工智能应用提高牙科学生的放射诊断能力--随机临床试验。","authors":"Sarah Rampf,&nbsp;Holger Gehrig,&nbsp;Andreas Möltner,&nbsp;Martin R. Fischer,&nbsp;Falk Schwendicke,&nbsp;Karin C. Huth","doi":"10.1111/eje.13028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Radiographic diagnostic competences are a primary focus of dental education. This study assessed two feedback methods to enhance learning outcomes and explored the feasibility of artificial intelligence (AI) to support education.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Fourth-year dental students had access to 16 virtual radiological example cases for 8 weeks. They were randomly assigned to either elaborated feedback (eF) or knowledge of results feedback (KOR) based on expert consensus. Students´ diagnostic competences were tested on bitewing/periapical radiographs for detection of caries, apical periodontitis, accuracy for all radiological findings and image quality. We additionally assessed the accuracy of an AI system (dentalXrai Pro 3.0), where applicable. Data were analysed descriptively and using ROC analysis (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUC). Groups were compared with Welch's <i>t</i>-test.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 55 students, the eF group by large performed significantly better than the KOR group in detecting enamel caries (accuracy 0.840 ± 0.041, <i>p</i> = .196; sensitivity 0.638 ± 0.204, <i>p</i> = .037; specificity 0.859 ± 0.050, <i>p</i> = .410; ROC AUC 0.748 ± 0.094, <i>p</i> = .020), apical periodontitis (accuracy 0.813 ± 0.095, <i>p</i> = .011; sensitivity 0.476 ± 0.230, <i>p</i> = .003; specificity 0.914 ± 0.108, <i>p</i> = .292; ROC AUC 0.695 ± 0.123, <i>p</i> = .001) and in assessing the image quality of periapical images (<i>p</i> = .031). No significant differences were observed for the other outcomes. The AI showed almost perfect diagnostic performance (enamel caries: accuracy 0.964, sensitivity 0.857, specificity 0.074; dentin caries: accuracy 0.988, sensitivity 0.941, specificity 1.0; overall: accuracy 0.976, sensitivity 0.958, specificity 0.983).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Elaborated feedback can improve student's radiographic diagnostic competences, particularly in detecting enamel caries and apical periodontitis. Using an AI may constitute an alternative to expert labelling of radiographs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50488,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental Education","volume":"28 4","pages":"925-937"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eje.13028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiographical diagnostic competences of dental students using various feedback methods and integrating an artificial intelligence application—A randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Rampf,&nbsp;Holger Gehrig,&nbsp;Andreas Möltner,&nbsp;Martin R. Fischer,&nbsp;Falk Schwendicke,&nbsp;Karin C. Huth\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eje.13028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Radiographic diagnostic competences are a primary focus of dental education. This study assessed two feedback methods to enhance learning outcomes and explored the feasibility of artificial intelligence (AI) to support education.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fourth-year dental students had access to 16 virtual radiological example cases for 8 weeks. They were randomly assigned to either elaborated feedback (eF) or knowledge of results feedback (KOR) based on expert consensus. Students´ diagnostic competences were tested on bitewing/periapical radiographs for detection of caries, apical periodontitis, accuracy for all radiological findings and image quality. We additionally assessed the accuracy of an AI system (dentalXrai Pro 3.0), where applicable. Data were analysed descriptively and using ROC analysis (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUC). Groups were compared with Welch's <i>t</i>-test.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among 55 students, the eF group by large performed significantly better than the KOR group in detecting enamel caries (accuracy 0.840 ± 0.041, <i>p</i> = .196; sensitivity 0.638 ± 0.204, <i>p</i> = .037; specificity 0.859 ± 0.050, <i>p</i> = .410; ROC AUC 0.748 ± 0.094, <i>p</i> = .020), apical periodontitis (accuracy 0.813 ± 0.095, <i>p</i> = .011; sensitivity 0.476 ± 0.230, <i>p</i> = .003; specificity 0.914 ± 0.108, <i>p</i> = .292; ROC AUC 0.695 ± 0.123, <i>p</i> = .001) and in assessing the image quality of periapical images (<i>p</i> = .031). No significant differences were observed for the other outcomes. The AI showed almost perfect diagnostic performance (enamel caries: accuracy 0.964, sensitivity 0.857, specificity 0.074; dentin caries: accuracy 0.988, sensitivity 0.941, specificity 1.0; overall: accuracy 0.976, sensitivity 0.958, specificity 0.983).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Elaborated feedback can improve student's radiographic diagnostic competences, particularly in detecting enamel caries and apical periodontitis. Using an AI may constitute an alternative to expert labelling of radiographs.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Dental Education\",\"volume\":\"28 4\",\"pages\":\"925-937\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eje.13028\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Dental Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eje.13028\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eje.13028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介放射诊断能力是口腔医学教育的主要重点。本研究评估了两种提高学习效果的反馈方法,并探讨了人工智能(AI)支持教育的可行性:四年级的牙科学生可以在 8 周内使用 16 个虚拟放射示例病例。他们被随机分配到详细反馈(eF)或基于专家共识的结果知识反馈(KOR)。学生的诊断能力通过咬合/根尖周X光片进行测试,以检测龋齿、根尖牙周炎、所有放射结果的准确性和图像质量。我们还酌情评估了人工智能系统(dentalXrai Pro 3.0)的准确性。我们对数据进行了描述性分析,并使用 ROC 分析(准确性、灵敏度、特异性、AUC)。组间比较采用韦尔奇 t 检验:在 55 名学生中,eF 组在检测釉质龋方面的表现明显优于 KOR 组(准确性 0.840 ± 0.041,p = .196;灵敏度 0.638 ± 0.204,p = .037;特异性 0.859 ± 0.050,p = .410;ROC AUC 0.748 ± 0.094,p = .020)、根尖牙周炎(准确性 0.813 ± 0.095,p = .011;灵敏度 0.476 ± 0.230,p = .003;特异性 0.914 ± 0.108,p = .292;ROC AUC 0.695 ± 0.123,p = .001)以及在评估根尖周图像质量方面(p = .031)。其他结果无明显差异。人工智能显示出几乎完美的诊断性能(釉质龋:准确性 0.964,敏感性 0.857,特异性 0.074;牙本质龋:准确性 0.988,敏感性 0.941,特异性 1.0;总体:准确性 0.976,敏感性 0.958,特异性 0.983):精心设计的反馈可以提高学生的放射诊断能力,尤其是在检测釉质龋和根尖牙周炎方面。使用人工智能可以替代专家对射线照片进行标注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Radiographical diagnostic competences of dental students using various feedback methods and integrating an artificial intelligence application—A randomized clinical trial

