[使用封闭系统药物传输装置对抗癌药物制备时间的影响]。

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1248/yakushi.24-00077
Toshihisa Nakashima, Kana Tsukiji, Akiko Kubo, Rena Nishigaki, Daisuke Watabe, Yoshimasa Saito, Toru Akagi, Hironobu Hashimoto
{"title":"[使用封闭系统药物传输装置对抗癌药物制备时间的影响]。","authors":"Toshihisa Nakashima, Kana Tsukiji, Akiko Kubo, Rena Nishigaki, Daisuke Watabe, Yoshimasa Saito, Toru Akagi, Hironobu Hashimoto","doi":"10.1248/yakushi.24-00077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A closed system drug transfer device (CSTD) helps to minimize unnecessary exposure of healthcare workers such as pharmacists to hazardous drugs. One of the concerns in using CSTDs to prepare anticancer drugs is their influence on preparation time. Therefore, we compared the time needed to prepare anticancer drugs with the CSTDs NEOSHIELD<sup>®</sup> and BD PhaSeal<sup>®</sup> system and with an injection needle. In the comparison of NEOSHIELD<sup>®</sup> and an injection needle, the preparation time of the liquid formulations of the cytotoxic drugs irinotecan, eribulin, cisplatin, docetaxel, and paclitaxel was significantly shorter with the injection needle and that of gemcitabine was significantly shorter with NEOSHIELD<sup>®</sup>, but that of oxaliplatin, carboplatin, and doxorubicin was not significantly different between the two methods; the preparation time of the liquid formulations of the molecular-targeted drugs atezolizumab, obinutuzumab, cetuximab, daratumumab and vorhyaluronidase alfa, nivolumab, ramucirumab, and rituximab was significantly shorter with NEOSHIELD<sup>®</sup> and that of bevacizumab and pembrolizumab was significantly shorter with the injection needle; and the preparation time of the lyophilized formulation of cytotoxic and molecular-targeted drugs was not significantly different between the two methods. In the comparison of NEOSHIELD<sup>®</sup> and BD PhaSeal<sup>®</sup> system, the preparation time of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide was significantly shorter with NEOSHIELD<sup>®</sup>, but that of bendamustine was not significantly different between the two CSTDs. In conclusion, these results suggest that the preparation time with CSTDs may be similar to or shorter than that with an injection needle, depending on the type of CSTD and the drug formulation and type.</p>","PeriodicalId":23810,"journal":{"name":"Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Influence of the Use of a Closed System Drug Transfer Device on the Preparation Time of Anticancer Drugs].\",\"authors\":\"Toshihisa Nakashima, Kana Tsukiji, Akiko Kubo, Rena Nishigaki, Daisuke Watabe, Yoshimasa Saito, Toru Akagi, Hironobu Hashimoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1248/yakushi.24-00077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A closed system drug transfer device (CSTD) helps to minimize unnecessary exposure of healthcare workers such as pharmacists to hazardous drugs. One of the concerns in using CSTDs to prepare anticancer drugs is their influence on preparation time. Therefore, we compared the time needed to prepare anticancer drugs with the CSTDs NEOSHIELD<sup>®</sup> and BD PhaSeal<sup>®</sup> system and with an injection needle. In the comparison of NEOSHIELD<sup>®</sup> and an injection needle, the preparation time of the liquid formulations of the cytotoxic drugs irinotecan, eribulin, cisplatin, docetaxel, and paclitaxel was significantly shorter with the injection needle and that of gemcitabine was significantly shorter with NEOSHIELD<sup>®</sup>, but that of oxaliplatin, carboplatin, and doxorubicin was not significantly different between the two methods; the preparation time of the liquid formulations of the molecular-targeted drugs atezolizumab, obinutuzumab, cetuximab, daratumumab and vorhyaluronidase alfa, nivolumab, ramucirumab, and rituximab was significantly shorter with NEOSHIELD<sup>®</sup> and that of bevacizumab and pembrolizumab was significantly shorter with the injection needle; and the preparation time of the lyophilized formulation of cytotoxic and molecular-targeted drugs was not significantly different between the two methods. In the comparison of NEOSHIELD<sup>®</sup> and BD PhaSeal<sup>®</sup> system, the preparation time of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide was significantly shorter with NEOSHIELD<sup>®</sup>, but that of bendamustine was not significantly different between the two CSTDs. In conclusion, these results suggest that the preparation time with CSTDs may be similar to or shorter than that with an injection needle, depending on the type of CSTD and the drug formulation and type.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.24-00077\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yakugaku zasshi : Journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.24-00077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

