韩国脱发严重程度分类共识标准》。

Yong Hyun Jang, Seung Soo Lee, Do Young Park, Young Lee, Do-Young Kim, Hyunsun Park, Hyun-Tae Shin, Jung Eun Kim, Kihyuk Shin, Ji Hae Lee, Jee Woong Choi, Byung Choel Park, Beom Joon Kim, Soo Hong Seo, Chong Hyun Won, Jin Park, Min Sung Kim, Sang Seok Kim, Bark-Lynn Lew, Chang-Hun Huh, Ohsang Kwon, Yang Won Lee, Moon-Bum Kim
{"title":"韩国脱发严重程度分类共识标准》。","authors":"Yong Hyun Jang, Seung Soo Lee, Do Young Park, Young Lee, Do-Young Kim, Hyunsun Park, Hyun-Tae Shin, Jung Eun Kim, Kihyuk Shin, Ji Hae Lee, Jee Woong Choi, Byung Choel Park, Beom Joon Kim, Soo Hong Seo, Chong Hyun Won, Jin Park, Min Sung Kim, Sang Seok Kim, Bark-Lynn Lew, Chang-Hun Huh, Ohsang Kwon, Yang Won Lee, Moon-Bum Kim","doi":"10.5021/ad.24.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A set of criteria for severity classification is essential in alopecia areata (AA). Currently, no guidelines are universally accepted for defining AA severity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to establish a set of consensus criteria for classifying the severity of and identifying treatment refractoriness in AA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A preliminary draft of the definition for moderate-to-severe AA was crafted based on available evidence, and members of the Korean Hair Research Society (KHRS) subsequently endorsed the recommendation through an online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first Delphi round, consensus was attained on 15 questions. After refining certain items in the second round, consensus was achieved on 23 out of 26 questions. The KHRS first defined AA severity using the severity of alopecia tool (SALT). SALT ≥50 was defined as severe, 20≤ SALT <50 as moderate, and SALT <20 as mild. Moderate AA was considered severe if it meets one or more of the following criteria: dermatology life quality index >10, presence of accompanying eyebrow or eyelash loss, positive hair loss activity, or treatment-refractory AA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These consensus criteria can help clinicians accurately diagnose AA, provide appropriate treatment, and monitor its progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":94298,"journal":{"name":"Annals of dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11291096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Korean Consensus Criteria for the Severity Classification of Alopecia Areata.\",\"authors\":\"Yong Hyun Jang, Seung Soo Lee, Do Young Park, Young Lee, Do-Young Kim, Hyunsun Park, Hyun-Tae Shin, Jung Eun Kim, Kihyuk Shin, Ji Hae Lee, Jee Woong Choi, Byung Choel Park, Beom Joon Kim, Soo Hong Seo, Chong Hyun Won, Jin Park, Min Sung Kim, Sang Seok Kim, Bark-Lynn Lew, Chang-Hun Huh, Ohsang Kwon, Yang Won Lee, Moon-Bum Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.5021/ad.24.058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A set of criteria for severity classification is essential in alopecia areata (AA). Currently, no guidelines are universally accepted for defining AA severity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to establish a set of consensus criteria for classifying the severity of and identifying treatment refractoriness in AA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A preliminary draft of the definition for moderate-to-severe AA was crafted based on available evidence, and members of the Korean Hair Research Society (KHRS) subsequently endorsed the recommendation through an online survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first Delphi round, consensus was attained on 15 questions. After refining certain items in the second round, consensus was achieved on 23 out of 26 questions. The KHRS first defined AA severity using the severity of alopecia tool (SALT). SALT ≥50 was defined as severe, 20≤ SALT <50 as moderate, and SALT <20 as mild. Moderate AA was considered severe if it meets one or more of the following criteria: dermatology life quality index >10, presence of accompanying eyebrow or eyelash loss, positive hair loss activity, or treatment-refractory AA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These consensus criteria can help clinicians accurately diagnose AA, provide appropriate treatment, and monitor its progression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of dermatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11291096/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.24.058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.24.058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对于斑秃(AA)而言,一套严重程度分类标准至关重要。目前,还没有公认的准则来定义 AA 的严重程度:本研究旨在建立一套共识标准,用于对 AA 的严重程度进行分类并确定治疗难治性:方法:根据现有证据起草了中重度 AA 的定义初稿,韩国毛发研究学会(KHRS)成员随后通过在线调查认可了该建议:结果:在第一轮德尔菲讨论中,就 15 个问题达成了共识。在第二轮对某些问题进行改进后,26 个问题中有 23 个达成了共识。KHRS 首先使用脱发严重程度工具(SALT)来定义 AA 的严重程度。SALT≥50定义为严重,20≤SALT 10、伴有眉毛或睫毛脱落、脱发活动阳性或治疗难治性AA:这些共识标准可帮助临床医生准确诊断 AA,提供适当的治疗并监测其进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Korean Consensus Criteria for the Severity Classification of Alopecia Areata.

Background: A set of criteria for severity classification is essential in alopecia areata (AA). Currently, no guidelines are universally accepted for defining AA severity.

Objective: This study aimed to establish a set of consensus criteria for classifying the severity of and identifying treatment refractoriness in AA.

Methods: A preliminary draft of the definition for moderate-to-severe AA was crafted based on available evidence, and members of the Korean Hair Research Society (KHRS) subsequently endorsed the recommendation through an online survey.

Results: In the first Delphi round, consensus was attained on 15 questions. After refining certain items in the second round, consensus was achieved on 23 out of 26 questions. The KHRS first defined AA severity using the severity of alopecia tool (SALT). SALT ≥50 was defined as severe, 20≤ SALT <50 as moderate, and SALT <20 as mild. Moderate AA was considered severe if it meets one or more of the following criteria: dermatology life quality index >10, presence of accompanying eyebrow or eyelash loss, positive hair loss activity, or treatment-refractory AA.

Conclusion: These consensus criteria can help clinicians accurately diagnose AA, provide appropriate treatment, and monitor its progression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Randomized, Split-Face, Comparative Study of a Combined Needle Radiofrequency/Intense Pulsed Light Device in Moderate-to-Severe Acne Patients. Clinical Differential Diagnosis of Poroma and Poroma Mimicker: Retrospective, Multi-Center Study in Korea. Dickkopf-related Protein 2 Promotes Hair Growth by Upregulating the Wnt/β-catenin Signaling Pathway in Human Dermal Papilla Cells. Exploring the Interplay: Obesity, Lipid Metabolism, and Clinical Manifestations in Atopic Dermatitis. Plasma Metabolomics Indicates Potential Biomarkers and Abnormal Metabolic Pathways in Female Melasma Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1