在佛罗里达州中西部,对使用洛替兰纳(Credelio®)和旋覆花(Comfortis®)防治狗身上的跳蚤和皮肤病进行家庭评估。

Q1 Veterinary Veterinary Parasitology: X Pub Date : 2019-04-04 eCollection Date: 2019-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.vpoa.2019.100009
Michael W Dryden, Michael S Canfield, Brian H Herrin, Cara Bocon, Todd S Bress, Anna Hickert, Todd M Kollasch, Letitia Phan, Anthony J Rumschlag, William G Ryan, Bridgette Sampeck, Nicole Smith, Vicki Smith, Stanislaw A Warcholek
{"title":"在佛罗里达州中西部,对使用洛替兰纳(Credelio®)和旋覆花(Comfortis®)防治狗身上的跳蚤和皮肤病进行家庭评估。","authors":"Michael W Dryden, Michael S Canfield, Brian H Herrin, Cara Bocon, Todd S Bress, Anna Hickert, Todd M Kollasch, Letitia Phan, Anthony J Rumschlag, William G Ryan, Bridgette Sampeck, Nicole Smith, Vicki Smith, Stanislaw A Warcholek","doi":"10.1016/j.vpoa.2019.100009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-launch field investigations of recently-approved flea control products establish an efficacy baseline and in subsequent years can detect any efficacy decline suggestive of emerging resistance. As part of a continuing program of yearly assessment of flea control products in west central Florida, this study, using client-owned dogs, investigated the efficacy of lotilaner and spinosad in controlling fleas and in alleviating dermatologic signs likely associated with flea infestations. Forty-four qualifying households were randomized to either a lotilaner (Credelio<sup>®</sup>) (minimum dose rate 20 mg/kg) or a spinosad (Comfortis<sup>®</sup>) (30 mg/kg) group, with 33 and 36 dogs in each group, respectively. On Days 0 and 28 (±2) all dogs in each household were treated with the allocated product according to label directions, and all household cats received spinetoram (Cheristin<sup>®</sup>). On Day 0 and at weekly intervals through Day 56 (±2), on-animal and premises flea burdens were enumerated, a veterinary dermatologist scored integumental changes using canine atopic dermatitis extent and severity index (CADESI)-4 and flea allergy dermatitis (FAD) scales, and owners scored pruritus using the validated canine pruritus severity scale (CPSS). At study entry geometric mean flea counts were 33.2 and 29.9 in the lotilaner and spinosad groups, respectively. For both groups, reductions in flea counts were > 99% at the first post-treatment assessment (Week 1), and 100% from Week 6 through the final assessment (Week 8) when all study dogs were flea-free. For both groups, at each timepoint, flea counts on dogs and in traps were significantly reduced compared to the initial assessment (p < 0.001), as were improvements in median CADESI-4, FAD and CPSS scores (p ≤ 0.001). At Week 4, the geometric mean flea count on dogs in the lotilaner group (0.1) was significantly lower than that of dogs in the spinosad group (0.6) (p = 0.027), significantly fewer dogs in the lotilaner group were found to have fleas (p = 0.034), and mean owner-rated pruritus scores were significantly lower (p = 0.025). Under field conditions favoring heavy flea challenge, two consecutive monthly treatments of dogs with either lotilaner or spinosad produced a 100% reduction in canine flea infestations and dramatic improvements in dermatologic lesions and pruritus, based on scoring by a veterinary dermatologist and by dog owners. Household flea burdens were driven to extinction in all but one home in each treatment group.</p>","PeriodicalId":23537,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Parasitology: X","volume":"1 ","pages":"100009"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-home assessment of flea control and dermatologic lesions in dogs provided by lotilaner (Credelio<sup>®</sup>) and spinosad (Comfortis<sup>®</sup>) in west central Florida.\",\"authors\":\"Michael W Dryden, Michael S Canfield, Brian H Herrin, Cara Bocon, Todd S Bress, Anna Hickert, Todd M Kollasch, Letitia Phan, Anthony J Rumschlag, William G Ryan, Bridgette Sampeck, Nicole Smith, Vicki Smith, Stanislaw A Warcholek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vpoa.2019.100009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Post-launch field investigations of recently-approved flea control products establish an efficacy baseline and in subsequent years can detect any efficacy decline suggestive of emerging resistance. As part of a continuing program of yearly assessment of flea control products in west central Florida, this study, using client-owned dogs, investigated the efficacy of lotilaner and spinosad in controlling fleas and in alleviating dermatologic signs likely associated with flea infestations. Forty-four qualifying households were randomized to either a lotilaner (Credelio<sup>®</sup>) (minimum dose rate 20 mg/kg) or a spinosad (Comfortis<sup>®</sup>) (30 mg/kg) group, with 33 and 36 dogs in each group, respectively. On Days 0 and 28 (±2) all dogs in each household were treated with the allocated product according to label directions, and all household cats received spinetoram (Cheristin<sup>®</sup>). On Day 0 and at weekly intervals through Day 56 (±2), on-animal and premises flea burdens were enumerated, a veterinary dermatologist scored integumental changes using canine atopic dermatitis extent and severity index (CADESI)-4 and flea allergy dermatitis (FAD) scales, and owners scored pruritus using the validated canine pruritus severity scale (CPSS). At study entry geometric mean flea counts were 33.2 and 29.9 in the lotilaner and spinosad groups, respectively. For both groups, reductions in flea counts were > 99% at the first post-treatment assessment (Week 1), and 100% from Week 6 through the final assessment (Week 8) when all study dogs were flea-free. For both groups, at each timepoint, flea counts on dogs and in traps were