Introduction

Radiographic diagnostic competences are a primary focus of dental education. This study assessed two feedback methods to enhance learning outcomes and explored the feasibility of artificial intelligence (AI) to support education.

Materials and Methods

Fourth-year dental students had access to 16 virtual radiological example cases for 8 weeks. They were randomly assigned to either elaborated feedback (eF) or knowledge of results feedback (KOR) based on expert consensus. Students´ diagnostic competences were tested on bitewing/periapical radiographs for detection of caries, apical periodontitis, accuracy for all radiological findings and image quality. We additionally assessed the accuracy of an AI system (dentalXrai Pro 3.0), where applicable. Data were analysed descriptively and using ROC analysis (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUC). Groups were compared with Welch's t-test.

Results

Among 55 students, the eF group by large performed significantly better than the KOR group in detecting enamel caries (accuracy 0.840 ± 0.041, p = .196; sensitivity 0.638 ± 0.204, p = .037; specificity 0.859 ± 0.050, p = .410; ROC AUC 0.748 ± 0.094, p = .020), apical periodontitis (accuracy 0.813 ± 0.095, p = .011; sensitivity 0.476 ± 0.230, p = .003; specificity 0.914 ± 0.108, p = .292; ROC AUC 0.695 ± 0.123, p = .001) and in assessing the image quality of periapical images (p = .031). No significant differences were observed for the other outcomes. The AI showed almost perfect diagnostic performance (enamel caries: accuracy 0.964, sensitivity 0.857, specificity 0.074; dentin caries: accuracy 0.988, sensitivity 0.941, specificity 1.0; overall: accuracy 0.976, sensitivity 0.958, specificity 0.983).

Conclusion

Elaborated feedback can improve student's radiographic diagnostic competences, particularly in detecting enamel caries and apical periodontitis. Using an AI may constitute an alternative to expert labelling of radiographs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the European Journal of Dental Education is to publish original topical and review articles of the highest quality in the field of Dental Education. The Journal seeks to disseminate widely the latest information on curriculum development teaching methodologies assessment techniques and quality assurance in the fields of dental undergraduate and postgraduate education and dental auxiliary personnel training. The scope includes the dental educational aspects of the basic medical sciences the behavioural sciences the interface with medical education information technology and distance learning and educational audit. Papers embodying the results of high-quality educational research of relevance to dentistry are particularly encouraged as are evidence-based reports of novel and established educational programmes and their outcomes.
期刊最新文献
The Graduating European Dentist Curriculum Framework: A 7-Year Review. Beyond the Drill: Understanding Empathy Among Undergraduate Dental Students. Future-Proofing Dentistry: A Qualitative Exploration of COVID-19 Responses in UK Dental Schools. Mapping the Landscape of Generative Language Models in Dental Education: A Comparison Between ChatGPT and Google Bard. Performance of a Generative Pre-Trained Transformer in Generating Scientific Abstracts in Dentistry: A Comparative Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1