报价框架效应:复制与扩展

IF 2.5 3区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Marketing Letters Pub Date : 2024-07-29 DOI:10.1007/s11002-024-09739-1
Louisa M. Pfeifer, Thomas F. Schreiner
{"title":"报价框架效应:复制与扩展","authors":"Louisa M. Pfeifer, Thomas F. Schreiner","doi":"10.1007/s11002-024-09739-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The article by Mittelman et al. (2014, <i>Journal of Consumer Research</i>, 41(4):953–964) introduced the <i>offer framing effect</i>, suggesting that consumers exhibit greater variety-seeking behavior when selecting products sequentially (single offering) compared to choosing from bundles (bundled offering). The opposite was found by O’Donnell et al. (2023, <i>Journal of Consumer Research,</i> 49(5):861–881), resulting in opposing management implications. To clarify the direction of effect, we conducted four studies in two product categories and found evidence of a stronger preference for variety in bundled offering conditions (compared to single offering conditions), replicating O’Donnell et al.’s (2023) findings. However, utilizing logistic regression analyses, we identify product liking discrepancies as the primary driver of variety seeking. We further reveal that the offer framing effect is more distinctive for choices between products with prosocial attributes compared to hedonic attributes. Our findings provide valuable insights for marketers aiming to optimize product bundling strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48068,"journal":{"name":"Marketing Letters","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The offer framing effect: a replication and extension\",\"authors\":\"Louisa M. Pfeifer, Thomas F. Schreiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11002-024-09739-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The article by Mittelman et al. (2014, <i>Journal of Consumer Research</i>, 41(4):953–964) introduced the <i>offer framing effect</i>, suggesting that consumers exhibit greater variety-seeking behavior when selecting products sequentially (single offering) compared to choosing from bundles (bundled offering). The opposite was found by O’Donnell et al. (2023, <i>Journal of Consumer Research,</i> 49(5):861–881), resulting in opposing management implications. To clarify the direction of effect, we conducted four studies in two product categories and found evidence of a stronger preference for variety in bundled offering conditions (compared to single offering conditions), replicating O’Donnell et al.’s (2023) findings. However, utilizing logistic regression analyses, we identify product liking discrepancies as the primary driver of variety seeking. We further reveal that the offer framing effect is more distinctive for choices between products with prosocial attributes compared to hedonic attributes. Our findings provide valuable insights for marketers aiming to optimize product bundling strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marketing Letters\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marketing Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-024-09739-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marketing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-024-09739-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

米特尔曼等人(2014,《消费者研究杂志》,41(4):953-964)的文章提出了产品框架效应,认为消费者在选择产品时,连续选择(单一产品)比捆绑选择(捆绑产品)表现出更大的多样性追求行为。而 O'Donnell 等人(2023 年,《消费者研究杂志》,49(5):861-881)的研究结果恰恰相反,从而产生了截然相反的管理影响。为了明确影响的方向,我们在两个产品类别中进行了四项研究,发现有证据表明,在捆绑销售条件下(与单一销售条件相比),消费者更偏好多样性,这与 O'Donnell 等人(2023 年)的研究结果如出一辙。然而,通过逻辑回归分析,我们发现产品喜好差异是寻求多样性的主要驱动因素。我们进一步发现,与享乐属性相比,优惠框架效应在具有亲社会属性的产品之间的选择中更为明显。我们的研究结果为营销人员优化产品捆绑策略提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The offer framing effect: a replication and extension

The article by Mittelman et al. (2014, Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4):953–964) introduced the offer framing effect, suggesting that consumers exhibit greater variety-seeking behavior when selecting products sequentially (single offering) compared to choosing from bundles (bundled offering). The opposite was found by O’Donnell et al. (2023, Journal of Consumer Research, 49(5):861–881), resulting in opposing management implications. To clarify the direction of effect, we conducted four studies in two product categories and found evidence of a stronger preference for variety in bundled offering conditions (compared to single offering conditions), replicating O’Donnell et al.’s (2023) findings. However, utilizing logistic regression analyses, we identify product liking discrepancies as the primary driver of variety seeking. We further reveal that the offer framing effect is more distinctive for choices between products with prosocial attributes compared to hedonic attributes. Our findings provide valuable insights for marketers aiming to optimize product bundling strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marketing Letters
Marketing Letters BUSINESS-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Marketing Letters: A Journal of Research in Marketing publishes high-quality, shorter paper (under 5,000 words including abstract, main text and references, which is equivalent to 20 total pages, double-spaced with 12 point Times New Roman font) on marketing, the emphasis being on immediacy and current interest. The journal offers a medium for the truly rapid publication of research results. The focus of Marketing Letters is on empirical findings, methodological papers, and theoretical and conceptual insights across areas of research in marketing. Marketing Letters is required reading for anyone working in marketing science, consumer research, methodology, and marketing strategy and management. The key subject areas and topics covered in Marketing Letters are: choice models, consumer behavior, consumer research, management science, market research, sales and advertising, marketing management, marketing research, marketing science, psychology, and statistics. Officially cited as: Mark Lett
期刊最新文献
Impacts of generative AI on user contributions: evidence from a coding Q &A platform Advancing the science of marketing Myopic marketing management and stock performance in the short term: the moderating role of asset turnover Celebrating excellence: insights from the 2024 Paul D. Converse Symposium Navigating choices: a framework of consumer search
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1