夫妻关系教育内容:我们拥有什么,我们缺少什么

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Family Process Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1111/famp.13043
Sarah E Griffes, Nathan R Hardy, Ty J Gregson, Matthew W Brosi, Brandt Gardner
{"title":"夫妻关系教育内容:我们拥有什么,我们缺少什么","authors":"Sarah E Griffes, Nathan R Hardy, Ty J Gregson, Matthew W Brosi, Brandt Gardner","doi":"10.1111/famp.13043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Couple relationship education (CRE) has decades of research showing mixed results for participants. Various competing frameworks for CRE content have emerged in the development of the field, yet content has not been systematically investigated. Through an inductive content analysis of 15 different CRE programs, this study explored content themes and categories that are common across programs. Analysis found four themes throughout the programs: interactional skills, the self in the relationship, partner bonding, and relationship motivations. Categories for each theme were identified and are presented and discussed. Findings validate the primacy of teaching interactional skills within CRE including consistency in topics (e.g., communication training, conflict management). Other themes were also common (e.g., self in the relationship), though their categories were more diverse (e.g., self-care, expectations, personality). Several factors that have emerged as more significant in relationship theory and research were not well-represented in the content analysis (e.g., socioecological contexts, systemic patterns).</p>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Couple relationship education content: What we have and what we are missing.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah E Griffes, Nathan R Hardy, Ty J Gregson, Matthew W Brosi, Brandt Gardner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/famp.13043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Couple relationship education (CRE) has decades of research showing mixed results for participants. Various competing frameworks for CRE content have emerged in the development of the field, yet content has not been systematically investigated. Through an inductive content analysis of 15 different CRE programs, this study explored content themes and categories that are common across programs. Analysis found four themes throughout the programs: interactional skills, the self in the relationship, partner bonding, and relationship motivations. Categories for each theme were identified and are presented and discussed. Findings validate the primacy of teaching interactional skills within CRE including consistency in topics (e.g., communication training, conflict management). Other themes were also common (e.g., self in the relationship), though their categories were more diverse (e.g., self-care, expectations, personality). Several factors that have emerged as more significant in relationship theory and research were not well-represented in the content analysis (e.g., socioecological contexts, systemic patterns).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Process\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.13043\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.13043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数十年来,夫妻关系教育(CRE)的研究显示,参与者的结果喜忧参半。在该领域的发展过程中,出现了各种相互竞争的 CRE 内容框架,但尚未对内容进行系统的研究。本研究通过对 15 个不同的 CRE 课程进行归纳式内容分析,探索了各课程共有的内容主题和类别。分析发现了贯穿整个课程的四个主题:互动技能、关系中的自我、伴侣纽带和关系动机。每个主题的类别都已确定,并进行了介绍和讨论。研究结果验证了在 CRE 中传授互动技能的重要性,包括主题的一致性(如沟通培训、冲突管理)。其他主题也很常见(如关系中的自我),尽管其类别更加多样化(如自我保健、期望、个性)。一些在人际关系理论和研究中比较重要的因素在内容分析中并没有得到很好的体现(如社 会生态环境、系统模式)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Couple relationship education content: What we have and what we are missing.

Couple relationship education (CRE) has decades of research showing mixed results for participants. Various competing frameworks for CRE content have emerged in the development of the field, yet content has not been systematically investigated. Through an inductive content analysis of 15 different CRE programs, this study explored content themes and categories that are common across programs. Analysis found four themes throughout the programs: interactional skills, the self in the relationship, partner bonding, and relationship motivations. Categories for each theme were identified and are presented and discussed. Findings validate the primacy of teaching interactional skills within CRE including consistency in topics (e.g., communication training, conflict management). Other themes were also common (e.g., self in the relationship), though their categories were more diverse (e.g., self-care, expectations, personality). Several factors that have emerged as more significant in relationship theory and research were not well-represented in the content analysis (e.g., socioecological contexts, systemic patterns).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
期刊最新文献
Informant discrepancy profiles of helicopter parenting and adult children's partner-controlling and partner-controlled behaviors. The Milan Approach today. Parental involvement in Mexican-origin adolescents' romantic relationships: An examination of parents' cultural orientations and parent-youth relationships. Relationship quality and educational attainment links to development of cardiometabolic morbidity and multimorbidity across middle adulthood. Prevalence and predictors of help-seeking steps in a nationally representative Dutch sample of romantic couples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1