澳大利亚创伤性脑损伤倡议:中度-严重创伤性脑损伤患者疗效相关临床因素的系统性回顾。

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurotrauma reports Pub Date : 2024-07-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/neur.2023.0111
Ancelin McKimmie, Jemma Keeves, Adelle Gadowski, Matthew K Bagg, Ana Antonic-Baker, Amelia J Hicks, Regina Hill, Nyssa Clarke, Andrew Holland, Bill Veitch, Daniel Fatovich, Sandy Reeder, Lorena Romero, Jennie L Ponsford, Natasha A Lannin, Terence J O'Brien, D Jamie Cooper, Nick Rushworth, Melinda Fitzgerald, Belinda J Gabbe, Peter A Cameron
{"title":"澳大利亚创伤性脑损伤倡议:中度-严重创伤性脑损伤患者疗效相关临床因素的系统性回顾。","authors":"Ancelin McKimmie, Jemma Keeves, Adelle Gadowski, Matthew K Bagg, Ana Antonic-Baker, Amelia J Hicks, Regina Hill, Nyssa Clarke, Andrew Holland, Bill Veitch, Daniel Fatovich, Sandy Reeder, Lorena Romero, Jennie L Ponsford, Natasha A Lannin, Terence J O'Brien, D Jamie Cooper, Nick Rushworth, Melinda Fitzgerald, Belinda J Gabbe, Peter A Cameron","doi":"10.1089/neur.2023.0111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative (AUS-TBI) is to design a data dictionary to inform data collection and facilitate prediction of outcomes for moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) across Australia. The process has engaged diverse stakeholders across six areas: social, health, clinical, biological, acute interventions, and long-term outcomes. Here, we report the results of the clinical review. Standardized searches were implemented across databases to April 2022. English-language reports of studies evaluating an association between a clinical factor and any clinical outcome in at least 100 patients with moderate-severe TBI were included. Abstracts, and full-text records, were independently screened by at least two reviewers in Covidence. The findings were assessed through a consensus process to determine inclusion in the AUS-TBI data resource. The searches retrieved 22,441 records, of which 1137 were screened at full text and 313 papers were included. The clinical outcomes identified were predominantly measures of survival and disability. The clinical predictors most frequently associated with these outcomes were the Glasgow Coma Scale, pupil reactivity, and blood pressure measures. Following discussion with an expert consensus group, 15 were recommended for inclusion in the data dictionary. This review identified numerous studies evaluating associations between clinical factors and outcomes in patients with moderate-severe TBI. A small number of factors were reported consistently, however, how and when these factors were assessed varied. The findings of this review and the subsequent consensus process have informed the development of an evidence-informed data dictionary for moderate-severe TBI in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":74300,"journal":{"name":"Neurotrauma reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11286001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative: Systematic Review of Clinical Factors Associated with Outcomes in People with Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Ancelin McKimmie, Jemma Keeves, Adelle Gadowski, Matthew K Bagg, Ana Antonic-Baker, Amelia J Hicks, Regina Hill, Nyssa Clarke, Andrew Holland, Bill Veitch, Daniel Fatovich, Sandy Reeder, Lorena Romero, Jennie L Ponsford, Natasha A Lannin, Terence J O'Brien, D Jamie Cooper, Nick Rushworth, Melinda Fitzgerald, Belinda J Gabbe, Peter A Cameron\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/neur.2023.0111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of the Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative (AUS-TBI) is to design a data dictionary to inform data collection and facilitate prediction of outcomes for moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) across Australia. The process has engaged diverse stakeholders across six areas: social, health, clinical, biological, acute interventions, and long-term outcomes. Here, we report the results of the clinical review. Standardized searches were implemented across databases to April 2022. English-language reports of studies evaluating an association between a clinical factor and any clinical outcome in at least 100 patients with moderate-severe TBI were included. Abstracts, and full-text records, were independently screened by at least two reviewers in Covidence. The findings were assessed through a consensus process to determine inclusion in the AUS-TBI data resource. The searches retrieved 22,441 records, of which 1137 were screened at full text and 313 papers were included. The clinical outcomes identified were predominantly measures of survival and disability. The clinical predictors most frequently associated with these outcomes were the Glasgow Coma Scale, pupil reactivity, and blood pressure measures. Following discussion with an expert consensus group, 15 were recommended for inclusion in the data dictionary. This review identified numerous studies evaluating associations between clinical factors and outcomes in patients with moderate-severe TBI. A small number of factors were reported consistently, however, how and when these factors were assessed varied. The findings of this review and the subsequent consensus process have informed the development of an evidence-informed data dictionary for moderate-severe TBI in Australia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurotrauma reports\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11286001/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurotrauma reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2023.0111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurotrauma reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neur.2023.0111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

