COVID-19 大流行病的方方面面:"隐形 "医务工作者常见精神障碍的发病率及其与职业压力的关系。

Manuela Matos Maturino, Camila Carvalho de Sousa, Lusicleide Galindo da Silva Moraes, Danyella Santana Souza, Maria Yaná Guimarães Silva Freitas, Tânia Maria de Araújo
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行病的方方面面:\"隐形 \"医务工作者常见精神障碍的发病率及其与职业压力的关系。","authors":"Manuela Matos Maturino, Camila Carvalho de Sousa, Lusicleide Galindo da Silva Moraes, Danyella Santana Souza, Maria Yaná Guimarães Silva Freitas, Tânia Maria de Araújo","doi":"10.1590/1980-549720240039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between occupational stressors and common mental disorders (CMD) among \"invisible\" health workers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional study including a probabilistic sample of 1,014 health workers from three municipalities in Bahia. CMDs were assessed using the SRQ-20. The Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) scale and the Demand-Control Model assessed occupational stressors. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple analysis to evaluate the association between the variables of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The global prevalence of CMD was 39.9%; it was higher among CHA/EDCA (47.2%), followed by management and surveillance staff (38.6%), technicians (35.4%), and support/maintenance/cleaning staff (29.9%). The association between occupational stressors and CMD varied among occupations: 1. Excessive work commitment (EWC), effort-reward imbalance (ERI), and psychological demand were associated with CMD among support/maintenance/cleaning workers; 2. EWC and ERI were associated with CMD among CHA/EDCA; 3. EWC, ERI, and low control over work were associated with CMD among technicians; 4. Among management and surveillance workers, only ERI remained associated with CMD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Occupational stressors played a relevant role in mental illness, with variation between occupational strata, demanding attention, monitoring, and control.</p>","PeriodicalId":74697,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology","volume":"27 ","pages":"e240039"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dimensions of the COVID-19 pandemic: prevalence of common mental disorders in \\\"invisible\\\" health workers and their association with occupational stressors.\",\"authors\":\"Manuela Matos Maturino, Camila Carvalho de Sousa, Lusicleide Galindo da Silva Moraes, Danyella Santana Souza, Maria Yaná Guimarães Silva Freitas, Tânia Maria de Araújo\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1980-549720240039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between occupational stressors and common mental disorders (CMD) among \\\"invisible\\\" health workers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional study including a probabilistic sample of 1,014 health workers from three municipalities in Bahia. CMDs were assessed using the SRQ-20. The Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) scale and the Demand-Control Model assessed occupational stressors. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple analysis to evaluate the association between the variables of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The global prevalence of CMD was 39.9%; it was higher among CHA/EDCA (47.2%), followed by management and surveillance staff (38.6%), technicians (35.4%), and support/maintenance/cleaning staff (29.9%). The association between occupational stressors and CMD varied among occupations: 1. Excessive work commitment (EWC), effort-reward imbalance (ERI), and psychological demand were associated with CMD among support/maintenance/cleaning workers; 2. EWC and ERI were associated with CMD among CHA/EDCA; 3. EWC, ERI, and low control over work were associated with CMD among technicians; 4. Among management and surveillance workers, only ERI remained associated with CMD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Occupational stressors played a relevant role in mental illness, with variation between occupational strata, demanding attention, monitoring, and control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"e240039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290769/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720240039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720240039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下,评估 "隐形 "医务工作者的职业压力与常见精神障碍(CMD)之间的关联:横断面研究,包括来自巴伊亚州三个城市的 1 014 名医务工作者的概率样本。使用 SRQ-20 对 CMDs 进行评估。努力-回报不平衡(ERI)量表和需求-控制模型评估了职业压力源。通过描述性分析、双变量分析和多重分析来评估相关变量之间的关联:CMD的总体患病率为39.9%,其中CHA/EDCA的患病率较高(47.2%),其次是管理和监控人员(38.6%)、技术人员(35.4%)以及支持/维护/清洁人员(29.9%)。职业压力因素与慢性阻塞性肺病之间的关系因职业而异:1.在辅助/维护/清洁人员中,过度工作承诺(EWC)、努力-回报不平衡(ERI)和心理需求与慢性阻塞性肺病有关;2.在CHA/EDCA中,EWC和ERI与慢性阻塞性肺病有关;3.在技术人员中,EWC、ERI和对工作的控制力低与慢性阻塞性肺病有关;4.在管理和监控人员中,只有ERI仍与慢性阻塞性肺病有关:结论:职业压力因素在精神疾病中扮演着重要角色,不同职业阶层之间存在差异,需要关注、监测和控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dimensions of the COVID-19 pandemic: prevalence of common mental disorders in "invisible" health workers and their association with occupational stressors.

Objective: To evaluate the association between occupational stressors and common mental disorders (CMD) among "invisible" health workers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Method: Cross-sectional study including a probabilistic sample of 1,014 health workers from three municipalities in Bahia. CMDs were assessed using the SRQ-20. The Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) scale and the Demand-Control Model assessed occupational stressors. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple analysis to evaluate the association between the variables of interest.

Results: The global prevalence of CMD was 39.9%; it was higher among CHA/EDCA (47.2%), followed by management and surveillance staff (38.6%), technicians (35.4%), and support/maintenance/cleaning staff (29.9%). The association between occupational stressors and CMD varied among occupations: 1. Excessive work commitment (EWC), effort-reward imbalance (ERI), and psychological demand were associated with CMD among support/maintenance/cleaning workers; 2. EWC and ERI were associated with CMD among CHA/EDCA; 3. EWC, ERI, and low control over work were associated with CMD among technicians; 4. Among management and surveillance workers, only ERI remained associated with CMD.

Conclusions: Occupational stressors played a relevant role in mental illness, with variation between occupational strata, demanding attention, monitoring, and control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum. Socio-occupational conditions and health of fishers exposed to the oil disaster-crime in Pernambuco, Brazil. Places to purchase food in urban and rural areas of Brazil. Erratum. Erratum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1