用于解决医患沟通问题和减少多个企业风险管理领域医疗风险因素的评估工具项目。

Rawan Narwal-Kasmani MD, FACP, Julie M. Stausmire MSN, APRN-CNS, Kathleen A. McCarthy MA, BSN, CHSE, Nancy Buderer MS, Amanda Gutek BS, Charla A. Ulrich DNP, MOD, CPHQ, CPPS, CIC
{"title":"用于解决医患沟通问题和减少多个企业风险管理领域医疗风险因素的评估工具项目。","authors":"Rawan Narwal-Kasmani MD, FACP,&nbsp;Julie M. Stausmire MSN, APRN-CNS,&nbsp;Kathleen A. McCarthy MA, BSN, CHSE,&nbsp;Nancy Buderer MS,&nbsp;Amanda Gutek BS,&nbsp;Charla A. Ulrich DNP, MOD, CPHQ, CPPS, CIC","doi":"10.1002/jhrm.21581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Expertise in physician-patient communication is a primary outcome measure for physicians. We evaluated residents’ communication behaviors with clinic patients following an educational intervention as measured by the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). Thirty-five internal medicine residents were assessed by patients using the CAT for 3 months before and after the educational intervention. The intervention included a simulated, videotaped patient encounter, mock CAT, and preceptor coaching during video review. The primary outcome was the percentage of CAT items receiving an “excellent” rating from patients before and after the intervention. Research results were compared to previously published CAT studies. Within-resident improvement in the percentage of excellent ratings was small with median changes between 0 and 3 percentage points. Compared to previously published studies, similar results were found for the highest and lowest-scored communication items. Many clinical encounters are time-limited, and physicians do not pursue time-consuming conversations that could reduce health care risk. This data and other published studies suggest seven communication items taking the most time to complete (i.e., shared decision-making) were items demonstrating little or no improvement. This study identified clinical performance risk factors applicable to the Enterprise Risk Management Framework that could impact complication and readmission rates if addressed by changes in physician-patient communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":39819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management","volume":"44 1","pages":"24-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment tool items for addressing physician-patient communication and reducing health care risk factors across multiple enterprise risk management domains\",\"authors\":\"Rawan Narwal-Kasmani MD, FACP,&nbsp;Julie M. Stausmire MSN, APRN-CNS,&nbsp;Kathleen A. McCarthy MA, BSN, CHSE,&nbsp;Nancy Buderer MS,&nbsp;Amanda Gutek BS,&nbsp;Charla A. Ulrich DNP, MOD, CPHQ, CPPS, CIC\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhrm.21581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Expertise in physician-patient communication is a primary outcome measure for physicians. We evaluated residents’ communication behaviors with clinic patients following an educational intervention as measured by the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). Thirty-five internal medicine residents were assessed by patients using the CAT for 3 months before and after the educational intervention. The intervention included a simulated, videotaped patient encounter, mock CAT, and preceptor coaching during video review. The primary outcome was the percentage of CAT items receiving an “excellent” rating from patients before and after the intervention. Research results were compared to previously published CAT studies. Within-resident improvement in the percentage of excellent ratings was small with median changes between 0 and 3 percentage points. Compared to previously published studies, similar results were found for the highest and lowest-scored communication items. Many clinical encounters are time-limited, and physicians do not pursue time-consuming conversations that could reduce health care risk. This data and other published studies suggest seven communication items taking the most time to complete (i.e., shared decision-making) were items demonstrating little or no improvement. This study identified clinical performance risk factors applicable to the Enterprise Risk Management Framework that could impact complication and readmission rates if addressed by changes in physician-patient communication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"24-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhrm.21581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhrm.21581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医患沟通方面的专业知识是衡量医生工作成果的主要标准。我们通过沟通评估工具(CAT)评估了住院医师在接受教育干预后与门诊患者的沟通行为。在教育干预前后 3 个月内,35 名内科住院医师使用 CAT 接受了患者的评估。干预措施包括模拟患者就诊录像、模拟 CAT 和视频审查期间的戒酒师指导。主要结果是干预前后获得患者 "优秀 "评级的 CAT 项目的百分比。研究结果与之前发表的 CAT 研究结果进行了比较。住院医师内部的 "优秀 "评分比例提高幅度较小,变化中位数在 0 到 3 个百分点之间。与之前发表的研究结果相比,得分最高和最低的沟通项目结果相似。许多临床会诊都有时间限制,医生不会进行耗时的对话来降低医疗风险。本数据和其他已发表的研究表明,需要花费最多时间完成的七个沟通项目(即共同决策)几乎没有改善。这项研究确定了适用于企业风险管理框架的临床绩效风险因素,如果通过改变医患沟通来解决这些问题,就能影响并发症和再入院率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment tool items for addressing physician-patient communication and reducing health care risk factors across multiple enterprise risk management domains

Expertise in physician-patient communication is a primary outcome measure for physicians. We evaluated residents’ communication behaviors with clinic patients following an educational intervention as measured by the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). Thirty-five internal medicine residents were assessed by patients using the CAT for 3 months before and after the educational intervention. The intervention included a simulated, videotaped patient encounter, mock CAT, and preceptor coaching during video review. The primary outcome was the percentage of CAT items receiving an “excellent” rating from patients before and after the intervention. Research results were compared to previously published CAT studies. Within-resident improvement in the percentage of excellent ratings was small with median changes between 0 and 3 percentage points. Compared to previously published studies, similar results were found for the highest and lowest-scored communication items. Many clinical encounters are time-limited, and physicians do not pursue time-consuming conversations that could reduce health care risk. This data and other published studies suggest seven communication items taking the most time to complete (i.e., shared decision-making) were items demonstrating little or no improvement. This study identified clinical performance risk factors applicable to the Enterprise Risk Management Framework that could impact complication and readmission rates if addressed by changes in physician-patient communication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Risk Management is published quarterly by the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management (ASHRM). The purpose of the journal is to publish research, trends, and new developments in the field of healthcare risk management with the ultimate goal of advancing safe and trusted patient-centered healthcare delivery and promoting proactive and innovative management of organization-wide risk. The journal focuses on insightful, peer-reviewed content that relates to patient safety, emergency preparedness, insurance, legal, leadership, and other timely healthcare risk management issues.
期刊最新文献
Haddon matrix model: Application to workplace violence in a hospital setting. Case law update. Creation of root cause analysis and action (RCA2) standard work by a multidisciplinary team to prevent harm, reduce bias, and improve safety culture. Streamlining incident reporting system: A lean approach to enhance patient and staff safety in a Middle Eastern prehospital emergency care setting. Humbled and honored.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1