用于居家筛查痴呆症患者躁动发作的可解释机器学习工具

Marirena Bafaloukou, Ann-Kathrin Schalkamp, Nan Victoria Fletcher-Lloyd, Alexander Capstick, Chloe Walsh, Cynthia Sandor, Samaneh Kouchaki, Ramin Nilforooshan, Payam Barnaghi
{"title":"用于居家筛查痴呆症患者躁动发作的可解释机器学习工具","authors":"Marirena Bafaloukou, Ann-Kathrin Schalkamp, Nan Victoria Fletcher-Lloyd, Alexander Capstick, Chloe Walsh, Cynthia Sandor, Samaneh Kouchaki, Ramin Nilforooshan, Payam Barnaghi","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.30.24311178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nAgitation affects around 30% of people living with dementia (PLwD), increasing carer burden and straining care services. Agitation screening typically relies on subjective clinical scales and direct patient observation, which are resource-intensive and challenging to incorporate into routine care. Clinical applicability of data-driven methods for agitation screening is limited by constraints such as short observational periods, data granularity, and lack of interpretability and generalisability. Current interventions for agitation are primarily medication-based, which may lead to severe side effects and lack personalisation. Understanding how real-world factors affect agitation within home settings offers a promising avenue towards identifying potential personalised non-pharmacological interventions. Methods\nWe used longitudinal data (32,896 person-days from n=63 PLwD) collected using in-home monitoring devices. Employing machine learning techniques, we developed a screening tool to determine the weekly risk of agitation. We incorporated a traffic-light system for risk stratification to aid clinical decision-making and employed the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework to increase interpretability. We designed an interactive tool that enables the exploration of personalised non-pharmacological interventions, such as modifying ambient light and temperature. Results\nLight Gradient-boosting Machine (LightGBM) achieved the highest performance in identifying agitation with a sensitivity of 71.32±7.38% and specificity of 75.28±10.43%. Implementing the traffic-light system for risk stratification increased specificity by 15% and improved all metrics. Significant contributors to agitation included low nocturnal respiratory rate, heightened alertness during sleep, and increased indoor illuminance, as revealed by statistical and feature importance analysis. Using our interactive tool, we identified that adjusting indoor lighting levels and temperature were promising and feasible interventions within our cohort. Conclusions\nOur interpretable framework for agitation screening, developed using data from a dementia care study, showcases significant clinical value. The accompanying interactive interface allows for the in-silico simulation of non-pharmacological interventions, facilitating the design of personalised interventions that can improve in-home dementia care.","PeriodicalId":501454,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","volume":"208 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Interpretable Machine Learning Tool for In-Home Screening of Agitation Episodes in People Living with Dementia\",\"authors\":\"Marirena Bafaloukou, Ann-Kathrin Schalkamp, Nan Victoria Fletcher-Lloyd, Alexander Capstick, Chloe Walsh, Cynthia Sandor, Samaneh Kouchaki, Ramin Nilforooshan, Payam Barnaghi\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.30.24311178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nAgitation affects around 30% of people living with dementia (PLwD), increasing carer burden and straining care services. Agitation screening typically relies on subjective clinical scales and direct patient observation, which are resource-intensive and challenging to incorporate into routine care. Clinical applicability of data-driven methods for agitation screening is limited by constraints such as short observational periods, data granularity, and lack of interpretability and generalisability. Current interventions for agitation are primarily medication-based, which may lead to severe side effects and lack personalisation. Understanding how real-world factors affect agitation within home settings offers a promising avenue towards identifying potential personalised non-pharmacological interventions. Methods\\nWe used longitudinal data (32,896 person-days from n=63 PLwD) collected using in-home monitoring devices. Employing machine learning techniques, we developed a screening tool to determine the weekly risk of agitation. We incorporated a traffic-light system for risk stratification to aid clinical decision-making and employed the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework to increase interpretability. We designed an interactive tool that enables the exploration of personalised non-pharmacological interventions, such as modifying ambient light and temperature. Results\\nLight Gradient-boosting Machine (LightGBM) achieved the highest performance in identifying agitation with a sensitivity of 71.32±7.38% and specificity of 75.28±10.43%. Implementing the