Thomas J. Summers, Jesus Diaz Sanchez and David C. Cantu
{"title":"离子与配体的比例对镧系元素配体水溶液与有机物相对溶解度的影响。","authors":"Thomas J. Summers, Jesus Diaz Sanchez and David C. Cantu","doi":"10.1039/D4CP02586E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >In the solvent extraction of rare earth elements, mechanistic aspects remain unclear regarding where and how extractant molecules coordinate metal ions and transport them from the aqueous phase into the organic phase. Molecular dynamics simulations were used to examine how unprotonated di(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid (DEHP<small><sup>−</sup></small>) ligands that coordinate the Gd<small><sup>3+</sup></small> ion can transfer the ion across the water–organic interface. Using the umbrella sampling technique, potential of mean force profiles were constructed to quantify the relative solubility of the Gd<small><sup>3+</sup></small> ion coordinated to 0–3 DEHP<small><sup>−</sup></small> ligands in either water, 1-octanol, or hexane solvents and at the water–organic interfaces. The simulations show the Gd–DEHP<small><sup>−</sup></small> complexes, at varying Ln–ligand ratios, preferentially solvate on water–organic interfaces. While the Gd(DEHP<small><sup>−</sup></small>)<small><sub>3</sub></small> complex will diffuse past the aqueous–organic interface into the octanol solvent, it is thermodynamically preferred for the Gd(DEHP<small><sup>−</sup></small>)<small><sub>3</sub></small> complex to remain in the water–hexane interface when there is no amphiphilic layer of excess ligand.</p>","PeriodicalId":99,"journal":{"name":"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/cp/d4cp02586e?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of ion to ligand ratio on the aqueous to organic relative solubility of a lanthanide–ligand complex†\",\"authors\":\"Thomas J. Summers, Jesus Diaz Sanchez and David C. Cantu\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D4CP02586E\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >In the solvent extraction of rare earth elements, mechanistic aspects remain unclear regarding where and how extractant molecules coordinate metal ions and transport them from the aqueous phase into the organic phase. Molecular dynamics simulations were used to examine how unprotonated di(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid (DEHP<small><sup>−</sup></small>) ligands that coordinate the Gd<small><sup>3+</sup></small> ion can transfer the ion across the water–organic interface. Using the umbrella sampling technique, potential of mean force profiles were constructed to quantify the relative solubility of the Gd<small><sup>3+</sup></small> ion coordinated to 0–3 DEHP<small><sup>−</sup></small> ligands in either water, 1-octanol, or hexane solvents and at the water–organic interfaces. The simulations show the Gd–DEHP<small><sup>−</sup></small> complexes, at varying Ln–ligand ratios, preferentially solvate on water–organic interfaces. While the Gd(DEHP<small><sup>−</sup></small>)<small><sub>3</sub></small> complex will diffuse past the aqueous–organic interface into the octanol solvent, it is thermodynamically preferred for the Gd(DEHP<small><sup>−</sup></small>)<small><sub>3</sub></small> complex to remain in the water–hexane interface when there is no amphiphilic layer of excess ligand.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":99,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/cp/d4cp02586e?page=search\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/cp/d4cp02586e\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/cp/d4cp02586e","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of ion to ligand ratio on the aqueous to organic relative solubility of a lanthanide–ligand complex†
In the solvent extraction of rare earth elements, mechanistic aspects remain unclear regarding where and how extractant molecules coordinate metal ions and transport them from the aqueous phase into the organic phase. Molecular dynamics simulations were used to examine how unprotonated di(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid (DEHP−) ligands that coordinate the Gd3+ ion can transfer the ion across the water–organic interface. Using the umbrella sampling technique, potential of mean force profiles were constructed to quantify the relative solubility of the Gd3+ ion coordinated to 0–3 DEHP− ligands in either water, 1-octanol, or hexane solvents and at the water–organic interfaces. The simulations show the Gd–DEHP− complexes, at varying Ln–ligand ratios, preferentially solvate on water–organic interfaces. While the Gd(DEHP−)3 complex will diffuse past the aqueous–organic interface into the octanol solvent, it is thermodynamically preferred for the Gd(DEHP−)3 complex to remain in the water–hexane interface when there is no amphiphilic layer of excess ligand.
期刊介绍:
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (PCCP) is an international journal co-owned by 19 physical chemistry and physics societies from around the world. This journal publishes original, cutting-edge research in physical chemistry, chemical physics and biophysical chemistry. To be suitable for publication in PCCP, articles must include significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry; this is the most important criterion that reviewers and Editors will judge against when evaluating submissions.
The journal has a broad scope and welcomes contributions spanning experiment, theory, computation and data science. Topical coverage includes spectroscopy, dynamics, kinetics, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, electrochemistry, catalysis, surface science, quantum mechanics, quantum computing and machine learning. Interdisciplinary research areas such as polymers and soft matter, materials, nanoscience, energy, surfaces/interfaces, and biophysical chemistry are welcomed if they demonstrate significant innovation and/or insight into physical chemistry. Joined experimental/theoretical studies are particularly appreciated when complementary and based on up-to-date approaches.