类风湿关节炎患者神经认知功能障碍的患病率--系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neuropsychologist Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1080/13854046.2024.2378521
Daniel Pankowski, Kinga Wytrychiewicz-Pankowska, Ewa Pisula, Andrzej M Fal
{"title":"类风湿关节炎患者神经认知功能障碍的患病率--系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Daniel Pankowski, Kinga Wytrychiewicz-Pankowska, Ewa Pisula, Andrzej M Fal","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2024.2378521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>This study aimed to evaluate prevalence rates (PRs) of neurocognitive impairment and its potential moderators among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). <b>Method</b>A systematic review of the available literature and data extraction was undertaken on 6 August 2021, with the update by 14 September 2023, by two reviewers independently. Literature was screened for reported rates of prevalence of neurocognitive impairment in RA patients. The meta-analysis was performed using RStudio with the \"meta\" library. <b>Results</b>Twenty-two studies that fulfilled all selection criteria were carefully analyzed. The PR of neurocognitive impairment was 0.49 [0.38-0.61] across all studies included in the review; 0.75 [0.54-0.88] for the MoCA; 0.56 [0.40-0.72] for the MMSE; and 0.26 [0.16-0.38] for comprehensive batteries. The meta-regression results indicated that, depending on the measurement method, the percentage of subjects with positive rheumatoid factor, women ratio, mean age of participants, mean duration of RA, and percentage of domains that had to be impaired to diagnose neurocognitive impairment turned out to be statistically significant moderators. <b>Conclusions</b>Neurocognitive impairment is a clinically relevant condition in many RA patients, and its prevalence is alarming high.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of neurocognitive impairment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis - a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Pankowski, Kinga Wytrychiewicz-Pankowska, Ewa Pisula, Andrzej M Fal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13854046.2024.2378521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective</b>This study aimed to evaluate prevalence rates (PRs) of neurocognitive impairment and its potential moderators among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). <b>Method</b>A systematic review of the available literature and data extraction was undertaken on 6 August 2021, with the update by 14 September 2023, by two reviewers independently. Literature was screened for reported rates of prevalence of neurocognitive impairment in RA patients. The meta-analysis was performed using RStudio with the \\\"meta\\\" library. <b>Results</b>Twenty-two studies that fulfilled all selection criteria were carefully analyzed. The PR of neurocognitive impairment was 0.49 [0.38-0.61] across all studies included in the review; 0.75 [0.54-0.88] for the MoCA; 0.56 [0.40-0.72] for the MMSE; and 0.26 [0.16-0.38] for comprehensive batteries. The meta-regression results indicated that, depending on the measurement method, the percentage of subjects with positive rheumatoid factor, women ratio, mean age of participants, mean duration of RA, and percentage of domains that had to be impaired to diagnose neurocognitive impairment turned out to be statistically significant moderators. <b>Conclusions</b>Neurocognitive impairment is a clinically relevant condition in many RA patients, and its prevalence is alarming high.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2378521\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2378521","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在评估类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者中神经认知障碍的患病率(PRs)及其潜在的调节因素。方法 2021 年 8 月 6 日,两名审稿人独立对现有文献进行了系统性回顾和数据提取,并于 2023 年 9 月 14 日进行了更新。对文献进行筛选,以了解报告的 RA 患者神经认知障碍患病率。荟萃分析使用 RStudio 的 "meta "库进行。结果对符合所有筛选标准的 22 项研究进行了仔细分析。在所有纳入综述的研究中,神经认知障碍的 PR 为 0.49 [0.38-0.61];MoCA 为 0.75 [0.54-0.88];MMSE 为 0.56 [0.40-0.72];综合电池为 0.26 [0.16-0.38]。元回归结果表明,根据测量方法的不同,类风湿因子阳性受试者的比例、女性比例、受试者的平均年龄、RA的平均持续时间以及诊断神经认知功能障碍必须受损的领域的比例在统计学上具有显著的调节作用。结论神经认知障碍是许多 RA 患者的一种临床相关症状,其发病率之高令人震惊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence of neurocognitive impairment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate prevalence rates (PRs) of neurocognitive impairment and its potential moderators among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). MethodA systematic review of the available literature and data extraction was undertaken on 6 August 2021, with the update by 14 September 2023, by two reviewers independently. Literature was screened for reported rates of prevalence of neurocognitive impairment in RA patients. The meta-analysis was performed using RStudio with the "meta" library. ResultsTwenty-two studies that fulfilled all selection criteria were carefully analyzed. The PR of neurocognitive impairment was 0.49 [0.38-0.61] across all studies included in the review; 0.75 [0.54-0.88] for the MoCA; 0.56 [0.40-0.72] for the MMSE; and 0.26 [0.16-0.38] for comprehensive batteries. The meta-regression results indicated that, depending on the measurement method, the percentage of subjects with positive rheumatoid factor, women ratio, mean age of participants, mean duration of RA, and percentage of domains that had to be impaired to diagnose neurocognitive impairment turned out to be statistically significant moderators. ConclusionsNeurocognitive impairment is a clinically relevant condition in many RA patients, and its prevalence is alarming high.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
期刊最新文献
Large-scale evidence for the validity of remote MoCA administration among people with cerebellar ataxia. A clinical evaluation program to monitor neurocognitive risk in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease. Correction. Neuropsychology practice guidance for the neuropsychiatric aspects of Long COVID. The role of cognitive reserve and depression on executive function in older adults: A 10-year study from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1