对巴西国家卫生系统医院信息系统中的产科住院数据进行验证研究，以监测孕产妇发病率：巴西，2021-2022 年。

IF 2.5 Q1 Multidisciplinary Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude Pub Date : 2024-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/S2237-96222024v33e20231252.en

Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues, Lana Dos Santos Meijinhos, Luis Carlos Torres Guillen, Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias, Valéria Saraceni, Rejane Sobrinho Pinheiro, Natália Santana Paiva, Cláudia Medina Coeli

{"title":"对巴西国家卫生系统医院信息系统中的产科住院数据进行验证研究，以监测孕产妇发病率：巴西，2021-2022 年。","authors":"Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues, Lana Dos Santos Meijinhos, Luis Carlos Torres Guillen, Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias, Valéria Saraceni, Rejane Sobrinho Pinheiro, Natália Santana Paiva, Cláudia Medina Coeli","doi":"10.1590/S2237-96222024v33e20231252.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To validate the Brazilian National Health System Hospital Information System (SIH/SUS) for maternal morbidity surveillance.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in 2021/2022, taking as its reference a national study on maternal morbidity (MMG) conducted in 50 public and 28 private hospitals; we compared SIH/SUS and MMG data for hospitalization frequency, reason and type of discharge and calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios for seven diagnoses and four procedures.Results: Hospitalizations identified on SIH/SUS (32,212) corresponded to 95.1% of hospitalizations assessed by MMG (33,867), with lower recording on SIH/SUS (85.5%) for private hospitals [10,036 (SIH/SUS)]; 11,742 (MMG)]; compared to MMG, SIH/SUS had a lower proportion of hospitalizations due to \"complications during pregnancy\" (9.7% versus 16.5%) as well as under-recording of all diagnoses and procedures assessed, except \"ectopic pregnancy\".Conclusion: Better recording of diagnoses and procedures on SIH/SUS is essential for its use in maternal morbidity surveillance.","PeriodicalId":51473,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude","volume":"33 ","pages":"e20231252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation study of obstetric hospitalization data held on the Brazilian National Health System Hospital Information System for maternal morbidity surveillance: Brazil, 2021-2022.\",\"authors\":\"Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues, Lana Dos Santos Meijinhos, Luis Carlos Torres Guillen, Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias, Valéria Saraceni, Rejane Sobrinho Pinheiro, Natália Santana Paiva, Cláudia Medina Coeli\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S2237-96222024v33e20231252.en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To validate the Brazilian National Health System Hospital Information System (SIH/SUS) for maternal morbidity surveillance.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in 2021/2022, taking as its reference a national study on maternal morbidity (MMG) conducted in 50 public and 28 private hospitals; we compared SIH/SUS and MMG data for hospitalization frequency, reason and type of discharge and calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios for seven diagnoses and four procedures.Results: Hospitalizations identified on SIH/SUS (32,212) corresponded to 95.1% of hospitalizations assessed by MMG (33,867), with lower recording on SIH/SUS (85.5%) for private hospitals [10,036 (SIH/SUS)]; 11,742 (MMG)]; compared to MMG, SIH/SUS had a lower proportion of hospitalizations due to \\\"complications during pregnancy\\\" (9.7% versus 16.5%) as well as under-recording of all diagnoses and procedures assessed, except \\\"ectopic pregnancy\\\".Conclusion: Better recording of diagnoses and procedures on SIH/SUS is essential for its use in maternal morbidity surveillance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"e20231252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11295267/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-96222024v33e20231252.en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-96222024v33e20231252.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的验证巴西国家卫生系统医院信息系统（SIH/SUS）在孕产妇发病率监测方面的有效性：这是一项于 2021/2022 年进行的横断面研究，参照了在 50 家公立医院和 28 家私立医院进行的全国孕产妇发病率研究（MMG）；我们比较了 SIH/SUS 和 MMG 数据中的住院频率、出院原因和类型，并计算了七种诊断和四种手术的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性似然比：结果：SIH/SUS 系统识别的住院病例（32,212 例）与 MMG 系统评估的住院病例（33,867 例）的 95.1%相吻合，而私立医院 SIH/SUS 系统记录的住院病例较少（85.5%）[10]。与 MMG 相比，SIH/SUS 中因 "妊娠并发症 "住院的比例较低（9.7% 对 16.5%），除 "宫外孕 "外，所有诊断和手术均记录不足：结论：更好地记录 SIH/SUS 的诊断和手术对用于孕产妇发病率监测至关重要。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Validation study of obstetric hospitalization data held on the Brazilian National Health System Hospital Information System for maternal morbidity surveillance: Brazil, 2021-2022.

Objective: To validate the Brazilian National Health System Hospital Information System (SIH/SUS) for maternal morbidity surveillance.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in 2021/2022, taking as its reference a national study on maternal morbidity (MMG) conducted in 50 public and 28 private hospitals; we compared SIH/SUS and MMG data for hospitalization frequency, reason and type of discharge and calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios for seven diagnoses and four procedures.

Results: Hospitalizations identified on SIH/SUS (32,212) corresponded to 95.1% of hospitalizations assessed by MMG (33,867), with lower recording on SIH/SUS (85.5%) for private hospitals [10,036 (SIH/SUS)]; 11,742 (MMG)]; compared to MMG, SIH/SUS had a lower proportion of hospitalizations due to "complications during pregnancy" (9.7% versus 16.5%) as well as under-recording of all diagnoses and procedures assessed, except "ectopic pregnancy".

Conclusion: Better recording of diagnoses and procedures on SIH/SUS is essential for its use in maternal morbidity surveillance.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