traffic-light system for risk stratification increased specificity by 15% and improved all metrics. Significant contributors to agitation included low nocturnal respiratory rate, heightened alertness during sleep, and increased indoor illuminance, as revealed by statistical and feature importance analysis. Using our interactive tool, we identified that adjusting indoor lighting levels and temperature were promising and feasible interventions within our cohort. Conclusions\\nOur interpretable framework for agitation screening, developed using data from a dementia care study, showcases significant clinical value. The accompanying interactive interface allows for the in-silico simulation of non-pharmacological interventions, facilitating the design of personalised interventions that can improve in-home dementia care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Health Informatics\",\"volume\":\"208 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Health Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.30.24311178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.30.24311178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景大约 30% 的痴呆症患者会出现躁动,这增加了照护者的负担,也使护理服务变得更加紧张。躁动筛查通常依赖于主观临床量表和对患者的直接观察,这需要大量资源,而且很难将其纳入常规护理中。数据驱动的躁动筛查方法的临床适用性受到观察期短、数据粒度大、缺乏可解释性和普遍性等限制。目前针对躁动的干预措施主要以药物治疗为主,这可能会导致严重的副作用,而且缺乏个性化。了解真实世界中的因素如何影响家庭环境中的躁动,为确定潜在的个性化非药物干预措施提供了一条很有前景的途径。方法我们使用家庭监控设备收集的纵向数据(32,896 人天,来自 63 名 PLwD 患者)。利用机器学习技术,我们开发了一种筛查工具来确定每周的躁动风险。我们采用了风险分层交通灯系统来帮助临床决策,并采用了 SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) 框架来提高可解释性。我们设计了一种交互式工具,可以探索个性化的非药物干预措施,如改变环境光线和温度。结果光梯度增强机(LightGBM)在识别躁动方面表现最佳,灵敏度为 71.32±7.38%,特异度为 75.28±10.43%。采用交通灯系统进行风险分层后,特异性提高了 15%,并改善了所有指标。统计和特征重要性分析表明,导致躁动的重要因素包括夜间呼吸频率低、睡眠时警觉性提高以及室内光照度增加。通过使用我们的互动工具,我们发现调整室内照明度和温度在我们的队列中是有希望且可行的干预措施。结论我们利用痴呆症护理研究的数据开发的可解释躁动筛查框架具有重要的临床价值。与之配套的交互式界面可以对非药物干预措施进行实验室内模拟,促进个性化干预措施的设计,从而改善居家痴呆症护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Interpretable Machine Learning Tool for In-Home Screening of Agitation Episodes in People Living with Dementia
Background Agitation affects around 30% of people living with dementia (PLwD), increasing carer burden and straining care services. Agitation screening typically relies on subjective clinical scales and direct patient observation, which are resource-intensive and challenging to incorporate into routine care. Clinical applicability of data-driven methods for agitation screening is limited by constraints such as short observational periods, data granularity, and lack of interpretability and generalisability. Current interventions for agitation are primarily medication-based, which may lead to severe side effects and lack personalisation. Understanding how real-world factors affect agitation within home settings offers a promising avenue towards identifying potential personalised non-pharmacological interventions. Methods We used longitudinal data (32,896 person-days from n=63 PLwD) collected using in-home monitoring devices. Employing machine learning techniques, we developed a screening tool to determine the weekly risk of agitation. We incorporated a traffic-light system for risk stratification to aid clinical decision-making and employed the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) framework to increase interpretability. We designed an interactive tool that enables the exploration of personalised non-pharmacological interventions, such as modifying ambient light and temperature. Results Light Gradient-boosting Machine (LightGBM) achieved the highest performance in identifying agitation with a sensitivity of 71.32±7.38% and specificity of 75.28±10.43%. Implementing the traffic-light system for risk stratification increased specificity by 15% and improved all metrics. Significant contributors to agitation included low nocturnal respiratory rate, heightened alertness during sleep, and increased indoor illuminance, as revealed by statistical and feature importance analysis. Using our interactive tool, we identified that adjusting indoor lighting levels and temperature were promising and feasible interventions within our cohort. Conclusions Our interpretable framework for agitation screening, developed using data from a dementia care study, showcases significant clinical value. The accompanying interactive interface allows for the in-silico simulation of non-pharmacological interventions, facilitating the design of personalised interventions that can improve in-home dementia care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case is not a case is not a case - challenges and solutions in determining urolithiasis caseloads using the digital infrastructure of a clinical data warehouse Reliable Online Auditory Cognitive Testing: An observational study Federated Multiple Imputation for Variables that Are Missing Not At Random in Distributed Electronic Health Records Characterizing the connection between Parkinson's disease progression and healthcare utilization Generative AI and Large Language Models in Reducing Medication Related Harm and Adverse Drug Events - A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1