澳大利亚创伤性脑损伤倡议(AUS-TBI)的目的是设计一个数据字典,为数据收集提供信息,并促进对澳大利亚中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)结果的预测。这一过程涉及社会、健康、临床、生物、急性干预和长期结果等六个领域的不同利益相关者。在此,我们报告临床审查的结果。截至 2022 年 4 月,我们对所有数据库进行了标准化检索。我们纳入了对至少 100 名中度严重创伤性脑损伤患者的临床因素与任何临床结果之间的关联性进行评估的研究的英文报告。摘要和全文记录由 Covidence 中至少两名审稿人独立筛选。研究结果通过共识程序进行评估,以决定是否纳入 AUS-TBI 数据资源。搜索共检索到 22,441 条记录,其中 1137 条经过全文筛选,313 篇论文被纳入其中。确定的临床结果主要是生存率和残疾度量。最常与这些结果相关的临床预测因子是格拉斯哥昏迷量表、瞳孔反应性和血压测量。在与专家共识小组讨论后,有 15 篇被推荐纳入数据字典。本综述发现了许多评估中度-重度创伤性脑损伤患者临床因素与预后之间关系的研究。少数因素得到了一致的报告,但这些因素的评估方式和时间各不相同。本次综述的结果以及随后的共识过程为澳大利亚中度严重创伤性脑损伤循证数据字典的开发提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative: Systematic Review of Clinical Factors Associated with Outcomes in People with Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

The aim of the Australian Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative (AUS-TBI) is to design a data dictionary to inform data collection and facilitate prediction of outcomes for moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) across Australia. The process has engaged diverse stakeholders across six areas: social, health, clinical, biological, acute interventions, and long-term outcomes. Here, we report the results of the clinical review. Standardized searches were implemented across databases to April 2022. English-language reports of studies evaluating an association between a clinical factor and any clinical outcome in at least 100 patients with moderate-severe TBI were included. Abstracts, and full-text records, were independently screened by at least two reviewers in Covidence. The findings were assessed through a consensus process to determine inclusion in the AUS-TBI data resource. The searches retrieved 22,441 records, of which 1137 were screened at full text and 313 papers were included. The clinical outcomes identified were predominantly measures of survival and disability. The clinical predictors most frequently associated with these outcomes were the Glasgow Coma Scale, pupil reactivity, and blood pressure measures. Following discussion with an expert consensus group, 15 were recommended for inclusion in the data dictionary. This review identified numerous studies evaluating associations between clinical factors and outcomes in patients with moderate-severe TBI. A small number of factors were reported consistently, however, how and when these factors were assessed varied. The findings of this review and the subsequent consensus process have informed the development of an evidence-informed data dictionary for moderate-severe TBI in Australia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Small Molecule Drug C381 Attenuates Brain Vascular Damage Following Repetitive Mild Traumatic Injury. Clinical Impact of an AI Decision Support System for Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage in CT Scans. Metacognitive Therapy for People Experiencing Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Preliminary Multiple Case-Series Study. Multicenter Study Examining Temporal Trends in Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Over Six Years Using Joinpoint Regression. Resilience and Concussion Recovery in Minority Women: Promoting Health Equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1