连续血糖监测中数据丢失对临床决策的影响:回顾性队列研究

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Interactive Journal of Medical Research Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.2196/50849
Niala den Braber, Carlijn I R Braem, Miriam M R Vollenbroek-Hutten, Hermie J Hermens, Thomas Urgert, Utku S Yavuz, Peter H Veltink, Gozewijn D Laverman
{"title":"连续血糖监测中数据丢失对临床决策的影响:回顾性队列研究","authors":"Niala den Braber, Carlijn I R Braem, Miriam M R Vollenbroek-Hutten, Hermie J Hermens, Thomas Urgert, Utku S Yavuz, Peter H Veltink, Gozewijn D Laverman","doi":"10.2196/50849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of missing data on individual continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data is unknown but can influence clinical decision-making for patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the consequences of data loss on glucose metrics in individual patient recordings from continuous glucose monitors and assess its implications on clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CGM data were collected from patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes using the FreeStyle Libre sensor (Abbott Diabetes Care). We selected 7-28 days of 24 hours of continuous data without any missing values from each individual patient. To mimic real-world data loss, missing data ranging from 5% to 50% were introduced into the data set. From this modified data set, clinical metrics including time below range (TBR), TBR level 2 (TBR2), and other common glucose metrics were calculated in the data sets with and that without data loss. Recordings in which glucose metrics deviated relevantly due to data loss, as determined by clinical experts, were defined as expert panel boundary error (ε<sub>EPB</sub>). These errors were expressed as a percentage of the total number of recordings. The errors for the recordings with glucose management indicator <53 mmol/mol were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 84 patients contributed to 798 recordings over 28 days. With 5%-50% data loss for 7-28 days recordings, the ε<sub>EPB</sub> varied from 0 out of 798 (0.0%) to 147 out of 736 (20.0%) for TBR and 0 out of 612 (0.0%) to 22 out of 408 (5.4%) recordings for TBR2. In the case of 14-day recordings, TBR and TBR2 episodes completely disappeared due to 30% data loss in 2 out of 786 (0.3%) and 32 out of 522 (6.1%) of the cases, respectively. However, the initial values of the disappeared TBR and TBR2 were relatively small (<0.1%). In the recordings with glucose management indicator <53 mmol/mol the ε<sub>EPB</sub> was 9.6% for 14 days with 30% data loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With a maximum of 30% data loss in 14-day CGM recordings, there is minimal impact of missing data on the clinical interpretation of various glucose metrics.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05584293; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05584293.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consequences of Data Loss on Clinical Decision-Making in Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Niala den Braber, Carlijn I R Braem, Miriam M R Vollenbroek-Hutten, Hermie J Hermens, Thomas Urgert, Utku S Yavuz, Peter H Veltink, Gozewijn D Laverman\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/50849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of missing data on individual continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data is unknown but can influence clinical decision-making for patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the consequences of data loss on glucose metrics in individual patient recordings from continuous glucose monitors and assess its implications on clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CGM data were collected from patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes using the FreeStyle Libre sensor (Abbott Diabetes Care). We selected 7-28 days of 24 hours of continuous data without any missing values from each individual patient. To mimic real-world data loss, missing data ranging from 5% to 50% were introduced into the data set. From this modified data set, clinical metrics including time below range (TBR), TBR level 2 (TBR2), and other common glucose metrics were calculated in the data sets with and that without data loss. Recordings in which glucose metrics deviated relevantly due to data loss, as determined by clinical experts, were defined as expert panel boundary error (ε<sub>EPB</sub>). These errors were expressed as a percentage of the total number of recordings. The errors for the recordings with glucose management indicator <53 mmol/mol were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 84 patients contributed to 798 recordings over 28 days. With 5%-50% data loss for 7-28 days recordings, the ε<sub>EPB</sub> varied from 0 out of 798 (0.0%) to 147 out of 736 (20.0%) for TBR and 0 out of 612 (0.0%) to 22 out of 408 (5.4%) recordings for TBR2. In the case of 14-day recordings, TBR and TBR2 episodes completely disappeared due to 30% data loss in 2 out of 786 (0.3%) and 32 out of 522 (6.1%) of the cases, respectively. However, the initial values of the disappeared TBR and TBR2 were relatively small (<0.1%). In the recordings with glucose management indicator <53 mmol/mol the ε<sub>EPB</sub> was 9.6% for 14 days with 30% data loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With a maximum of 30% data loss in 14-day CGM recordings, there is minimal impact of missing data on the clinical interpretation of various glucose metrics.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05584293; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05584293.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interactive Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325125/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interactive Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/50849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/50849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:个人连续血糖监测(CGM)数据缺失的影响尚不清楚,但会影响患者的临床决策:个人连续血糖监测(CGM)数据缺失的影响尚不清楚,但会影响患者的临床决策:我们旨在研究连续血糖监测仪记录的单个患者数据丢失对血糖指标的影响,并评估其对临床决策的影响:使用 FreeStyle Libre 传感器(雅培糖尿病护理公司)收集 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者的 CGM 数据。我们选取了每位患者 7-28 天 24 小时的连续数据,且没有任何缺失值。为了模拟真实世界的数据丢失情况,我们在数据集中引入了 5% 到 50% 的缺失数据。根据修改后的数据集,在有数据丢失和无数据丢失的数据集中计算临床指标,包括低于量程时间(TBR)、TBR 2 级(TBR2)和其他常见血糖指标。根据临床专家的判断,由于数据丢失导致血糖指标出现相关偏差的记录被定义为专家小组边界误差(εEPB)。这些误差以占记录总数的百分比表示。血糖管理指标记录的误差 结果:共有 84 名患者在 28 天内进行了 798 次记录。在 7-28 天的记录中,数据丢失率为 5%-50%,εEPB 从 798 次记录中的 0 次(0.0%)到 736 次记录中的 147 次(20.0%)不等;TBR2 从 612 次记录中的 0 次(0.0%)到 408 次记录中的 22 次(5.4%)不等。在 14 天的记录中,786 个案例中有 2 个案例(0.3%)和 522 个案例中有 32 个案例(6.1%)的 TBR 和 TBR2 事件由于 30% 的数据丢失而完全消失。然而,TBR 和 TBR2 消失的初始值相对较小(在数据丢失 30% 的情况下,14 天的 EPB 为 9.6%):结论:在 14 天 CGM 记录中,数据丢失最多不超过 30%,数据丢失对各种血糖指标的临床解释影响很小:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05584293;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05584293。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consequences of Data Loss on Clinical Decision-Making in Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: The impact of missing data on individual continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data is unknown but can influence clinical decision-making for patients.

