护理伙伴对科恩-曼斯菲尔德躁动量表行为的评估。

Frontiers in dementia Pub Date : 2024-03-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frdem.2024.1328874
Dorothee Oberdhan, Andrew Palsgrove, Christy Houle, Teya Lovell, A Alex Levine, Terry Frangiosa, Ginny Biggar, Meryl Comer
{"title":"护理伙伴对科恩-曼斯菲尔德躁动量表行为的评估。","authors":"Dorothee Oberdhan, Andrew Palsgrove, Christy Houle, Teya Lovell, A Alex Levine, Terry Frangiosa, Ginny Biggar, Meryl Comer","doi":"10.3389/frdem.2024.1328874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Agitation is a common symptom in patients with Alzheimer's dementia. But agitation can be a heterogeneous symptom, encompassing a diverse array of behaviors exhibited by patients. The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) is a 29-item scale that is used to systematically assess the frequency and severity of agitation in older adults as rated by a primary caregiver. The CMAI was originally designed for use by professional care givers in institutional care settings. Alzheimer's dementia, however, is associated with a significant burden on family members, who provide the majority of care, and other informal care partners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our qualitative study aimed to assess the accuracy and applicability of the CMAI according to the needs and perceptions of non-professional care partners. Specifically, we wanted to determine if the behaviors included in the instrument reflect: (a) the care partner's experience with agitation in Alzheimer's dementia patients, (b) how the behaviors and their frequency are related to the perception of agitation severity, and (c) what changes in agitation behaviors are meaningful to care partners. We interviewed 30 care partners for patients with Alzheimer's dementia in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The care partners confirmed all behaviors listed in the CMAI as relevant. The behaviors reflect a spectrum of severity, with aggressive behaviors considered more severe than non-aggressive behaviors and physical behaviors generally considered more severe than verbal behaviors. Any reduction or increase in the frequency of a behavior was meaningful to care partners. Generally, a change from physical to verbal behaviors and aggressive to non-aggressive was considered a meaningful improvement while a change from verbal to physical and non-aggressive to aggressive was considered a meaningful worsening.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The CMAI appropriately captures relevant behaviors of agitation in Alzheimer's dementia and provides insight into the relative improvement or worsening of agitation symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":520000,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in dementia","volume":"3 ","pages":"1328874"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11285564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care partner evaluation of the behaviors in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory.\",\"authors\":\"Dorothee Oberdhan, Andrew Palsgrove, Christy Houle, Teya Lovell, A Alex Levine, Terry Frangiosa, Ginny Biggar, Meryl Comer\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frdem.2024.1328874\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Agitation is a common symptom in patients with Alzheimer's dementia. But agitation can be a heterogeneous symptom, encompassing a diverse array of behaviors exhibited by patients. The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) is a 29-item scale that is used to systematically assess the frequency and severity of agitation in older adults as rated by a primary caregiver. The CMAI was originally designed for use by professional care givers in institutional care settings. Alzheimer's dementia, however, is associated with a significant burden on family members, who provide the majority of care, and other informal care partners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our qualitative study aimed to assess the accuracy and applicability of the CMAI according to the needs and perceptions of non-professional care partners. Specifically, we wanted to determine if the behaviors included in the instrument reflect: (a) the care partner's experience with agitation in Alzheimer's dementia patients, (b) how the behaviors and their frequency are related to the perception of agitation severity, and (c) what changes in agitation behaviors are meaningful to care partners. We interviewed 30 care partners for patients with Alzheimer's dementia in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The care partners confirmed all behaviors listed in the CMAI as relevant. The behaviors reflect a spectrum of severity, with aggressive behaviors considered more severe than non-aggressive behaviors and physical behaviors generally considered more severe than verbal behaviors. Any reduction or increase in the frequency of a behavior was meaningful to care partners. Generally, a change from physical to verbal behaviors and aggressive to non-aggressive was considered a meaningful improvement while a change from verbal to physical and non-aggressive to aggressive was considered a meaningful worsening.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The CMAI appropriately captures relevant behaviors of agitation in Alzheimer's dementia and provides insight into the relative improvement or worsening of agitation symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in dementia\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"1328874\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11285564/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in dementia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frdem.2024.1328874\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in dementia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frdem.2024.1328874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介躁动是阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆患者的常见症状。但躁动可能是一种异质性症状,包括患者表现出的一系列不同行为。科恩-曼斯菲尔德躁动量表(Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory,CMAI)由 29 个项目组成,用于系统评估老年人躁动的频率和严重程度,并由主要护理人员进行评分。CMAI 最初是为机构护理环境中的专业护理人员设计的。然而,阿尔茨海默氏痴呆症给提供大部分护理的家庭成员和其他非正式护理伙伴带来了沉重的负担:我们的定性研究旨在根据非专业护理伙伴的需求和看法,评估 CMAI 的准确性和适用性。具体来说,我们希望确定该工具中包含的行为是否反映了:(a)护理伙伴对阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆患者躁动的体验;(b)这些行为及其频率与对躁动严重程度的感知有何关系;以及(c)躁动行为的哪些变化对护理伙伴有意义。我们采访了美国 30 位阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆患者的护理伙伴:结果:护理伙伴确认了 CMAI 中列出的所有相关行为。这些行为反映了不同的严重程度,攻击性行为比非攻击性行为更严重,肢体行为通常比言语行为更严重。任何行为频率的减少或增加对护理伙伴来说都是有意义的。一般来说,从肢体行为到言语行为以及攻击性行为到非攻击性行为的变化被认为是有意义的改善,而从言语行为到肢体行为以及非攻击性行为到攻击性行为的变化则被认为是有意义的恶化:讨论:CMAI 适当捕捉了阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆患者的相关躁动行为,并提供了躁动症状相对改善或恶化的洞察力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Care partner evaluation of the behaviors in the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory.

