4DOF 主动悬挂系统的优化和鲁棒控制方法:考虑不确定性因素的比较研究

Yunes Alqudsi, Fevzi Cakmak Bolat, Murat Makaraci
{"title":"4DOF 主动悬挂系统的优化和鲁棒控制方法:考虑不确定性因素的比较研究","authors":"Yunes Alqudsi, Fevzi Cakmak Bolat, Murat Makaraci","doi":"10.1002/oca.3192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing from recent developments in the field, this article explores advanced control methodologies for active suspension systems with the aim of enhancing ride comfort and vehicle handling. The study systematically and comprehensively implements, simulates, and compares five control methods: Proportional‐integral‐derivative (PID), linear quadratic regulator (LQR), , , and synthesis in the context of half‐vehicle active suspension systems. By using a detailed system model that includes parameter uncertainties and performance weights, analysis, and simulations are conducted to evaluate the performance of each control approach. The results provide valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of these methods, offering a comprehensive comparative analysis. Notably, the study reveals that control may not ensure stability for all possible combinations within a broad range of uncertainties, indicating the need for careful consideration in its application. The results and simulations thoroughly evaluate and compare the performance of each control strategy across various output responses, contributing to the advancement of more effective and reliable active suspension systems.","PeriodicalId":501055,"journal":{"name":"Optimal Control Applications and Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal and robust control methodologies for 4DOF active suspension systems: A comparative study with uncertainty considerations\",\"authors\":\"Yunes Alqudsi, Fevzi Cakmak Bolat, Murat Makaraci\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/oca.3192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawing from recent developments in the field, this article explores advanced control methodologies for active suspension systems with the aim of enhancing ride comfort and vehicle handling. The study systematically and comprehensively implements, simulates, and compares five control methods: Proportional‐integral‐derivative (PID), linear quadratic regulator (LQR), , , and synthesis in the context of half‐vehicle active suspension systems. By using a detailed system model that includes parameter uncertainties and performance weights, analysis, and simulations are conducted to evaluate the performance of each control approach. The results provide valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of these methods, offering a comprehensive comparative analysis. Notably, the study reveals that control may not ensure stability for all possible combinations within a broad range of uncertainties, indicating the need for careful consideration in its application. The results and simulations thoroughly evaluate and compare the performance of each control strategy across various output responses, contributing to the advancement of more effective and reliable active suspension systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Optimal Control Applications and Methods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Optimal Control Applications and Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.3192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optimal Control Applications and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oca.3192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从该领域的最新发展出发,探讨了主动悬架系统的先进控制方法,旨在提高驾乘舒适性和车辆操控性。研究系统而全面地实施、模拟和比较了五种控制方法:比例-积分-派生(PID)、线性二次调节器(LQR)、、和合成五种控制方法。通过使用包含参数不确定性和性能权重的详细系统模型、分析和模拟,对每种控制方法的性能进行了评估。研究结果为了解这些方法的优势和局限性提供了宝贵的见解,并提供了全面的比较分析。值得注意的是,研究揭示了在广泛的不确定性范围内,控制可能无法确保所有可能组合的稳定性,这表明在应用时需要慎重考虑。研究结果和模拟对每种控制策略在不同输出响应下的性能进行了全面评估和比较,有助于推动更有效、更可靠的主动悬架系统的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimal and robust control methodologies for 4DOF active suspension systems: A comparative study with uncertainty considerations
Drawing from recent developments in the field, this article explores advanced control methodologies for active suspension systems with the aim of enhancing ride comfort and vehicle handling. The study systematically and comprehensively implements, simulates, and compares five control methods: Proportional‐integral‐derivative (PID), linear quadratic regulator (LQR), , , and synthesis in the context of half‐vehicle active suspension systems. By using a detailed system model that includes parameter uncertainties and performance weights, analysis, and simulations are conducted to evaluate the performance of each control approach. The results provide valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of these methods, offering a comprehensive comparative analysis. Notably, the study reveals that control may not ensure stability for all possible combinations within a broad range of uncertainties, indicating the need for careful consideration in its application. The results and simulations thoroughly evaluate and compare the performance of each control strategy across various output responses, contributing to the advancement of more effective and reliable active suspension systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An optimal demand side management for microgrid cost minimization considering renewables Output feedback control of anti‐linear systems using adaptive dynamic programming Reachable set estimation of delayed Markovian jump neural networks based on an augmented zero equality approach Adaptive neural network dynamic surface optimal saturation control for single‐phase grid‐connected photovoltaic systems Intelligent integration of ANN and H‐infinity control for optimal enhanced performance of a wind generation unit linked to a power system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1