封闭式系统药物传输装置(CSTD)有助于最大限度地减少药剂师等医护人员与危险药物的不必要接触。使用 CSTD 配制抗癌药物的一个问题是其对配制时间的影响。因此,我们比较了使用 CSTD NEOSHIELD® 和 BD PhaSeal® 系统以及注射针配制抗癌药物所需的时间。在 NEOSHIELD® 和注射针的比较中,细胞毒性药物伊立替康、埃里布林、顺铂、多西他赛和紫杉醇的液体制剂制备时间用注射针明显缩短,吉西他滨的制备时间用 NEOSHIELD® 明显缩短,但奥沙利铂、卡铂和多柔比星的制备时间在两种方法之间没有明显差异;使用 NEOSHIELD®,分子靶向药物 atezolizumab、obinutuzumab、cetuximab、daratumumab 和 vorhyaluronidase alfa、nivolumab、ramucirumab 和 rituximab 的液体制剂的制备时间明显缩短;使用注射针,贝伐珠单抗和 pembrolizumab 的制备时间明显缩短;细胞毒性药物和分子靶向药物冻干制剂的制备时间在两种方法之间没有明显差异。在 NEOSHIELD® 和 BD PhaSeal® 系统的比较中,NEOSHIELD® 的环磷酰胺和伊福酰胺制备时间明显更短,但两种 CSTD 的苯达莫司汀制备时间无明显差异。总之,这些结果表明,使用 CSTD 的制备时间可能与使用注射针的制备时间相似或更短,具体取决于 CSTD 的类型以及药物的配方和类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Influence of the Use of a Closed System Drug Transfer Device on the Preparation Time of Anticancer Drugs].

A closed system drug transfer device (CSTD) helps to minimize unnecessary exposure of healthcare workers such as pharmacists to hazardous drugs. One of the concerns in using CSTDs to prepare anticancer drugs is their influence on preparation time. Therefore, we compared the time needed to prepare anticancer drugs with the CSTDs NEOSHIELD® and BD PhaSeal® system and with an injection needle. In the comparison of NEOSHIELD® and an injection needle, the preparation time of the liquid formulations of the cytotoxic drugs irinotecan, eribulin, cisplatin, docetaxel, and paclitaxel was significantly shorter with the injection needle and that of gemcitabine was significantly shorter with NEOSHIELD®, but that of oxaliplatin, carboplatin, and doxorubicin was not significantly different between the two methods; the preparation time of the liquid formulations of the molecular-targeted drugs atezolizumab, obinutuzumab, cetuximab, daratumumab and vorhyaluronidase alfa, nivolumab, ramucirumab, and rituximab was significantly shorter with NEOSHIELD® and that of bevacizumab and pembrolizumab was significantly shorter with the injection needle; and the preparation time of the lyophilized formulation of cytotoxic and molecular-targeted drugs was not significantly different between the two methods. In the comparison of NEOSHIELD® and BD PhaSeal® system, the preparation time of cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide was significantly shorter with NEOSHIELD®, but that of bendamustine was not significantly different between the two CSTDs. In conclusion, these results suggest that the preparation time with CSTDs may be similar to or shorter than that with an injection needle, depending on the type of CSTD and the drug formulation and type.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
169
审稿时长
1 months
期刊最新文献
[Development of an Odor Evaluation Method for Citrus Unshiu Peel Using an Electronic Nose Based on the Intensity of per Unit Length (INPULTH)]. [The Impact of a Picture Book to Improve Medication Compliance in Pediatric Patients: A Questionnaire Survey]. [What is the Initiating Reaction for the Lipid Radical Chain Reaction System That Can Induce Ferroptotic Cell Death at the Lower Oxygen Content?] [Exploration of Risk Factors of the Onset of Antibiotics-induced Acute Kidney Injury and Its Transfer to Chronic Kidney Disease Using the Medical Information Database]. [Xanthan Gum-based Food Thickeners Reduce Disintegration Time of Medical and OTC Loxoprofen Sodium Tablets].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1