无创脑部刺激的知识领域和新兴趋势:通过 CiteSpace 进行文献计量分析。

Inmaculada Ruiz-López, Desirée Victoria-Montesinos, Juan Martínez-Fuentes
{"title":"无创脑部刺激的知识领域和新兴趋势:通过 CiteSpace 进行文献计量分析。","authors":"Inmaculada Ruiz-López, Desirée Victoria-Montesinos, Juan Martínez-Fuentes","doi":"10.7705/biomedica.7040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent decades, new non-invasive brain stimulation techniques and protocols have been developed, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and visualize the intellectual structure of non-invasive brain stimulation through document co-citation analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed 30,854 Web of Science-indexed manuscripts and their 1,615,692 references regarding non-invasive brain stimulation, all published from 1988 to 2022. We drew a document co-citation network map using CiteSpace software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most productive journal was Clinical Neurophysiology. The most published institution was the University College London, and the country with the most reports was the USA. The most productive author was Alvaro Pascual-Leone and the most cited author in the non-invasive brain stimulation field was J. C. Rothwell. In addition, the most cited study was that of Rossi et al. (2009). The safe application of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques and their effects on motor or executive functions is an emerging trend in this research area.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current investigation displayed a quantitative scientometric approach and delved into the advancement of non-invasive brain stimulation research by examining the references published in this domain. These findings can be valuable for professionals to picture the patterns of recognition and emerging directions in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":101322,"journal":{"name":"Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud","volume":"44 Sp. 1","pages":"139-150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418831/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge domains and emerging trends in non-invasive brain stimulation: A bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace\",\"authors\":\"Inmaculada Ruiz-López, Desirée Victoria-Montesinos, Juan Martínez-Fuentes\",\"doi\":\"10.7705/biomedica.7040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent decades, new non-invasive brain stimulation techniques and protocols have been developed, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify and visualize the intellectual structure of non-invasive brain stimulation through document co-citation analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We analyzed 30,854 Web of Science-indexed manuscripts and their 1,615,692 references regarding non-invasive brain stimulation, all published from 1988 to 2022. We drew a document co-citation network map using CiteSpace software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most productive journal was Clinical Neurophysiology. The most published institution was the University College London, and the country with the most reports was the USA. The most productive author was Alvaro Pascual-Leone and the most cited author in the non-invasive brain stimulation field was J. C. Rothwell. In addition, the most cited study was that of Rossi et al. (2009). The safe application of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques and their effects on motor or executive functions is an emerging trend in this research area.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current investigation displayed a quantitative scientometric approach and delved into the advancement of non-invasive brain stimulation research by examining the references published in this domain. These findings can be valuable for professionals to picture the patterns of recognition and emerging directions in the field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud\",\"volume\":\"44 Sp. 1\",\"pages\":\"139-150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11418831/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.7040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.7040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:近几十年来,经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激等新的无创脑刺激技术和方案不断发展:近几十年来,经颅磁刺激和经颅直流电刺激等新的非侵入性脑刺激技术和方案不断涌现:材料与方法:我们分析了 30,854 篇 Web of Science 索引的手稿及其 1,615,692 篇有关无创脑部刺激的参考文献,这些文献均发表于 1988 年至 2022 年期间。我们使用 CiteSpace 软件绘制了文献共引网络图:成果最多的期刊是《临床神经生理学》。发表论文最多的机构是伦敦大学学院,发表报告最多的国家是美国。高产作者是 Alvaro Pascual-Leone,在无创脑刺激领域被引用最多的作者是 J. C. Rothwell。此外,被引用最多的研究是 Rossi 等人(2009 年)的研究。非侵入性脑刺激技术的安全应用及其对运动或执行功能的影响是这一研究领域的新兴趋势:目前的调查采用了定量科学计量学方法,通过研究该领域发表的参考文献,深入探讨了无创脑部刺激研究的进展。这些发现对专业人士了解该领域的认知模式和新兴方向很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowledge domains and emerging trends in non-invasive brain stimulation: A bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace

Introduction: In recent decades, new non-invasive brain stimulation techniques and protocols have been developed, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation.

Objective: To identify and visualize the intellectual structure of non-invasive brain stimulation through document co-citation analysis.

Materials and methods: We analyzed 30,854 Web of Science-indexed manuscripts and their 1,615,692 references regarding non-invasive brain stimulation, all published from 1988 to 2022. We drew a document co-citation network map using CiteSpace software.

Results: The most productive journal was Clinical Neurophysiology. The most published institution was the University College London, and the country with the most reports was the USA. The most productive author was Alvaro Pascual-Leone and the most cited author in the non-invasive brain stimulation field was J. C. Rothwell. In addition, the most cited study was that of Rossi et al. (2009). The safe application of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques and their effects on motor or executive functions is an emerging trend in this research area.

Conclusions: The current investigation displayed a quantitative scientometric approach and delved into the advancement of non-invasive brain stimulation research by examining the references published in this domain. These findings can be valuable for professionals to picture the patterns of recognition and emerging directions in the field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Standardization of the use of opsonized zymosan as stimulus in the 1,2,3-dihydrorhodamine technique for the assessment of neutrophil respiratory burst Recommendations on vaccination in children and adolescents with inborn errors of immunity according to the expanded Colombian immunization program A hidden enemy: Understanding the hemophagocytic syndrome in children under five years of age in a high-complexity institution in southwestern Colombia Allelic and haplotypic HLA analysis in patients with psoriatic arthritis: Low frequency of common alleles Autoimmunity against cytokines: Double strike in autoimmune disease, a historical perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1