宫颈癌研究中的组织芯片验证。一种方法论途径。

IF 2.5 4区 生物学 Q3 CELL BIOLOGY Histology and histopathology Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.14670/HH-18-796
Lucília Lovane, Carla Carrilho, Christina Karlsson
{"title":"宫颈癌研究中的组织芯片验证。一种方法论途径。","authors":"Lucília Lovane, Carla Carrilho, Christina Karlsson","doi":"10.14670/HH-18-796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tissue microarrays (TMAs) are a cost-effective tool to study biomarkers in clinical research. Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the most prevalent in women worldwide, with the highest prevalence in low-middle-income countries due to a lack of organized screening. CC is associated with persistent high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Several biomarkers have been studied for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes. We aimed to evaluate and validate the effectiveness of TMA in CC compared to whole slide images (WSs). We selected and anonymized twenty cases of CC. P16, cytokeratin 5 (CK5), cytokeratin 7 (CK7), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and CD8 expression were immunohistochemically investigated. All WS were scanned and 10 representative virtual TMA cores with 0.6 mm diameter per sample were selected. Ten random combinations of 1-5 cylinders per case were assessed for each biomarker. The agreement of scoring between TMA and WS was evaluated by kappa statistics. We found that three cores of 0.6 mm on TMA can accurately represent WS in our setting. The Kappa value between TMA and WS varied from 1 for p16 to 0.61 for PD-L1. Our study presents an approach to address TMA sampling that could be generalized to TMA-based research, regardless of the tissue and biomarkers of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":13164,"journal":{"name":"Histology and histopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tissue microarray validation in cervical carcinoma studies. A methodological approach.\",\"authors\":\"Lucília Lovane, Carla Carrilho, Christina Karlsson\",\"doi\":\"10.14670/HH-18-796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tissue microarrays (TMAs) are a cost-effective tool to study biomarkers in clinical research. Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the most prevalent in women worldwide, with the highest prevalence in low-middle-income countries due to a lack of organized screening. CC is associated with persistent high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Several biomarkers have been studied for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes. We aimed to evaluate and validate the effectiveness of TMA in CC compared to whole slide images (WSs). We selected and anonymized twenty cases of CC. P16, cytokeratin 5 (CK5), cytokeratin 7 (CK7), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and CD8 expression were immunohistochemically investigated. All WS were scanned and 10 representative virtual TMA cores with 0.6 mm diameter per sample were selected. Ten random combinations of 1-5 cylinders per case were assessed for each biomarker. The agreement of scoring between TMA and WS was evaluated by kappa statistics. We found that three cores of 0.6 mm on TMA can accurately represent WS in our setting. The Kappa value between TMA and WS varied from 1 for p16 to 0.61 for PD-L1. Our study presents an approach to address TMA sampling that could be generalized to TMA-based research, regardless of the tissue and biomarkers of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Histology and histopathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Histology and histopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-18-796\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Histology and histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-18-796","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

组织芯片(TMA)是临床研究中研究生物标记物的一种经济有效的工具。宫颈癌(CC)是全球妇女的高发病之一,由于缺乏有组织的筛查,中低收入国家的发病率最高。宫颈癌与持续的高危人类乳头瘤病毒感染有关。目前已研究出多种用于诊断、治疗和预后的生物标志物。我们的目的是评估和验证 TMA 与全切片图像(WSs)相比在 CC 中的有效性。我们选取了 20 例 CC 病例并对其进行了匿名处理。对 P16、细胞角蛋白 5 (CK5)、细胞角蛋白 7 (CK7)、程序性死亡配体 1 (PD-L1) 和 CD8 的表达进行了免疫组化检测。扫描所有 WS,并为每个样本选择 10 个直径为 0.6 毫米的代表性虚拟 TMA 核心。对每个生物标记物评估了每个病例 1-5 个圆柱的 10 个随机组合。TMA 和 WS 之间的评分一致性通过卡帕统计进行评估。我们发现,在我们的病例中,TMA 上三个 0.6 毫米的核心可准确代表 WS。TMA 和 WS 之间的 Kappa 值从 p16 的 1 到 PD-L1 的 0.61 不等。我们的研究提出了一种解决 TMA 取样问题的方法,这种方法可以推广到基于 TMA 的研究中,无论感兴趣的组织和生物标记物是什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tissue microarray validation in cervical carcinoma studies. A methodological approach.

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) are a cost-effective tool to study biomarkers in clinical research. Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the most prevalent in women worldwide, with the highest prevalence in low-middle-income countries due to a lack of organized screening. CC is associated with persistent high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Several biomarkers have been studied for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes. We aimed to evaluate and validate the effectiveness of TMA in CC compared to whole slide images (WSs). We selected and anonymized twenty cases of CC. P16, cytokeratin 5 (CK5), cytokeratin 7 (CK7), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and CD8 expression were immunohistochemically investigated. All WS were scanned and 10 representative virtual TMA cores with 0.6 mm diameter per sample were selected. Ten random combinations of 1-5 cylinders per case were assessed for each biomarker. The agreement of scoring between TMA and WS was evaluated by kappa statistics. We found that three cores of 0.6 mm on TMA can accurately represent WS in our setting. The Kappa value between TMA and WS varied from 1 for p16 to 0.61 for PD-L1. Our study presents an approach to address TMA sampling that could be generalized to TMA-based research, regardless of the tissue and biomarkers of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Histology and histopathology
Histology and histopathology 生物-病理学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
232
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HISTOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY is a peer-reviewed international journal, the purpose of which is to publish original and review articles in all fields of the microscopical morphology, cell biology and tissue engineering; high quality is the overall consideration. Its format is the standard international size of 21 x 27.7 cm. One volume is published every year (more than 1,300 pages, approximately 90 original works and 40 reviews). Each volume consists of 12 numbers published monthly online. The printed version of the journal includes 4 books every year; each of them compiles 3 numbers previously published online.
期刊最新文献
Correlation of NAT10 expression with clinical data and survival profiles in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients, and its impact on cell proliferation and apoptosis. Qualitative evaluations of reactive microglial heterogeneity in cultured porcine retina. S100A2 upregulates GLUT1 expression to promote glycolysis in the progression of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oridonin alleviates inflammation and endoplasmic reticulum stress in pediatric pneumonia via regulating the SIRT1-mediated Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Brain endothelial cell activation and dysfunction associate with and contribute to the development of enlarged perivascular spaces and cerebral small vessel disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1