快讯等级长度效应

IF 5.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Marketing Research Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1177/00222437241268439
Vivian (Jieru) Xie, Fengyan Cai, Rajesh Bagchi
{"title":"快讯等级长度效应","authors":"Vivian (Jieru) Xie, Fengyan Cai, Rajesh Bagchi","doi":"10.1177/00222437241268439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rank lists vary in the number of items ranked on the list (e.g., Top 5 vs. Top 20 movies on IMDb), that is, the rank length. Across ten studies, including both field and laboratory experiments, we examine the influence of rank length on evaluations, willingness to pay, and choice. We document a novel rank length effect: The same ranked items elicit more positive judgments when the rank length is longer (vs. shorter), although the differences in judgments between the ranked items are smaller. This effect is driven both by consumers’ tendency to narrowly focus on the rank list and by the manner via which they map the rank list onto their mental number line. The rank length effect extends to willingness to pay, and choice. We explore three different kinds of choice contexts, discuss implications, and offer suggestions for future research.","PeriodicalId":48465,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing Research","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: The Rank Length Effect\",\"authors\":\"Vivian (Jieru) Xie, Fengyan Cai, Rajesh Bagchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00222437241268439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rank lists vary in the number of items ranked on the list (e.g., Top 5 vs. Top 20 movies on IMDb), that is, the rank length. Across ten studies, including both field and laboratory experiments, we examine the influence of rank length on evaluations, willingness to pay, and choice. We document a novel rank length effect: The same ranked items elicit more positive judgments when the rank length is longer (vs. shorter), although the differences in judgments between the ranked items are smaller. This effect is driven both by consumers’ tendency to narrowly focus on the rank list and by the manner via which they map the rank list onto their mental number line. The rank length effect extends to willingness to pay, and choice. We explore three different kinds of choice contexts, discuss implications, and offer suggestions for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marketing Research\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marketing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437241268439\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437241268439","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

排名榜上排名的项目数量各不相同(例如,IMDb 上排名前 5 位的电影与排名前 20 位的电影),即排名长度不同。我们通过现场和实验室实验等十项研究,考察了排名长度对评价、支付意愿和选择的影响。我们发现了一种新的排名长度效应:当等级长度较长(相对于较短)时,相同等级的项目会引起更多的积极评价,尽管不同等级项目之间的评价差异较小。造成这种效应的原因是消费者倾向于将注意力集中在排名表上,以及他们将排名表映射到心理数字线上的方式。排序长度效应延伸至支付意愿和选择。我们探讨了三种不同的选择情境,讨论了其影响,并对未来研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPRESS: The Rank Length Effect
Rank lists vary in the number of items ranked on the list (e.g., Top 5 vs. Top 20 movies on IMDb), that is, the rank length. Across ten studies, including both field and laboratory experiments, we examine the influence of rank length on evaluations, willingness to pay, and choice. We document a novel rank length effect: The same ranked items elicit more positive judgments when the rank length is longer (vs. shorter), although the differences in judgments between the ranked items are smaller. This effect is driven both by consumers’ tendency to narrowly focus on the rank list and by the manner via which they map the rank list onto their mental number line. The rank length effect extends to willingness to pay, and choice. We explore three different kinds of choice contexts, discuss implications, and offer suggestions for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
6.60%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JMR is written for those academics and practitioners of marketing research who need to be in the forefront of the profession and in possession of the industry"s cutting-edge information. JMR publishes articles representing the entire spectrum of research in marketing. The editorial content is peer-reviewed by an expert panel of leading academics. Articles address the concepts, methods, and applications of marketing research that present new techniques for solving marketing problems; contribute to marketing knowledge based on the use of experimental, descriptive, or analytical techniques; and review and comment on the developments and concepts in related fields that have a bearing on the research industry and its practices.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Who Shares Fake News? Uncovering Insights from Social Media Users' Post Histories EXPRESS: Monitoring Technologies in Industrial Systems EXPRESS: How Listening versus Reading Alters Consumers’ Interpretations of News EXPRESS: The Closing-the-Gap Effect: Joint Evaluation Leads Donors to Help Charities Farther from Their Goal EXPRESS: Zooming in on the Very Early Days: The Role of Trademark Applications in the Acquisition of Venture Capital Seed Funding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1