Arturo Casadevall, Scott McConnell, Daniele Focosi
{"title":"开发针对 COVID-19 新病毒变异的单克隆抗体的考虑因素。","authors":"Arturo Casadevall, Scott McConnell, Daniele Focosi","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2388186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies proved safe and effective in preventing progression of COVID-19 to hospitalization, but most were eventually defeated by continued viral evolution. mAb combinations and those mAbs that were deliberatively selected to target conserved regions of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein proved more resilient to viral escape variants as evident by longer clinical useful lives.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We searched PubMed for literature covering the need, development, and use of mAb therapies for COVID-19. As much of humanity now has immunity to SARS-CoV-2, the population at most risk is that of immunocompromised individuals. Hence, there continues to be a need for mAb therapies for immunocompromised patients. However, mAb use in this population carries the risk for selecting mAb-resistant variants, which could pose a public health concern if they disseminate to the general population.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Going forward, structural knowledge of the interactions of Spike with its cellular receptor has identified several regions that may be good targets for future mAb therapeutics. A focus on designing variant-resistant mAbs together with cocktails that target several epitopes and the use of other variant mitigating strategies such as the concomitant use of small molecule antivirals and polyclonal preparations could extend the clinical usefulness of future preparations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"787-797"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Considerations for the development of monoclonal antibodies to address new viral variants in COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Arturo Casadevall, Scott McConnell, Daniele Focosi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14712598.2024.2388186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies proved safe and effective in preventing progression of COVID-19 to hospitalization, but most were eventually defeated by continued viral evolution. mAb combinations and those mAbs that were deliberatively selected to target conserved regions of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein proved more resilient to viral escape variants as evident by longer clinical useful lives.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We searched PubMed for literature covering the need, development, and use of mAb therapies for COVID-19. As much of humanity now has immunity to SARS-CoV-2, the population at most risk is that of immunocompromised individuals. Hence, there continues to be a need for mAb therapies for immunocompromised patients. However, mAb use in this population carries the risk for selecting mAb-resistant variants, which could pose a public health concern if they disseminate to the general population.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Going forward, structural knowledge of the interactions of Spike with its cellular receptor has identified several regions that may be good targets for future mAb therapeutics. A focus on designing variant-resistant mAbs together with cocktails that target several epitopes and the use of other variant mitigating strategies such as the concomitant use of small molecule antivirals and polyclonal preparations could extend the clinical usefulness of future preparations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"787-797\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2024.2388186\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2024.2388186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:单克隆抗体(mAb)疗法在预防COVID-19进展为住院治疗方面被证明是安全有效的,但大多数疗法最终都被持续的病毒进化所击败。mAb组合以及那些特意选择靶向SARS-CoV-2尖峰蛋白保守区域的mAb被证明对病毒逃逸变异具有更强的抵抗力,这一点从其更长的临床使用寿命中可以看出:我们在PubMed上搜索了有关COVID-19 mAb疗法的需求、开发和使用的文献。由于现在人类中的大多数人都对 SARS-CoV-2 具有免疫力,因此面临最大风险的人群是免疫力低下的人。因此,免疫力低下的患者仍然需要 mAb 疗法。然而,在这一人群中使用 mAb 有可能会产生耐 mAb 变异株,如果这些变异株扩散到普通人群中,就会引发公共卫生问题:展望未来,有关 Spike 与其细胞受体相互作用的结构知识已经确定了几个区域,这些区域可能是未来 mAb 疗法的良好靶点。重点设计抗变异的 mAb 以及针对多个表位的鸡尾酒,并使用其他减轻变异的策略,如同时使用小分子抗病毒药物和多克隆制剂,可以扩大未来制剂的临床用途。
Considerations for the development of monoclonal antibodies to address new viral variants in COVID-19.
Introduction: Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies proved safe and effective in preventing progression of COVID-19 to hospitalization, but most were eventually defeated by continued viral evolution. mAb combinations and those mAbs that were deliberatively selected to target conserved regions of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein proved more resilient to viral escape variants as evident by longer clinical useful lives.
Areas covered: We searched PubMed for literature covering the need, development, and use of mAb therapies for COVID-19. As much of humanity now has immunity to SARS-CoV-2, the population at most risk is that of immunocompromised individuals. Hence, there continues to be a need for mAb therapies for immunocompromised patients. However, mAb use in this population carries the risk for selecting mAb-resistant variants, which could pose a public health concern if they disseminate to the general population.
Expert opinion: Going forward, structural knowledge of the interactions of Spike with its cellular receptor has identified several regions that may be good targets for future mAb therapeutics. A focus on designing variant-resistant mAbs together with cocktails that target several epitopes and the use of other variant mitigating strategies such as the concomitant use of small molecule antivirals and polyclonal preparations could extend the clinical usefulness of future preparations.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy.
Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development.
The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease.
The journal welcomes:
Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine
Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent
Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results;
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.