护士对不良事件的风险认知及其影响因素:一项横断面研究

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/00469580241263876
Longti Li, Chunqi Ai, Menghe Wang, Xiong Chen
{"title":"护士对不良事件的风险认知及其影响因素:一项横断面研究","authors":"Longti Li, Chunqi Ai, Menghe Wang, Xiong Chen","doi":"10.1177/00469580241263876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate clinical nurses' perception of adverse event risk and to analyze its influencing factors. A proportional stratified random sampling method was applied to recruit nurses from a hospital in Shiyan City, Hubei Province, China. The Nursing Adverse Event Risk Perception Scale, Organizational Support Questionnaire, Nurse Manager Leadership Behavior Questionnaire, Nursing Safety Behavior Questionnaire, and Burnout scale was used to investigate 1084 nurses. Univariate analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis were used to analyze the influencing factors. The scores of the Nurses' Risk Perception of Adverse Nursing Event Scale, Organizational Support Questionnaire, Nurse Manager Leadership Behavior Questionnaire, Nursing Safety Behavior Questionnaire, and Burnout Scale were 14.98 ± 5.39, 52.57 ± 10.00, 88.98 ± 21.08, 56.42 ± 5.03, 30.90 ± 21.49, respectively. According to the correlation analysis, nurses' perception of adverse nursing events was positively correlated with the sense of organizational support (r = .457, <i>P</i> < .01), head nurses' leadership behavior (r = .348, <i>P</i> < .01), and nurse safety behavior (r = .457, <i>P</i> < .01), and negatively correlated with the level of burnout (r = -.384, <i>P</i> < .01). According to the Regression analysis, nurses' departments (β = .226, <i>P</i> < .001), daily working hours (β = 1.122, <i>P</i> < .001), adverse events experience (β = -1.505, <i>P</i> < .001), organizational support (β = .105, <i>P</i> < .001), head nurses' leadership behavior (β = .072, <i>P</i> < .001), and burnout (β = -.052, <i>P</i> < .001) held an influence on nurses' risk perception of adverse nursing event. These factors explained 42.5% of the total variation. Nurses' risk perception of adverse nursing events needs to be improved. Nursing managers need to strengthen organizational support for nurses, change the leadership behavior of nurse managers, reduce nurses' burnout, improve nurses' risk perception of adverse nursing events, prevent adverse events, and ensure patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"61 ","pages":"469580241263876"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11292694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses' Risk Perception of Adverse Events and Its Influencing Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Longti Li, Chunqi Ai, Menghe Wang, Xiong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00469580241263876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To investigate clinical nurses' perception of adverse event risk and to analyze its influencing factors. A proportional stratified random sampling method was applied to recruit nurses from a hospital in Shiyan City, Hubei Province, China. The Nursing Adverse Event Risk Perception Scale, Organizational Support Questionnaire, Nurse Manager Leadership Behavior Questionnaire, Nursing Safety Behavior Questionnaire, and Burnout scale was used to investigate 1084 nurses. Univariate analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis were used to analyze the influencing factors. The scores of the Nurses' Risk Perception of Adverse Nursing Event Scale, Organizational Support Questionnaire, Nurse Manager Leadership Behavior Questionnaire, Nursing Safety Behavior Questionnaire, and Burnout Scale were 14.98 ± 5.39, 52.57 ± 10.00, 88.98 ± 21.08, 56.42 ± 5.03, 30.90 ± 21.49, respectively. According to the correlation analysis, nurses' perception of adverse nursing events was positively correlated with the sense of organizational support (r = .457, <i>P</i> < .01), head nurses' leadership behavior (r = .348, <i>P</i> < .01), and nurse safety behavior (r = .457, <i>P</i> < .01), and negatively correlated with the level of burnout (r = -.384, <i>P</i> < .01). According to the Regression analysis, nurses' departments (β = .226, <i>P</i> < .001), daily working hours (β = 1.122, <i>P</i> < .001), adverse events experience (β = -1.505, <i>P</i> < .001), organizational support (β = .105, <i>P</i> < .001), head nurses' leadership behavior (β = .072, <i>P</i> < .001), and burnout (β = -.052, <i>P</i> < .001) held an influence on nurses' risk perception of adverse nursing event. These factors explained 42.5% of the total variation. Nurses' risk perception of adverse nursing events needs to be improved. Nursing managers need to strengthen organizational support for nurses, change the leadership behavior of nurse managers, reduce nurses' burnout, improve nurses' risk perception of adverse nursing events, prevent adverse events, and ensure patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"469580241263876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11292694/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580241263876\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580241263876","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

