参加医疗保险的晚期卵巢癌患者使用靶向疗法的种族和社会人口差异。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Gynecological Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1136/ijgc-2024-005599
Anne Knisely, Chi-Fang Wu, Alexa Kanbergs, Nuria Agusti, Kirsten A Jorgensen, Alexander Melamed, Sharon H Giordano, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Roni Nitecki Wilke
{"title":"参加医疗保险的晚期卵巢癌患者使用靶向疗法的种族和社会人口差异。","authors":"Anne Knisely, Chi-Fang Wu, Alexa Kanbergs, Nuria Agusti, Kirsten A Jorgensen, Alexander Melamed, Sharon H Giordano, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Roni Nitecki Wilke","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2024-005599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe sociodemographic and racial disparities in receipt of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and bevacizumab among insured patients with ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to identify patients with advanced stage, high grade serous ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2019. The primary outcome of interest was receipt of PARPi or bevacizumab at any time after diagnosis. χ<sup>2</sup> tests were used to compare categorical variables. Factors independently associated with the receipt of PARPi and/or bevacizumab were identified using a multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 6242 patients; 276 (4.4%) received PARPi, 2142 (34.3%) received bevacizumab, and 389 (6.2%) received both. Receipt of either targeted treatment increased over the study period. On univariate analysis, patients who received either targeted therapy were younger (63% vs 48% aged <75 years; p<0.001), had a lower comorbidity index (86% vs 80% Charlson Comorbidity Index 0-1; p<0.001), and higher socioeconomic status (74% vs 71% high socioeconomic status; p=0.047) compared with those who did not receive targeted therapy. In the multivariable model, non-Hispanic black patients were less likely than non-Hispanic white patients to receive either targeted therapy (odds ratio 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.98; p=0.032). Older patients (aged >74 years) were also less likely to receive PARPi or bevacizumab compared with those aged 65-69 years (all p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sociodemographic and racial disparities exist in receipt of PARPi and bevacizumab among patients with advanced ovarian cancer insured by Medicare. As targeted therapies become more commonly used, a widening disparity gap is likely.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"1661-1670"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial and sociodemographic disparities in the use of targeted therapies in advanced ovarian cancer patients with Medicare.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Knisely, Chi-Fang Wu, Alexa Kanbergs, Nuria Agusti, Kirsten A Jorgensen, Alexander Melamed, Sharon H Giordano, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Roni Nitecki Wilke\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ijgc-2024-005599\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe sociodemographic and racial disparities in receipt of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and bevacizumab among insured patients with ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to identify patients with advanced stage, high grade serous ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2019. The primary outcome of interest was receipt of PARPi or bevacizumab at any time after diagnosis. χ<sup>2</sup> tests were used to compare categorical variables. Factors independently associated with the receipt of PARPi and/or bevacizumab were identified using a multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 6242 patients; 276 (4.4%) received PARPi, 2142 (34.3%) received bevacizumab, and 389 (6.2%) received both. Receipt of either targeted treatment increased over the study period. On univariate analysis, patients who received either targeted therapy were younger (63% vs 48% aged <75 years; p<0.001), had a lower comorbidity index (86% vs 80% Charlson Comorbidity Index 0-1; p<0.001), and higher socioeconomic status (74% vs 71% high socioeconomic status; p=0.047) compared with those who did not receive targeted therapy. In the multivariable model, non-Hispanic black patients were less likely than non-Hispanic white patients to receive either targeted therapy (odds ratio 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.98; p=0.032). Older patients (aged >74 years) were also less likely to receive PARPi or bevacizumab compared with those aged 65-69 years (all p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sociodemographic and racial disparities exist in receipt of PARPi and bevacizumab among patients with advanced ovarian cancer insured by Medicare. As targeted therapies become more commonly used, a widening disparity gap is likely.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1661-1670\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534538/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005599\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005599","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的描述参保卵巢癌患者在接受多聚 ADP 核糖聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi)和贝伐珠单抗治疗方面的社会人口和种族差异:这项回顾性研究使用监测、流行病学和终末结果(SEER)--医疗保险数据库来识别2010年至2019年期间确诊的晚期高级别浆液性卵巢癌患者。研究的主要结果是患者在确诊后的任何时间接受了 PARPi 或贝伐单抗治疗。采用χ2检验比较分类变量。使用多变量逻辑回归确定了与接受 PARPi 和/或贝伐单抗独立相关的因素:队列中包括 6242 名患者,其中 276 人(4.4%)接受了 PARPi 治疗,2142 人(34.3%)接受了贝伐单抗治疗,389 人(6.2%)同时接受了这两种治疗。在研究期间,接受其中一种靶向治疗的患者人数有所增加。单变量分析显示,与 65-69 岁的患者相比,接受其中一种靶向治疗的患者更年轻(63% 对 48%,74 岁),接受 PARPi 或贝伐单抗治疗的可能性也更小(所有 p 均为 0):医疗保险的晚期卵巢癌患者在接受 PARPi 和贝伐单抗治疗方面存在社会人口和种族差异。随着靶向疗法的使用越来越普遍,差距可能会越来越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Racial and sociodemographic disparities in the use of targeted therapies in advanced ovarian cancer patients with Medicare.

Objective: To describe sociodemographic and racial disparities in receipt of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and bevacizumab among insured patients with ovarian cancer.

Methods: This retrospective study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to identify patients with advanced stage, high grade serous ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2019. The primary outcome of interest was receipt of PARPi or bevacizumab at any time after diagnosis. χ2 tests were used to compare categorical variables. Factors independently associated with the receipt of PARPi and/or bevacizumab were identified using a multivariable logistic regression.

Results: The cohort included 6242 patients; 276 (4.4%) received PARPi, 2142 (34.3%) received bevacizumab, and 389 (6.2%) received both. Receipt of either targeted treatment increased over the study period. On univariate analysis, patients who received either targeted therapy were younger (63% vs 48% aged <75 years; p<0.001), had a lower comorbidity index (86% vs 80% Charlson Comorbidity Index 0-1; p<0.001), and higher socioeconomic status (74% vs 71% high socioeconomic status; p=0.047) compared with those who did not receive targeted therapy. In the multivariable model, non-Hispanic black patients were less likely than non-Hispanic white patients to receive either targeted therapy (odds ratio 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.98; p=0.032). Older patients (aged >74 years) were also less likely to receive PARPi or bevacizumab compared with those aged 65-69 years (all p<0.001).

Conclusion: Sociodemographic and racial disparities exist in receipt of PARPi and bevacizumab among patients with advanced ovarian cancer insured by Medicare. As targeted therapies become more commonly used, a widening disparity gap is likely.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
期刊最新文献
TERT promoter mutations and survival outcomes in adult-type granulosa cell tumors. The prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in vulvovaginal melanoma. First robotic radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer using the Hugo RAS platform. Secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent endometrial cancer: can we predict the future? Mixed neuroendocrine and endometrioid carcinoma of the endometrium: a rare aggressive malignancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1