Objective: We aimed to investigate the consequences of data loss on glucose metrics in individual patient recordings from continuous glucose monitors and assess its implications on clinical decision-making.

Methods: The CGM data were collected from patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes using the FreeStyle Libre sensor (Abbott Diabetes Care). We selected 7-28 days of 24 hours of continuous data without any missing values from each individual patient. To mimic real-world data loss, missing data ranging from 5% to 50% were introduced into the data set. From this modified data set, clinical metrics including time below range (TBR), TBR level 2 (TBR2), and other common glucose metrics were calculated in the data sets with and that without data loss. Recordings in which glucose metrics deviated relevantly due to data loss, as determined by clinical experts, were defined as expert panel boundary error (εEPB). These errors were expressed as a percentage of the total number of recordings. The errors for the recordings with glucose management indicator <53 mmol/mol were investigated.

Results: A total of 84 patients contributed to 798 recordings over 28 days. With 5%-50% data loss for 7-28 days recordings, the εEPB varied from 0 out of 798 (0.0%) to 147 out of 736 (20.0%) for TBR and 0 out of 612 (0.0%) to 22 out of 408 (5.4%) recordings for TBR2. In the case of 14-day recordings, TBR and TBR2 episodes completely disappeared due to 30% data loss in 2 out of 786 (0.3%) and 32 out of 522 (6.1%) of the cases, respectively. However, the initial values of the disappeared TBR and TBR2 were relatively small (<0.1%). In the recordings with glucose management indicator <53 mmol/mol the εEPB was 9.6% for 14 days with 30% data loss.

Conclusions: With a maximum of 30% data loss in 14-day CGM recordings, there is minimal impact of missing data on the clinical interpretation of various glucose metrics.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05584293; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05584293.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Interactive Journal of Medical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Screening for Depression Using Natural Language Processing: Literature Review. Telemedicine for Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a Publicly Funded Hospital System: Retrospective Study. Blended Psychological Therapy for the Treatment of Psychological Disorders in Adult Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Portuguese Version of the Oral Frailty Index-8: Instrument Validation Study. Correction: Automated Psychotherapy in a Spaceflight Environment: Advantages, Drawbacks, and Unknowns.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1