调查临床护士对不良事件风险的认知并分析其影响因素。方法采用比例分层随机抽样法,在湖北省十堰市某医院招募护士。采用护理不良事件风险认知量表、组织支持问卷、护士长领导行为问卷、护理安全行为问卷和职业倦怠量表对 1084 名护士进行了调查。采用单变量分析、皮尔逊相关分析和多元线性回归分析对影响因素进行分析。结果护士不良护理事件风险认知量表、组织支持问卷、护士长领导行为问卷、护理安全行为问卷、职业倦怠量表的得分分别为(14.98±5.39)分、(52.57±10.00)分、(88.98±21.08)分、(56.42±5.03)分、(30.90±21.49)分。根据相关分析,护士对护理不良事件的感知与组织支持感呈正相关(r = .457,P P P P P P P P P P P P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nurses' Risk Perception of Adverse Events and Its Influencing Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study.

To investigate clinical nurses' perception of adverse event risk and to analyze its influencing factors. A proportional stratified random sampling method was applied to recruit nurses from a hospital in Shiyan City, Hubei Province, China. The Nursing Adverse Event Risk Perception Scale, Organizational Support Questionnaire, Nurse Manager Leadership Behavior Questionnaire, Nursing Safety Behavior Questionnaire, and Burnout scale was used to investigate 1084 nurses. Univariate analysis, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis were used to analyze the influencing factors. The scores of the Nurses' Risk Perception of Adverse Nursing Event Scale, Organizational Support Questionnaire, Nurse Manager Leadership Behavior Questionnaire, Nursing Safety Behavior Questionnaire, and Burnout Scale were 14.98 ± 5.39, 52.57 ± 10.00, 88.98 ± 21.08, 56.42 ± 5.03, 30.90 ± 21.49, respectively. According to the correlation analysis, nurses' perception of adverse nursing events was positively correlated with the sense of organizational support (r = .457, P < .01), head nurses' leadership behavior (r = .348, P < .01), and nurse safety behavior (r = .457, P < .01), and negatively correlated with the level of burnout (r = -.384, P < .01). According to the Regression analysis, nurses' departments (β = .226, P < .001), daily working hours (β = 1.122, P < .001), adverse events experience (β = -1.505, P < .001), organizational support (β = .105, P < .001), head nurses' leadership behavior (β = .072, P < .001), and burnout (β = -.052, P < .001) held an influence on nurses' risk perception of adverse nursing event. These factors explained 42.5% of the total variation. Nurses' risk perception of adverse nursing events needs to be improved. Nursing managers need to strengthen organizational support for nurses, change the leadership behavior of nurse managers, reduce nurses' burnout, improve nurses' risk perception of adverse nursing events, prevent adverse events, and ensure patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Patient Autonomy in Medical Education: Navigating Ethical Challenges in the Age of Artificial Intelligence Developing the First Digital Occupational Therapy Dictionary Worldwide: A Promising Mobile Application Model for Occupational Therapy Service Providers and Recipients Highlighting the Neuropsychological Consequences of COVID-19: Evidence From a Narrative Review Adverse Drug Reactions Resulting From the Use of Chiral Medicines Amoxicillin, Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Acid, and Ceftriaxone: A Mixed Prospective-Retrospective Cohort Study Social Determinants Influencing the Non-Adoption of Norms Favorable to the Prevention and Control of Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1