Introduction: Agitation is a common symptom in patients with Alzheimer's dementia. But agitation can be a heterogeneous symptom, encompassing a diverse array of behaviors exhibited by patients. The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) is a 29-item scale that is used to systematically assess the frequency and severity of agitation in older adults as rated by a primary caregiver. The CMAI was originally designed for use by professional care givers in institutional care settings. Alzheimer's dementia, however, is associated with a significant burden on family members, who provide the majority of care, and other informal care partners.

Methods: Our qualitative study aimed to assess the accuracy and applicability of the CMAI according to the needs and perceptions of non-professional care partners. Specifically, we wanted to determine if the behaviors included in the instrument reflect: (a) the care partner's experience with agitation in Alzheimer's dementia patients, (b) how the behaviors and their frequency are related to the perception of agitation severity, and (c) what changes in agitation behaviors are meaningful to care partners. We interviewed 30 care partners for patients with Alzheimer's dementia in the United States.

Results: The care partners confirmed all behaviors listed in the CMAI as relevant. The behaviors reflect a spectrum of severity, with aggressive behaviors considered more severe than non-aggressive behaviors and physical behaviors generally considered more severe than verbal behaviors. Any reduction or increase in the frequency of a behavior was meaningful to care partners. Generally, a change from physical to verbal behaviors and aggressive to non-aggressive was considered a meaningful improvement while a change from verbal to physical and non-aggressive to aggressive was considered a meaningful worsening.

Discussion: The CMAI appropriately captures relevant behaviors of agitation in Alzheimer's dementia and provides insight into the relative improvement or worsening of agitation symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating neuropathological correlates of hyperactive and psychotic symptoms in dementia: a systematic review. Hormone replacement therapy, menopausal age and lifestyle variables are associated with better cognitive performance at follow-up but not cognition over time in older-adult women irrespective of APOE4 carrier status and co-morbidities. "A torch, a rope, a belly laugh": engaging with the multiple voices of support groups for people living with rare dementia. Dementia incidence among a cohort of lebanese older adults: first incidence estimates from the Middle East and North Africa region. Examining the prevention approach in National Dementia Plans from European and North American countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1