significantly reduced compared to the initial assessment (p < 0.001), as were improvements in median CADESI-4, FAD and CPSS scores (p ≤ 0.001). At Week 4, the geometric mean flea count on dogs in the lotilaner group (0.1) was significantly lower than that of dogs in the spinosad group (0.6) (p = 0.027), significantly fewer dogs in the lotilaner group were found to have fleas (p = 0.034), and mean owner-rated pruritus scores were significantly lower (p = 0.025). Under field conditions favoring heavy flea challenge, two consecutive monthly treatments of dogs with either lotilaner or spinosad produced a 100% reduction in canine flea infestations and dramatic improvements in dermatologic lesions and pruritus, based on scoring by a veterinary dermatologist and by dog owners. Household flea burdens were driven to extinction in all but one home in each treatment group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Parasitology: X\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"100009\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7458372/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Parasitology: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vpoa.2019.100009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Veterinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Parasitology: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vpoa.2019.100009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对新近批准的跳蚤控制产品进行上市后实地调查,可以建立一个功效基线,并在随后几年中检测出任何表明出现抗药性的功效下降情况。作为佛罗里达州中西部地区跳蚤控制产品年度评估持续计划的一部分,本研究使用客户饲养的狗,调查了乐蒂来纳和旋喷磷在控制跳蚤和减轻可能与跳蚤侵扰有关的皮肤病症状方面的功效。44 个符合条件的家庭被随机分配到乐替兰(Credelio®)(最小剂量为 20 毫克/千克)或旋喷磷(Comfortis®)(30 毫克/千克)组,每组分别有 33 和 36 只狗。在第 0 天和第 28 天(±2),每个家庭中的所有狗都按照标签说明接受了指定产品的治疗,所有家庭中的猫都接受了辛硫磷(Cheristin®)治疗。在第 0 天和第 56 天(±2)内的每周间隔期间,统计动物身上和房舍内的跳蚤数量,兽医皮肤科医生使用犬特应性皮炎范围和严重程度指数 (CADESI)-4 和跳蚤过敏性皮炎 (FAD) 量表对皮肤变化进行评分,主人使用有效的犬瘙痒严重程度量表 (CPSS) 对瘙痒进行评分。研究开始时,乐蒂兰诺组和旋喷磷组的几何平均跳蚤数量分别为 33.2 只和 29.9 只。在治疗后的第一次评估(第 1 周)中,两组的跳蚤数量降幅均大于 99%,从第 6 周到最终评估(第 8 周),跳蚤数量降幅均为 100%,此时所有研究犬均无跳蚤。在每个时间点,两组研究犬身上和诱捕器中的跳蚤数量都比首次评估时显著减少(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In-home assessment of flea control and dermatologic lesions in dogs provided by lotilaner (Credelio®) and spinosad (Comfortis®) in west central Florida.

Post-launch field investigations of recently-approved flea control products establish an efficacy baseline and in subsequent years can detect any efficacy decline suggestive of emerging resistance. As part of a continuing program of yearly assessment of flea control products in west central Florida, this study, using client-owned dogs, investigated the efficacy of lotilaner and spinosad in controlling fleas and in alleviating dermatologic signs likely associated with flea infestations. Forty-four qualifying households were randomized to either a lotilaner (Credelio®) (minimum dose rate 20 mg/kg) or a spinosad (Comfortis®) (30 mg/kg) group, with 33 and 36 dogs in each group, respectively. On Days 0 and 28 (±2) all dogs in each household were treated with the allocated product according to label directions, and all household cats received spinetoram (Cheristin®). On Day 0 and at weekly intervals through Day 56 (±2), on-animal and premises flea burdens were enumerated, a veterinary dermatologist scored integumental changes using canine atopic dermatitis extent and severity index (CADESI)-4 and flea allergy dermatitis (FAD) scales, and owners scored pruritus using the validated canine pruritus severity scale (CPSS). At study entry geometric mean flea counts were 33.2 and 29.9 in the lotilaner and spinosad groups, respectively. For both groups, reductions in flea counts were > 99% at the first post-treatment assessment (Week 1), and 100% from Week 6 through the final assessment (Week 8) when all study dogs were flea-free. For both groups, at each timepoint, flea counts on dogs and in traps were significantly reduced compared to the initial assessment (p < 0.001), as were improvements in median CADESI-4, FAD and CPSS scores (p ≤ 0.001). At Week 4, the geometric mean flea count on dogs in the lotilaner group (0.1) was significantly lower than that of dogs in the spinosad group (0.6) (p = 0.027), significantly fewer dogs in the lotilaner group were found to have fleas (p = 0.034), and mean owner-rated pruritus scores were significantly lower (p = 0.025). Under field conditions favoring heavy flea challenge, two consecutive monthly treatments of dogs with either lotilaner or spinosad produced a 100% reduction in canine flea infestations and dramatic improvements in dermatologic lesions and pruritus, based on scoring by a veterinary dermatologist and by dog owners. Household flea burdens were driven to extinction in all but one home in each treatment group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Parasitology: X
Veterinary Parasitology: X Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trichinella spiralis - New method for sample preparation and objective detection of specific antigens using a chemiluminescence immunoassay. Potentials of using milk performance data and FAMACHA score as indicators for Targeted Selective Treatment in Lacaune dairy sheep in Switzerland. In-home assessment of flea control and dermatologic lesions in dogs provided by lotilaner (Credelio®) and spinosad (Comfortis®) in west central Florida. Efficacy of an injectable toltrazuril - gleptoferron (Forceris®) to control coccidiosis (Cystoisospora suis) in comparison with iron supplemented piglets without anticoccidial treatment. Comparative assessment of faecal diagnostics for detection and predictive modelling of endemic Fasciola hepatica infection in sheep and cattle on Australian farms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1